SPEM vs. XCEM
Compare and contrast key facts about SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF (SPEM) and Columbia EM Core ex-China ETF (XCEM).
SPEM and XCEM are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SPEM is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the S&P Emerging Markets BMI. It was launched on Mar 19, 2007. XCEM is a passively managed fund by Ameriprise Financial that tracks the performance of the MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index. It was launched on Sep 2, 2015. Both SPEM and XCEM are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: SPEM or XCEM.
Correlation
The correlation between SPEM and XCEM is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
SPEM vs. XCEM - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
SPEM:
1.08
XCEM:
0.33
SPEM:
1.58
XCEM:
0.54
SPEM:
1.20
XCEM:
1.07
SPEM:
0.73
XCEM:
0.45
SPEM:
4.44
XCEM:
1.24
SPEM:
3.63%
XCEM:
3.82%
SPEM:
14.87%
XCEM:
14.21%
SPEM:
-64.41%
XCEM:
-40.92%
SPEM:
-8.24%
XCEM:
-9.22%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPEM achieves a 12.28% return, which is significantly higher than XCEM's 1.33% return.
SPEM
12.28%
-0.05%
4.06%
14.48%
3.61%
4.62%
XCEM
1.33%
-1.47%
-3.54%
3.10%
3.44%
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SPEM vs. XCEM - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPEM has a 0.11% expense ratio, which is lower than XCEM's 0.16% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
SPEM vs. XCEM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF (SPEM) and Columbia EM Core ex-China ETF (XCEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
SPEM vs. XCEM - Dividend Comparison
SPEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.15%, less than XCEM's 2.74% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPEM SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF | 1.15% | 2.80% | 3.38% | 3.14% | 1.92% | 2.94% | 2.34% | 1.12% | 1.51% | 2.40% | 2.26% | 1.91% |
XCEM Columbia EM Core ex-China ETF | 2.74% | 1.22% | 2.42% | 1.94% | 1.63% | 2.11% | 3.24% | 8.57% | 1.24% | 2.57% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
SPEM vs. XCEM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPEM drawdown since its inception was -64.41%, which is greater than XCEM's maximum drawdown of -40.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPEM and XCEM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
SPEM vs. XCEM - Volatility Comparison
SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF (SPEM) has a higher volatility of 4.37% compared to Columbia EM Core ex-China ETF (XCEM) at 3.42%. This indicates that SPEM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XCEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.