SPFF vs. COWZ
Compare and contrast key facts about Global X SuperIncome Preferred ETF (SPFF) and Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ).
SPFF and COWZ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SPFF is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the S&P Enhanced Yield North American Preferred Stock Index. It was launched on Jul 17, 2012. COWZ is a passively managed fund by Pacer Advisors that tracks the performance of the Pacer US Cash Cows 100 Index. It was launched on Dec 16, 2016. Both SPFF and COWZ are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: SPFF or COWZ.
Correlation
The correlation between SPFF and COWZ is 0.45, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
SPFF vs. COWZ - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
SPFF:
1.04
COWZ:
0.86
SPFF:
1.45
COWZ:
1.29
SPFF:
1.19
COWZ:
1.15
SPFF:
0.69
COWZ:
1.35
SPFF:
4.70
COWZ:
3.46
SPFF:
1.83%
COWZ:
3.37%
SPFF:
8.32%
COWZ:
13.65%
SPFF:
-35.92%
COWZ:
-38.63%
SPFF:
-4.54%
COWZ:
-7.43%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPFF achieves a 9.13% return, which is significantly lower than COWZ's 10.79% return.
SPFF
9.13%
-2.44%
5.13%
8.32%
1.72%
2.19%
COWZ
10.79%
-4.05%
4.13%
10.69%
15.08%
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SPFF vs. COWZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPFF has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than COWZ's 0.49% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
SPFF vs. COWZ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X SuperIncome Preferred ETF (SPFF) and Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
SPFF vs. COWZ - Dividend Comparison
SPFF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.01%, more than COWZ's 1.92% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPFF Global X SuperIncome Preferred ETF | 6.01% | 6.64% | 7.20% | 5.84% | 5.80% | 6.01% | 7.64% | 7.29% | 7.08% | 7.54% | 6.82% | 7.37% |
COWZ Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF | 1.92% | 1.92% | 1.96% | 1.48% | 2.54% | 1.96% | 1.67% | 1.94% | 0.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
SPFF vs. COWZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPFF drawdown since its inception was -35.92%, smaller than the maximum COWZ drawdown of -38.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPFF and COWZ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
SPFF vs. COWZ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X SuperIncome Preferred ETF (SPFF) is 2.29%, while Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ) has a volatility of 4.55%. This indicates that SPFF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COWZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.