PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPCE vs. SCHG
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

SPCE vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Virgin Galactic Holdings, Inc. (SPCE) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

SPCE vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
SPCE
Virgin Galactic Holdings, Inc.
-24.30%-45.41%-88.00%-29.60%-73.99%-43.62%105.45%-2.04%
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
-10.59%17.50%34.95%50.10%-31.80%28.11%39.14%7.51%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPCE achieves a -24.30% return, which is significantly lower than SCHG's -10.59% return.


SPCE

1D
11.98%
1M
-4.71%
YTD
-24.30%
6M
-37.05%
1Y
-19.80%
3Y*
-68.93%
5Y*
-66.94%
10Y*

SCHG

1D
3.67%
1M
-5.12%
YTD
-10.59%
6M
-8.51%
1Y
16.81%
3Y*
21.91%
5Y*
12.55%
10Y*
16.83%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPCE vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPCE
SPCE Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
SPCE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPCE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPCE Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
SPCE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPCE Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHG
SCHG Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
SCHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHG Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHG Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPCE vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virgin Galactic Holdings, Inc. (SPCE) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPCESCHGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.23

0.75

-0.98

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.25

1.23

-0.99

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

1.17

-0.15

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.35

1.03

-1.38

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.61

3.54

-4.15

SPCE vs. SCHG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPCE Sharpe Ratio is -0.23, which is lower than the SCHG Sharpe Ratio of 0.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPCE and SCHG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPCESCHGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.23

0.75

-0.98

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.73

0.57

-1.30

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.53

0.79

-1.32

Correlation

The correlation between SPCE and SCHG is 0.40, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

SPCE vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison

SPCE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SCHG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.43%.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPCE
Virgin Galactic Holdings, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
0.43%0.36%0.39%0.46%0.55%0.42%0.52%0.82%1.27%1.01%1.04%1.22%

Drawdowns

SPCE vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPCE drawdown since its inception was -99.82%, which is greater than SCHG's maximum drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPCE and SCHG.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


SPCESCHGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.82%

-34.59%

-65.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-54.79%

-16.41%

-38.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-99.81%

-34.59%

-65.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.80%

-13.34%

-86.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-77.89%

-5.22%

-72.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

31.48%

4.78%

+26.70%

Volatility

SPCE vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison

Virgin Galactic Holdings, Inc. (SPCE) has a higher volatility of 18.96% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) at 6.67%. This indicates that SPCE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


SPCESCHGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.96%

6.67%

+12.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

51.55%

12.51%

+39.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

85.71%

22.43%

+63.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

91.98%

22.32%

+69.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

95.83%

21.51%

+74.32%