PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPDV vs. XLSR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPDV vs. XLSR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AAM S&P 500 High Dividend Value ETF (SPDV) and SPDR SSGA US Sector Rotation ETF (XLSR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPDV achieves a 14.63% return, which is significantly higher than XLSR's 7.00% return.


SPDV

1D
0.35%
1M
3.08%
YTD
14.63%
6M
15.97%
1Y
28.90%
3Y*
17.01%
5Y*
8.27%
10Y*

XLSR

1D
0.06%
1M
5.18%
YTD
7.00%
6M
6.79%
1Y
26.84%
3Y*
17.83%
5Y*
10.39%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPDV vs. XLSR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
SPDV
AAM S&P 500 High Dividend Value ETF
14.63%10.90%14.40%5.45%-2.27%29.54%-6.09%7.26%
XLSR
SPDR SSGA US Sector Rotation ETF
7.00%17.34%17.60%18.95%-15.70%20.47%20.23%14.13%

Correlation

The correlation between SPDV and XLSR is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2019

0.68

Over the past year, the correlation between SPDV and XLSR has dropped to 0.42 - well below their long-term average of 0.68, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

SPDV vs. XLSR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPDV
XLSR

Consumer Cyclical

13.5%
0.4%

Energy

12.3%
8.1%

Technology

11.1%
33.5%

Healthcare

9.7%
21.9%

Financial Services

9.2%
0.7%

Consumer Defensive

9.1%
5.1%

Real Estate

8.7%

-

Industrials

7.8%
13.8%

Communication Services

7.8%
16.4%

Utilities

5.8%

-

Basic Materials

5.1%

-

Consumer Cyclical

SPDV
13.5%
XLSR
0.4%

Energy

SPDV
12.3%
XLSR
8.1%

Technology

SPDV
11.1%
XLSR
33.5%

Healthcare

SPDV
9.7%
XLSR
21.9%

Financial Services

SPDV
9.2%
XLSR
0.7%

Consumer Defensive

SPDV
9.1%
XLSR
5.1%

Real Estate

SPDV
8.7%
XLSR

-

Industrials

SPDV
7.8%
XLSR
13.8%

Communication Services

SPDV
7.8%
XLSR
16.4%

Utilities

SPDV
5.8%
XLSR

-

Basic Materials

SPDV
5.1%
XLSR

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPDV vs. XLSR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPDV
SPDV Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
SPDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPDV Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
SPDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPDV Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

XLSR
XLSR Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
XLSR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLSR Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLSR Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
XLSR Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLSR Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPDV vs. XLSR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AAM S&P 500 High Dividend Value ETF (SPDV) and SPDR SSGA US Sector Rotation ETF (XLSR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPDVXLSRDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.39

2.20

+0.18

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.52

3.09

+0.43

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.40

+0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.96

2.47

+2.49

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

14.31

11.00

+3.31

SPDV vs. XLSR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPDV Sharpe Ratio is 2.39, which is comparable to the XLSR Sharpe Ratio of 2.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPDV and XLSR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPDVXLSRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.39

2.20

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

0.61

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.67

-0.21

Drawdowns

SPDV vs. XLSR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPDV drawdown since its inception was -43.81%, which is greater than XLSR's maximum drawdown of -32.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPDV and XLSR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPDVXLSRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.81%

-32.94%

-10.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.80%

-11.06%

+5.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.62%

-20.57%

+1.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.31%

-23.32%

+2.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.24%

0.00%

-0.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.57%

-5.33%

-1.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.01%

2.48%

-0.47%

Volatility

SPDV vs. XLSR - Volatility Comparison

AAM S&P 500 High Dividend Value ETF (SPDV) and SPDR SSGA US Sector Rotation ETF (XLSR) have volatilities of 2.96% and 2.96%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPDVXLSRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.96%

2.96%

0.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.16%

9.25%

-1.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.17%

12.25%

-0.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.30%

17.08%

-0.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.32%

20.04%

+0.28%

SPDV vs. XLSR - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPDV has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than XLSR's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPDV vs. XLSR - Dividend Comparison

SPDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.30%, more than XLSR's 0.52% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPDV
AAM S&P 500 High Dividend Value ETF
3.30%3.85%3.54%3.95%3.73%3.08%3.90%3.54%3.63%0.28%
XLSR
SPDR SSGA US Sector Rotation ETF
0.52%0.58%0.66%1.04%1.80%3.44%1.25%0.94%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPDV and XLSR have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XLSR has higher volatility (2.96%) compared to SPDV (2.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPDV dropped -43.81% vs XLSR's -32.94%.

On 5-year performance, XLSR leads with 10.39% vs 8.27% for SPDV. On fees, SPDV is cheaper at 0.29% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, XLSR has performed better with a 10.39% return vs 8.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPDV is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for XLSR.

SPDV has the higher dividend yield at 3.30%, compared with 0.52% for XLSR.

SPDV is categorized as Dividend, while XLSR is Large Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: Advisors Asset Management and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for SPDV and 0.70% for XLSR.

SPDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 2.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPDV and XLSR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer