SPDV vs. XLSR
SPDV (AAM S&P 500 High Dividend Value ETF) and XLSR (SPDR SSGA US Sector Rotation ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPDV is a Dividend fund tracking the S&P 500 Dividend and Free Cash Flow Yield Index, while XLSR is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by State Street. SPDV is passively managed, while XLSR is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, SPDV returned 8.27%/yr vs 10.39%/yr for XLSR. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SPDV charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for XLSR.
Performance
SPDV vs. XLSR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPDV achieves a 14.63% return, which is significantly higher than XLSR's 7.00% return.
SPDV
- 1D
- 0.35%
- 1M
- 3.08%
- YTD
- 14.63%
- 6M
- 15.97%
- 1Y
- 28.90%
- 3Y*
- 17.01%
- 5Y*
- 8.27%
- 10Y*
- —
XLSR
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 5.18%
- YTD
- 7.00%
- 6M
- 6.79%
- 1Y
- 26.84%
- 3Y*
- 17.83%
- 5Y*
- 10.39%
- 10Y*
- —
SPDV vs. XLSR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPDV AAM S&P 500 High Dividend Value ETF | 14.63% | 10.90% | 14.40% | 5.45% | -2.27% | 29.54% | -6.09% | 7.26% |
XLSR SPDR SSGA US Sector Rotation ETF | 7.00% | 17.34% | 17.60% | 18.95% | -15.70% | 20.47% | 20.23% | 14.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPDV and XLSR is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2019 | 0.68 |
Over the past year, the correlation between SPDV and XLSR has dropped to 0.42 - well below their long-term average of 0.68, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
SPDV vs. XLSR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPDV
XLSR
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Technology
Healthcare
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
-
Industrials
Communication Services
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
SPDV
XLSR
Energy
SPDV
XLSR
Technology
SPDV
XLSR
Healthcare
SPDV
XLSR
Financial Services
SPDV
XLSR
Consumer Defensive
SPDV
XLSR
Real Estate
SPDV
XLSR
-
Industrials
SPDV
XLSR
Communication Services
SPDV
XLSR
Utilities
SPDV
XLSR
-
Basic Materials
SPDV
XLSR
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPDV vs. XLSR — Risk / Return Rank
SPDV
XLSR
SPDV vs. XLSR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AAM S&P 500 High Dividend Value ETF (SPDV) and SPDR SSGA US Sector Rotation ETF (XLSR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SPDV | XLSR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.39 | 2.20 | +0.18 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.52 | 3.09 | +0.43 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.40 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.96 | 2.47 | +2.49 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.31 | 11.00 | +3.31 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPDV | XLSR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.39 | 2.20 | +0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 | 0.61 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.67 | -0.21 |
Drawdowns
SPDV vs. XLSR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPDV drawdown since its inception was -43.81%, which is greater than XLSR's maximum drawdown of -32.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPDV and XLSR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPDV | XLSR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.81% | -32.94% | -10.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.80% | -11.06% | +5.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.62% | -20.57% | +1.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.31% | -23.32% | +2.01% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.24% | 0.00% | -0.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.57% | -5.33% | -1.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.01% | 2.48% | -0.47% |
Volatility
SPDV vs. XLSR - Volatility Comparison
AAM S&P 500 High Dividend Value ETF (SPDV) and SPDR SSGA US Sector Rotation ETF (XLSR) have volatilities of 2.96% and 2.96%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPDV | XLSR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.96% | 2.96% | 0.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.16% | 9.25% | -1.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.17% | 12.25% | -0.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.30% | 17.08% | -0.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.32% | 20.04% | +0.28% |
SPDV vs. XLSR - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPDV has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than XLSR's 0.70% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPDV vs. XLSR - Dividend Comparison
SPDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.30%, more than XLSR's 0.52% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPDV AAM S&P 500 High Dividend Value ETF | 3.30% | 3.85% | 3.54% | 3.95% | 3.73% | 3.08% | 3.90% | 3.54% | 3.63% | 0.28% |
XLSR SPDR SSGA US Sector Rotation ETF | 0.52% | 0.58% | 0.66% | 1.04% | 1.80% | 3.44% | 1.25% | 0.94% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPDV and XLSR have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XLSR has higher volatility (2.96%) compared to SPDV (2.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPDV dropped -43.81% vs XLSR's -32.94%.
On 5-year performance, XLSR leads with 10.39% vs 8.27% for SPDV. On fees, SPDV is cheaper at 0.29% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, XLSR has performed better with a 10.39% return vs 8.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPDV is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for XLSR.
SPDV has the higher dividend yield at 3.30%, compared with 0.52% for XLSR.
SPDV is categorized as Dividend, while XLSR is Large Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: Advisors Asset Management and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for SPDV and 0.70% for XLSR.
SPDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 2.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPDV and XLSR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer