SNXFX vs. FNDX
Compare and contrast key facts about Schwab 1000 Index Fund (SNXFX) and Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX).
SNXFX is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Schwab 1000 Index. It was launched on Apr 2, 1991. FNDX is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Russell Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index. It was launched on Aug 15, 2013. Both SNXFX and FNDX are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: SNXFX or FNDX.
Performance
SNXFX vs. FNDX - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SNXFX achieves a 26.19% return, which is significantly higher than FNDX's 22.09% return. Over the past 10 years, SNXFX has underperformed FNDX with an annualized return of 12.81%, while FNDX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.01% annualized return.
SNXFX
26.19%
2.43%
14.11%
33.05%
15.32%
12.81%
FNDX
22.09%
2.37%
13.74%
31.33%
17.81%
14.01%
Key characteristics
| SNXFX | FNDX | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.69 | 2.91 |
| Sortino Ratio | 3.58 | 3.97 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.50 | 1.53 |
| Calmar Ratio | 3.93 | 4.94 |
| Martin Ratio | 17.34 | 18.79 |
| Ulcer Index | 1.94% | 1.70% |
| Daily Std Dev | 12.52% | 10.99% |
| Max Drawdown | -55.08% | -37.71% |
| Current Drawdown | -0.71% | -0.73% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SNXFX vs. FNDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SNXFX has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than FNDX's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Correlation
The correlation between SNXFX and FNDX is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
SNXFX vs. FNDX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab 1000 Index Fund (SNXFX) and Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
SNXFX vs. FNDX - Dividend Comparison
SNXFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.12%, less than FNDX's 4.12% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SNXFX Schwab 1000 Index Fund | 1.12% | 1.41% | 1.61% | 1.19% | 1.71% | 1.81% | 2.29% | 1.75% | 1.81% | 1.93% | 1.64% | 1.54% |
FNDX Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF | 4.12% | 3.75% | 4.20% | 2.37% | 2.29% | 5.67% | 4.97% | 2.63% | 3.96% | 3.85% | 3.36% | 1.24% |
Drawdowns
SNXFX vs. FNDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SNXFX drawdown since its inception was -55.08%, which is greater than FNDX's maximum drawdown of -37.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNXFX and FNDX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
SNXFX vs. FNDX - Volatility Comparison
Schwab 1000 Index Fund (SNXFX) and Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX) have volatilities of 4.08% and 3.96%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.