PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPG vs. NVS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

SPG vs. NVS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Simon Property Group, Inc. (SPG) and Novartis AG (NVS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPG achieves a 11.23% return, which is significantly higher than NVS's 7.37% return. Over the past 10 years, SPG has underperformed NVS with an annualized return of 5.39%, while NVS has yielded a comparatively higher 9.84% annualized return.


SPG

1D
0.01%
1M
1.01%
YTD
11.23%
6M
14.33%
1Y
32.08%
3Y*
30.83%
5Y*
14.96%
10Y*
5.39%

NVS

1D
0.13%
1M
-0.66%
YTD
7.37%
6M
10.70%
1Y
27.68%
3Y*
17.23%
5Y*
14.04%
10Y*
9.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPG vs. NVS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPG
Simon Property Group, Inc.
11.23%12.94%26.92%29.24%-21.91%95.72%-38.64%-6.74%2.55%0.98%
NVS
Novartis AG
7.37%46.95%0.02%16.14%8.06%-3.65%3.34%13.92%5.95%19.42%

Correlation

The correlation between SPG and NVS is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 8, 1996

0.25

The correlation between SPG and NVS shifts across timeframes, from 0.23 (10 years) to 0.40 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

SPG:

$17.14

NVS:

$6.99

PE Ratio

SPG:

11.88

NVS:

20.55

PEG Ratio

SPG:

0.47

NVS:

1.39

PS Ratio

SPG:

7.50

NVS:

4.96

Total Revenue (TTM)

SPG:

$6.65B

NVS:

$56.05B

Gross Profit (TTM)

SPG:

$5.71B

NVS:

$42.19B

EBITDA (TTM)

SPG:

$7.77B

NVS:

$22.40B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPG vs. NVS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPG
SPG Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
SPG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPG Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPG Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
SPG Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPG Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

NVS
NVS Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
NVS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVS Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
NVS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVS Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPG vs. NVS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simon Property Group, Inc. (SPG) and Novartis AG (NVS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPGNVSDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.77

1.37

+0.40

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.56

1.94

+0.62

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.24

+0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.79

2.20

+0.59

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.06

5.52

+4.54

SPG vs. NVS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPG Sharpe Ratio is 1.77, which is comparable to the NVS Sharpe Ratio of 1.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPG and NVS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPGNVSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.77

1.37

+0.40

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

0.75

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.15

0.50

-0.36

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.38

0.42

-0.03

Drawdowns

SPG vs. NVS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPG drawdown since its inception was -77.00%, which is greater than NVS's maximum drawdown of -42.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPG and NVS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPGNVSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.00%

-42.10%

-34.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.54%

-12.65%

+1.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.32%

-19.95%

-4.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.84%

-20.42%

-25.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-77.00%

-26.03%

-50.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.93%

-12.21%

+10.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.85%

-10.93%

-2.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.20%

5.03%

-1.83%

Volatility

SPG vs. NVS - Volatility Comparison

Simon Property Group, Inc. (SPG) and Novartis AG (NVS) have volatilities of 5.45% and 5.62%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPGNVSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.45%

5.62%

-0.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.61%

14.25%

-0.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.25%

20.28%

-2.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.50%

18.78%

+7.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

37.06%

19.59%

+17.47%

Dividends

SPG vs. NVS - Dividend Comparison

SPG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.25%, more than NVS's 3.32% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NVS
Novartis AG
3.32%2.90%3.84%3.44%3.70%3.86%3.22%3.03%3.47%3.24%3.73%3.10%
SPG
Simon Property Group, Inc.
4.25%4.62%4.70%5.22%5.87%3.66%7.04%5.57%4.70%4.16%3.66%3.11%

Financials

SPG vs. NVS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Simon Property Group, Inc. and Novartis AG. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


2.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00B12.00B14.00B20222023202420252026
1.76B
13.52B
(SPG) Total Revenue
(NVS) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

SPG vs. NVS - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Simon Property Group, Inc. and Novartis AG over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

70.0%75.0%80.0%85.0%90.0%20222023202420252026
82.5%
74.4%
Portfolio components
SPG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Simon Property Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.45B and revenue of 1.76B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 82.5%.

NVS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Novartis AG reported a gross profit of 10.07B and revenue of 13.52B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 74.4%.

SPG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Simon Property Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 762.16M and revenue of 1.76B, resulting in an operating margin of 43.4%.

NVS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Novartis AG reported an operating income of 4.24B and revenue of 13.52B, resulting in an operating margin of 31.3%.

SPG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Simon Property Group, Inc. reported a net income of 1.48K and revenue of 1.76B, resulting in a net margin of 0.0%.

NVS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Novartis AG reported a net income of 3.16B and revenue of 13.52B, resulting in a net margin of 23.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


SPG and NVS have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NVS has higher volatility (5.62%) compared to SPG (5.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPG dropped -77.00% vs NVS's -42.10%.

SPG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPG and NVS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer