SOCL vs. ITB
SOCL (Global X Social Media ETF) and ITB (iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SOCL is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Solactive Social Media Index, while ITB is a Building & Construction fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Select Home Construction Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SOCL returned 9.50%/yr vs 13.75%/yr for ITB. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SOCL charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.42%/yr for ITB.
Performance
SOCL vs. ITB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SOCL achieves a -12.77% return, which is significantly lower than ITB's -2.85% return. Over the past 10 years, SOCL has underperformed ITB with an annualized return of 9.50%, while ITB has yielded a comparatively higher 13.75% annualized return.
SOCL
- 1D
- 1.87%
- 1M
- 2.93%
- YTD
- -12.77%
- 6M
- -12.78%
- 1Y
- 0.23%
- 3Y*
- 10.13%
- 5Y*
- -6.09%
- 10Y*
- 9.50%
ITB
- 1D
- 1.00%
- 1M
- 0.61%
- YTD
- -2.85%
- 6M
- -9.31%
- 1Y
- 2.93%
- 3Y*
- 7.85%
- 5Y*
- 6.63%
- 10Y*
- 13.75%
SOCL vs. ITB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SOCL Global X Social Media ETF | -12.77% | 31.04% | 5.08% | 31.08% | -42.23% | -12.84% | 78.35% | 25.74% | -16.39% | 54.65% |
ITB iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF | -2.85% | -5.26% | 2.06% | 68.91% | -26.26% | 49.25% | 26.42% | 48.70% | -30.92% | 59.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between SOCL and ITB is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2011 | 0.42 |
The correlation between SOCL and ITB shifts across timeframes, from 0.26 (1 year) to 0.44 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SOCL vs. ITB - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SOCL
ITB
Communication Services
-
Technology
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
-
Communication Services
SOCL
ITB
-
Technology
SOCL
ITB
-
Consumer Defensive
SOCL
ITB
-
Industrials
SOCL
ITB
Consumer Cyclical
SOCL
ITB
Basic Materials
SOCL
-
ITB
Energy
SOCL
-
ITB
-
Financial Services
SOCL
-
ITB
-
Healthcare
SOCL
-
ITB
-
Real Estate
SOCL
-
ITB
Utilities
SOCL
-
ITB
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SOCL vs. ITB — Risk / Return Rank
SOCL
ITB
SOCL vs. ITB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Social Media ETF (SOCL) and iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF (ITB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SOCL | ITB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.02 | 1.04 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.01 | 0.11 | -0.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.01 | 0.22 | -0.21 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SOCL | ITB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.01 | 0.10 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.21 | 0.23 | -0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.35 | 0.46 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.33 | 0.11 | +0.22 |
Drawdowns
SOCL vs. ITB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SOCL drawdown since its inception was -68.70%, smaller than the maximum ITB drawdown of -86.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SOCL and ITB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SOCL | ITB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.70% | -86.53% | +17.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.52% | -26.04% | -7.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.52% | -33.35% | -0.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -66.32% | -40.55% | -25.77% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -68.70% | -52.10% | -16.60% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -37.33% | -26.35% | -10.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.96% | -37.10% | +15.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.75% | 13.15% | +2.60% |
Volatility
SOCL vs. ITB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X Social Media ETF (SOCL) is 7.11%, while iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF (ITB) has a volatility of 8.06%. This indicates that SOCL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ITB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SOCL | ITB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.11% | 8.06% | -0.95% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.87% | 20.45% | -2.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.31% | 29.44% | -6.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.69% | 29.19% | +0.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.56% | 29.99% | -2.43% |
SOCL vs. ITB - Expense Ratio Comparison
SOCL has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than ITB's 0.42% expense ratio.
Dividends
SOCL vs. ITB - Dividend Comparison
SOCL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.49%, less than ITB's 1.22% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ITB iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF | 1.22% | 1.67% | 0.46% | 0.48% | 0.86% | 0.37% | 0.46% | 0.50% | 0.63% | 0.28% | 0.43% | 0.34% |
SOCL Global X Social Media ETF | 0.49% | 0.43% | 0.25% | 0.61% | 0.39% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.49% | 0.18% | 0.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SOCL and ITB have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ITB has higher volatility (8.06%) compared to SOCL (7.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SOCL dropped -68.70% vs ITB's -86.53%.
On 10-year performance, ITB leads with 13.75% vs 9.50% for SOCL. On fees, ITB is cheaper at 0.42% per year. On volatility, SOCL has been the lower-risk option at 7.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, ITB has performed better with a 13.75% return vs 9.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ITB is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for SOCL.
ITB has the higher dividend yield at 1.22%, compared with 0.49% for SOCL.
SOCL is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while ITB is Building & Construction. SOCL tracks Solactive Social Media Index, while ITB tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select Home Construction Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for SOCL and 0.42% for ITB.
ITB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.10 vs 0.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SOCL and ITB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer