PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SONY vs. NTDOY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

SONY vs. NTDOY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sony Group Corporation (SONY) and Nintendo Co ADR (NTDOY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SONY achieves a -23.28% return, which is significantly higher than NTDOY's -36.71% return. Over the past 10 years, SONY has outperformed NTDOY with an annualized return of 14.19%, while NTDOY has yielded a comparatively lower 12.30% annualized return.


SONY

1D
0.67%
1M
-11.29%
YTD
-23.28%
6M
-23.76%
1Y
-19.36%
3Y*
3.05%
5Y*
0.85%
10Y*
14.19%

NTDOY

1D
-0.56%
1M
-6.24%
YTD
-36.71%
6M
-36.11%
1Y
-50.94%
3Y*
0.20%
5Y*
-5.79%
10Y*
12.30%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SONY vs. NTDOY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SONY
Sony Group Corporation
-23.28%21.65%12.49%24.95%-39.26%25.64%49.70%41.89%7.96%61.31%
NTDOY
Nintendo Co ADR
-36.71%16.19%13.11%24.66%-10.74%-27.51%61.36%50.76%-26.56%76.94%

Correlation

The correlation between SONY and NTDOY is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.42

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2001

0.33

Over the past year, SONY and NTDOY have become more correlated (0.55) than their long-term average of 0.33, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

SONY:

$118.55B

NTDOY:

$49.43B

EPS

SONY:

-¥57.09

NTDOY:

¥92.44

PS Ratio

SONY:

1.52

NTDOY:

3.42

PB Ratio

SONY:

2.35

NTDOY:

2.69

Total Revenue (TTM)

SONY:

¥12.60T

NTDOY:

¥2.34T

Gross Profit (TTM)

SONY:

¥3.88T

NTDOY:

¥921.95B

EBITDA (TTM)

SONY:

¥2.87T

NTDOY:

¥500.07B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SONY vs. NTDOY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SONY
SONY Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
SONY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SONY Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
SONY Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
SONY Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
SONY Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

NTDOY
NTDOY Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
NTDOY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NTDOY Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
NTDOY Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
NTDOY Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
NTDOY Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SONY vs. NTDOY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sony Group Corporation (SONY) and Nintendo Co ADR (NTDOY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SONYNTDOYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.91

0.76

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.55

-0.88

+0.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.97

-1.53

+0.56

SONY vs. NTDOY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SONY Sharpe Ratio is -0.65, which is higher than the NTDOY Sharpe Ratio of -1.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SONY and NTDOY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SONY vs. NTDOY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SONY drawdown since its inception was -93.18%, which is greater than NTDOY's maximum drawdown of -83.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SONY and NTDOY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SONYNTDOYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-93.18%

-83.59%

-9.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-35.53%

-58.02%

+22.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.53%

-58.02%

+22.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-50.56%

-58.02%

+7.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.56%

-58.02%

+7.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-35.10%

-57.13%

+22.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-42.17%

-37.60%

-4.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

19.94%

33.32%

-13.38%

Volatility

SONY vs. NTDOY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Sony Group Corporation (SONY) is 9.27%, while Nintendo Co ADR (NTDOY) has a volatility of 13.02%. This indicates that SONY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NTDOY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SONYNTDOYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.27%

13.02%

-3.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.34%

32.54%

-11.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.78%

39.48%

-9.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.09%

30.41%

-1.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.81%

36.42%

-7.61%

Dividends

SONY vs. NTDOY - Dividend Comparison

SONY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.41%, while NTDOY has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NTDOY
Nintendo Co ADR
0.00%0.87%0.40%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.33%0.56%1.23%
SONY
Sony Group Corporation
0.41%0.59%0.58%0.59%0.69%0.43%0.46%0.54%0.56%0.45%0.63%0.34%

Financials

SONY vs. NTDOY - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Sony Group Corporation and Nintendo Co ADR. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00T2.00T3.00T4.00T20222023202420252026
3.09T
414.65B
(SONY) Total Revenue
(NTDOY) Total Revenue
Values in JPY except per share items

SONY vs. NTDOY - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Sony Group Corporation and Nintendo Co ADR over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%20222023202420252026
30.8%
48.3%
Portfolio components
SONY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sony Group Corporation reported a gross profit of 951.43B and revenue of 3.09T. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 30.8%.

NTDOY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Nintendo Co ADR reported a gross profit of 200.11B and revenue of 414.65B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 48.3%.

SONY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sony Group Corporation reported an operating income of 292.32B and revenue of 3.09T, resulting in an operating margin of 9.5%.

NTDOY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Nintendo Co ADR reported an operating income of 60.82B and revenue of 414.65B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.7%.

SONY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sony Group Corporation reported a net income of 84.39B and revenue of 3.09T, resulting in a net margin of 2.7%.

NTDOY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Nintendo Co ADR reported a net income of 66.39B and revenue of 414.65B, resulting in a net margin of 16.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


SONY and NTDOY have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NTDOY has higher volatility (13.02%) compared to SONY (9.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SONY dropped -93.18% vs NTDOY's -83.59%.

SONY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.65 vs -1.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SONY and NTDOY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer