PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPHQ vs. FQAL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPHQ vs. FQAL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ) and Fidelity Quality Factor ETF (FQAL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPHQ achieves a 15.48% return, which is significantly higher than FQAL's 7.87% return.


SPHQ

1D
0.28%
1M
7.17%
YTD
15.48%
6M
16.06%
1Y
23.22%
3Y*
22.41%
5Y*
14.54%
10Y*
15.01%

FQAL

1D
-0.51%
1M
4.38%
YTD
7.87%
6M
7.86%
1Y
21.12%
3Y*
20.04%
5Y*
12.41%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPHQ vs. FQAL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPHQ
Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF
15.48%13.25%25.44%24.83%-15.76%28.03%17.36%33.64%-7.10%19.10%
FQAL
Fidelity Quality Factor ETF
7.87%16.93%21.92%24.20%-19.70%32.13%16.17%28.12%-4.39%23.03%

Correlation

The correlation between SPHQ and FQAL is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2016

0.93

The correlation between SPHQ and FQAL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

SPHQ vs. FQAL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPHQ
FQAL

Technology

28.1%
34.3%

Industrials

24.3%
9.1%

Consumer Defensive

15.4%
4.4%

Financial Services

13.3%
12.3%

Healthcare

8.4%
8.9%

Consumer Cyclical

4.6%
10.1%

Basic Materials

2.2%
2.2%

Communication Services

2.0%
10.5%

Utilities

1.0%
2.2%

Energy

0.7%
3.9%

Real Estate

-

2.2%

Technology

SPHQ
28.1%
FQAL
34.3%

Industrials

SPHQ
24.3%
FQAL
9.1%

Consumer Defensive

SPHQ
15.4%
FQAL
4.4%

Financial Services

SPHQ
13.3%
FQAL
12.3%

Healthcare

SPHQ
8.4%
FQAL
8.9%

Consumer Cyclical

SPHQ
4.6%
FQAL
10.1%

Basic Materials

SPHQ
2.2%
FQAL
2.2%

Communication Services

SPHQ
2.0%
FQAL
10.5%

Utilities

SPHQ
1.0%
FQAL
2.2%

Energy

SPHQ
0.7%
FQAL
3.9%

Real Estate

SPHQ

-

FQAL
2.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPHQ vs. FQAL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPHQ
SPHQ Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
SPHQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPHQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPHQ Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
SPHQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPHQ Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

FQAL
FQAL Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
FQAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FQAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
FQAL Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
FQAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
FQAL Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPHQ vs. FQAL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ) and Fidelity Quality Factor ETF (FQAL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPHQFQALDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.85

1.89

-0.04

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.69

2.70

-0.02

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.34

-0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.62

2.52

+0.11

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.17

11.41

-0.24

SPHQ vs. FQAL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPHQ Sharpe Ratio is 1.85, which is comparable to the FQAL Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPHQ and FQAL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPHQFQALDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.85

1.89

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

0.77

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.82

-0.29

Drawdowns

SPHQ vs. FQAL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPHQ drawdown since its inception was -57.83%, which is greater than FQAL's maximum drawdown of -33.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPHQ and FQAL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPHQFQALDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.83%

-33.71%

-24.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.90%

-8.43%

-0.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.57%

-16.87%

+0.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.04%

-25.50%

+0.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.51%

+0.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.70%

-4.59%

-6.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.08%

1.86%

+0.22%

Volatility

SPHQ vs. FQAL - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ) has a higher volatility of 3.49% compared to Fidelity Quality Factor ETF (FQAL) at 2.33%. This indicates that SPHQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FQAL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPHQFQALDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.49%

2.33%

+1.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.18%

8.57%

+1.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.62%

11.21%

+1.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.45%

16.18%

+0.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.86%

17.58%

+0.28%

SPHQ vs. FQAL - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPHQ has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than FQAL's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPHQ vs. FQAL - Dividend Comparison

SPHQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%, less than FQAL's 1.12% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FQAL
Fidelity Quality Factor ETF
1.12%1.12%1.20%1.35%1.52%1.17%1.46%1.55%1.73%1.53%0.43%0.00%
SPHQ
Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF
1.04%1.09%1.15%1.42%1.85%1.19%1.55%1.51%1.85%1.57%1.67%2.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPHQ and FQAL have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPHQ has higher volatility (3.49%) compared to FQAL (2.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPHQ dropped -57.83% vs FQAL's -33.71%.

On 5-year performance, SPHQ leads with 14.54% vs 12.41% for FQAL. On fees, SPHQ is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, FQAL has been the lower-risk option at 2.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SPHQ has performed better with a 14.54% return vs 12.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPHQ is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for FQAL.

FQAL has the higher dividend yield at 1.12%, compared with 1.04% for SPHQ.

SPHQ is categorized as S&P 500, while FQAL is Large Cap Growth Equities. SPHQ tracks S&P 500 Quality Index, while FQAL tracks Fidelity U.S. Quality Factor Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SPHQ and 0.29% for FQAL.

FQAL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 1.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPHQ and FQAL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer