PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
SNXFX vs. DGRO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

SNXFX vs. DGRO

Last updated Aug 4, 2026
Documentation

SNXFX (Schwab 1000 Index Fund) and DGRO (iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF) are both funds - SNXFX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Schwab 1000 Index, while DGRO is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SNXFX returned 14.79%/yr vs 13.38%/yr for DGRO. Their correlation of 0.88 means they have usually moved in the same direction. SNXFX charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for DGRO.

Performance

SNXFX vs. DGRO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab 1000 Index Fund (SNXFX) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SNXFX achieves a 10.31% return, which is significantly lower than DGRO's 13.79% return. Over the past 10 years, SNXFX has outperformed DGRO with an annualized return of 14.79%, while DGRO has yielded a comparatively lower 13.38% annualized return.

SNXFX

1D
0.63%
1M
-0.06%
6M
8.15%
YTD
10.31%
1Y
21.18%
3Y*
19.16%
5Y*
12.04%
10Y*
14.79%
ALL TIME*
10.60%

DGRO

1D
0.35%
1M
1.32%
6M
9.21%
YTD
13.79%
1Y
24.64%
3Y*
17.09%
5Y*
11.15%
10Y*
13.38%
ALL TIME*
12.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)

DGRO

iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
$107.57M$103.25M$110.55M

SNXFX

Schwab 1000 Index Fund
$0.00$0.00$0.00

SNXFX vs. DGRO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SNXFX
Schwab 1000 Index Fund		10.31%17.23%24.46%26.53%-19.46%26.10%20.71%31.43%-5.04%21.71%
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF		13.79%15.69%16.62%10.47%-7.91%26.64%9.50%29.87%-2.38%23.00%

Correlation

The correlation between SNXFX and DGRO is 0.59, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.83

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2014

0.88

Over the past year, the correlation between SNXFX and DGRO has dropped to 0.59 - well below their long-term average of 0.88, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

SNXFX vs. DGRO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
SNXFX
DGRO

Technology

37.3%
17.3%

Financial Services

11.7%
20.4%

Industrials

9.6%
11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

9.5%
6.5%

Communication Services

9.4%
0.1%

Healthcare

9.0%
17.9%

Consumer Defensive

4.4%
11.9%

Energy

3.0%
4.8%

Utilities

2.1%
7.3%

Real Estate

2.1%

-

Basic Materials

1.9%
2.5%

Technology

SNXFX
37.3%
DGRO
17.3%

Financial Services

SNXFX
11.7%
DGRO
20.4%

Industrials

SNXFX
9.6%
DGRO
11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

SNXFX
9.5%
DGRO
6.5%

Communication Services

SNXFX
9.4%
DGRO
0.1%

Healthcare

SNXFX
9.0%
DGRO
17.9%

Consumer Defensive

SNXFX
4.4%
DGRO
11.9%

Energy

SNXFX
3.0%
DGRO
4.8%

Utilities

SNXFX
2.1%
DGRO
7.3%

Real Estate

SNXFX
2.1%
DGRO

-

Basic Materials

SNXFX
1.9%
DGRO
2.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Schwab 1000 Index Fund

iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF

Often compared with SNXFX:
SNXFX vs. SWPPXSNXFX vs. SWTSXSNXFX vs. VOOSNXFX vs. FSKAXSNXFX vs. SWAGXSNXFX vs. FLCPXSNXFX vs. FEMKX
Often compared with DGRO:
DGRO vs. SCHDDGRO vs. VIGDGRO vs. VYMDGRO vs. VOODGRO vs. DGRWDGRO vs. DIVODGRO vs. HDV

Return for Risk

SNXFX vs. DGRO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.
SNXFX
SNXFX Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
SNXFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SNXFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
SNXFX Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
SNXFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
SNXFX Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
DGRO
DGRO Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
DGRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGRO Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
DGRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGRO Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SNXFX vs. DGRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab 1000 Index Fund (SNXFX) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

SNXFXDGRODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.47
2.60

-1.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.05
3.77

-1.73

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.48

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.16

3.83

-1.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.24

14.91

-5.67

SNXFX vs. DGRO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SNXFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.47, which is lower than the DGRO Sharpe Ratio of 2.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SNXFX and DGRO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SNXFX vs. DGRO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SNXFX drawdown since its inception was -55.08%, which is greater than DGRO's maximum drawdown of -35.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNXFX and DGRO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

SNXFXDGRODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.08%

-35.10%

-19.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.94%

-6.47%

-2.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.21%

-14.03%

-5.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.36%

-19.31%

-6.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.58%

-35.10%

+0.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.41%

-1.01%

-0.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.72%

-3.41%

-5.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.09%

1.66%

+0.43%

Volatility

SNXFX vs. DGRO - Volatility Comparison

Schwab 1000 Index Fund (SNXFX) has a higher volatility of 3.47% compared to iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) at 2.88%. This indicates that SNXFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGRO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

SNXFXDGRODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.47%

2.88%

+0.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.27%

7.12%

+3.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.12%

9.54%

+3.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.42%

13.79%

+3.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.74%

16.58%

+2.16%

SNXFX vs. DGRO - Expense Ratio Comparison

SNXFX has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than DGRO's 0.08% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

SNXFX vs. DGRO - Dividend Comparison

SNXFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.32%, less than DGRO's 1.89% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF		1.89%2.09%2.26%2.45%2.34%1.93%2.30%2.21%2.44%2.03%2.27%2.52%
SNXFX
Schwab 1000 Index Fund		1.32%1.45%1.23%1.41%1.61%1.74%2.76%3.01%6.49%4.23%3.41%6.31%

Frequently Asked Questions

SNXFX and DGRO have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SNXFX has higher volatility (3.47%) compared to DGRO (2.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SNXFX dropped -55.08% vs DGRO's -35.10%.

DGRO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.60 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SNXFX and DGRO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer