SNXFX vs. FNDX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

SNXFX (Schwab 1000 Index Fund) and FNDX (Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF) are both funds - SNXFX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Schwab 1000 Index, while FNDX is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity US Large Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SNXFX returned 15.45%/yr vs 14.48%/yr for FNDX. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SNXFX charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for FNDX.

Performance

SNXFX vs. FNDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab 1000 Index Fund (SNXFX) and Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SNXFX achieves a 10.10% return, which is significantly lower than FNDX's 14.31% return. Over the past 10 years, SNXFX has outperformed FNDX with an annualized return of 15.45%, while FNDX has yielded a comparatively lower 14.48% annualized return.

SNXFX

• 1D: -0.37%
• 1M: 0.44%
• YTD: 10.10%
• 6M: 8.98%
• 1Y: 25.34%
• 3Y*: 21.31%
• 5Y*: 12.77%
• 10Y*: 15.45%

FNDX

• 1D: -0.42%
• 1M: 0.52%
• YTD: 14.31%
• 6M: 13.73%
• 1Y: 30.33%
• 3Y*: 20.33%
• 5Y*: 13.24%
• 10Y*: 14.48%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SNXFX vs. FNDX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SNXFX Schwab 1000 Index Fund	10.10%	17.23%	24.46%	26.53%	-19.46%	26.10%	20.71%	31.43%	-5.04%	21.71%
FNDX Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF	14.31%	16.94%	16.77%	18.23%	-6.92%	31.73%	9.12%	28.65%	-7.30%	17.12%

Correlation

The correlation between SNXFX and FNDX is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.81
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.85
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.89
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.89
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 15, 2013	0.91

The correlation between SNXFX and FNDX shifts across timeframes, from 0.81 (1 year) to 0.91 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SNXFX vs. FNDX - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SNXFX	FNDX
Technology	38.1%	22.1%
Financial Services	11.2%	13.3%
Communication Services	10.1%	9.9%
Consumer Cyclical	9.8%	9.1%
Industrials	8.9%	9.1%
Healthcare	8.4%	11.9%
Consumer Defensive	4.3%	7.0%
Energy	3.2%	9.3%
Utilities	2.1%	3.0%
Real Estate	2.0%	1.7%
Basic Materials	1.9%	3.6%

Return for Risk

SNXFX vs. FNDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SNXFX

SNXFX Risk / Return Rank: 62
SNXFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
SNXFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
SNXFX Omega Ratio Rank: 55
SNXFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
SNXFX Martin Ratio Rank: 76

FNDX

FNDX Risk / Return Rank: 89
FNDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
FNDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
FNDX Omega Ratio Rank: 89
FNDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
FNDX Martin Ratio Rank: 89

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SNXFX vs. FNDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab 1000 Index Fund (SNXFX) and Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SNXFX	FNDX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.09	2.92	-0.83
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.82	4.05	-1.22
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.53	-0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.98	5.02	-2.04
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.32	19.42	-6.10

SNXFX vs. FNDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SNXFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.09, which is comparable to the FNDX Sharpe Ratio of 2.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SNXFX and FNDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SNXFX vs. FNDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SNXFX drawdown since its inception was -55.08%, which is greater than FNDX's maximum drawdown of -37.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNXFX and FNDX.

Drawdown Indicators

	SNXFX	FNDX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-55.08%	-37.72%	-17.36%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.94%	-6.06%	-2.88%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.21%	-16.30%	-2.91%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.36%	-19.06%	-6.30%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.58%	-37.72%	+3.14%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.60%	-1.43%	-0.17%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.75%	-3.55%	-5.20%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.00%	1.57%	+0.43%

Volatility

SNXFX vs. FNDX - Volatility Comparison

Schwab 1000 Index Fund (SNXFX) has a higher volatility of 4.82% compared to Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX) at 3.33%. This indicates that SNXFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FNDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SNXFX	FNDX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.82%	3.33%	+1.49%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.03%	7.63%	+2.40%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.79%	10.47%	+2.32%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.41%	15.18%	+2.23%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.78%	17.48%	+1.30%

SNXFX vs. FNDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SNXFX has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than FNDX's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

SNXFX vs. FNDX - Dividend Comparison

SNXFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.32%, less than FNDX's 1.45% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FNDX Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF	1.45%	1.63%	1.76%	1.82%	2.07%	1.64%	2.29%	2.23%	2.40%	1.86%	2.01%	2.01%
SNXFX Schwab 1000 Index Fund	1.32%	1.45%	1.23%	1.41%	1.61%	1.74%	2.76%	3.01%	6.49%	4.23%	3.41%	6.31%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SNXFX and FNDX in my portfolio?

SNXFX and FNDX have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SNXFX or FNDX?

SNXFX has higher volatility (4.82%) compared to FNDX (3.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SNXFX dropped -55.08% vs FNDX's -37.72%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FNDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.92 vs 2.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.