PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SNXFX vs. FBALX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SNXFX vs. FBALX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab 1000 Index Fund (SNXFX) and Fidelity Balanced Fund (FBALX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with SNXFX having a 8.59% return and FBALX slightly higher at 8.64%. Over the past 10 years, SNXFX has outperformed FBALX with an annualized return of 15.29%, while FBALX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.86% annualized return.


SNXFX

1D
-1.37%
1M
-0.94%
YTD
8.59%
6M
7.12%
1Y
22.22%
3Y*
20.75%
5Y*
12.32%
10Y*
15.29%

FBALX

1D
-1.05%
1M
-0.03%
YTD
8.64%
6M
7.87%
1Y
20.50%
3Y*
15.84%
5Y*
8.77%
10Y*
11.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SNXFX vs. FBALX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SNXFX
Schwab 1000 Index Fund
8.59%17.23%24.46%26.53%-19.46%26.10%20.71%31.43%-5.04%21.71%
FBALX
Fidelity Balanced Fund
8.64%15.11%16.09%20.31%-18.29%18.27%22.45%24.40%-3.98%16.52%

Correlation

The correlation between SNXFX and FBALX is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 1992

0.93

The correlation between SNXFX and FBALX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SNXFX vs. FBALX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SNXFX
SNXFX Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
SNXFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SNXFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
SNXFX Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
SNXFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
SNXFX Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

FBALX
FBALX Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
FBALX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBALX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBALX Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
FBALX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBALX Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SNXFX vs. FBALX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab 1000 Index Fund (SNXFX) and Fidelity Balanced Fund (FBALX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SNXFXFBALXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.44

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.65

3.32

-0.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.81

15.47

-3.66

SNXFX vs. FBALX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SNXFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.85, which is comparable to the FBALX Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SNXFX and FBALX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SNXFX vs. FBALX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SNXFX drawdown since its inception was -55.08%, which is greater than FBALX's maximum drawdown of -43.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNXFX and FBALX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SNXFXFBALXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.08%

-43.57%

-11.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.94%

-6.47%

-2.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.21%

-12.88%

-6.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.36%

-22.89%

-2.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.58%

-26.68%

-7.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.95%

-1.56%

-1.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.75%

-4.37%

-4.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.01%

1.38%

+0.63%

Volatility

SNXFX vs. FBALX - Volatility Comparison

Schwab 1000 Index Fund (SNXFX) has a higher volatility of 5.03% compared to Fidelity Balanced Fund (FBALX) at 3.83%. This indicates that SNXFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FBALX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SNXFXFBALXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.03%

3.83%

+1.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.11%

7.54%

+2.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.85%

9.24%

+3.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.42%

12.27%

+5.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.75%

12.80%

+5.95%

SNXFX vs. FBALX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SNXFX has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than FBALX's 0.46% expense ratio.


Dividends

SNXFX vs. FBALX - Dividend Comparison

SNXFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.34%, less than FBALX's 5.22% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FBALX
Fidelity Balanced Fund
5.22%5.69%5.67%2.28%8.06%9.66%5.90%4.24%10.99%7.90%3.07%7.70%
SNXFX
Schwab 1000 Index Fund
1.34%1.45%1.23%1.41%1.61%1.74%2.76%3.01%6.49%4.23%3.41%6.31%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, SNXFX and FBALX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SNXFX has higher volatility (5.03%) compared to FBALX (3.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SNXFX dropped -55.08% vs FBALX's -43.57%.

FBALX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 1.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SNXFX and FBALX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer