SPHB vs. FTEC
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco S&P 500® High Beta ETF (SPHB) and Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC).
SPHB and FTEC are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SPHB is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 High Beta Index. It was launched on May 5, 2011. FTEC is a passively managed fund by Fidelity that tracks the performance of the MSCI USA IMI Information Technology Index. It was launched on Oct 21, 2013. Both SPHB and FTEC are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: SPHB or FTEC.
Correlation
The correlation between SPHB and FTEC is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
SPHB vs. FTEC - Performance Comparison
Loading data...
Key characteristics
SPHB:
0.24
FTEC:
0.53
SPHB:
0.58
FTEC:
1.03
SPHB:
1.08
FTEC:
1.14
SPHB:
0.27
FTEC:
0.67
SPHB:
0.89
FTEC:
2.20
SPHB:
8.96%
FTEC:
8.37%
SPHB:
31.29%
FTEC:
30.39%
SPHB:
-46.84%
FTEC:
-34.95%
SPHB:
-4.68%
FTEC:
-4.59%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPHB achieves a 2.38% return, which is significantly higher than FTEC's -0.63% return. Over the past 10 years, SPHB has underperformed FTEC with an annualized return of 11.44%, while FTEC has yielded a comparatively higher 19.79% annualized return.
SPHB
2.38%
24.95%
3.00%
7.39%
23.57%
11.44%
FTEC
-0.63%
21.42%
2.53%
16.11%
21.16%
19.79%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SPHB vs. FTEC - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPHB has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than FTEC's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
SPHB vs. FTEC — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
SPHB
FTEC
SPHB vs. FTEC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500® High Beta ETF (SPHB) and Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Loading data...
Dividends
SPHB vs. FTEC - Dividend Comparison
SPHB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.66%, more than FTEC's 0.49% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPHB Invesco S&P 500® High Beta ETF | 0.66% | 0.80% | 0.73% | 0.72% | 0.91% | 1.90% | 1.26% | 1.96% | 1.34% | 0.93% | 1.69% | 0.98% |
FTEC Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF | 0.49% | 0.49% | 0.77% | 0.93% | 0.63% | 0.83% | 1.03% | 1.20% | 0.96% | 1.25% | 1.27% | 1.09% |
Drawdowns
SPHB vs. FTEC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPHB drawdown since its inception was -46.84%, which is greater than FTEC's maximum drawdown of -34.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPHB and FTEC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Loading data...
Volatility
SPHB vs. FTEC - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P 500® High Beta ETF (SPHB) has a higher volatility of 8.49% compared to Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC) at 7.67%. This indicates that SPHB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTEC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading data...