SNSR vs. COWZ
Compare and contrast key facts about Global X Internet of Things ETF (SNSR) and Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ).
SNSR and COWZ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SNSR is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Indxx Global Internet of Things Thematic Index. It was launched on Sep 12, 2016. COWZ is a passively managed fund by Pacer Advisors that tracks the performance of the Pacer US Cash Cows 100 Index. It was launched on Dec 16, 2016. Both SNSR and COWZ are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: SNSR or COWZ.
Key characteristics
SNSR | COWZ | |
---|---|---|
YTD Return | 1.71% | 16.47% |
1Y Return | 19.45% | 25.84% |
3Y Return (Ann) | -2.82% | 10.24% |
5Y Return (Ann) | 10.50% | 16.92% |
Sharpe Ratio | 0.92 | 1.88 |
Sortino Ratio | 1.37 | 2.72 |
Omega Ratio | 1.16 | 1.33 |
Calmar Ratio | 0.81 | 3.40 |
Martin Ratio | 2.81 | 8.07 |
Ulcer Index | 6.91% | 3.19% |
Daily Std Dev | 21.16% | 13.70% |
Max Drawdown | -38.46% | -38.63% |
Current Drawdown | -9.26% | -0.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between SNSR and COWZ is 0.73, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
SNSR vs. COWZ - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, SNSR achieves a 1.71% return, which is significantly lower than COWZ's 16.47% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SNSR vs. COWZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
SNSR has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than COWZ's 0.49% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
SNSR vs. COWZ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Internet of Things ETF (SNSR) and Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
SNSR vs. COWZ - Dividend Comparison
SNSR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%, less than COWZ's 1.83% yield.
TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Global X Internet of Things ETF | 0.61% | 0.74% | 0.82% | 0.43% | 0.21% | 1.12% | 1.25% | 1.11% | 0.31% |
Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF | 1.83% | 1.92% | 1.96% | 1.48% | 2.54% | 1.96% | 1.67% | 1.94% | 0.13% |
Drawdowns
SNSR vs. COWZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SNSR drawdown since its inception was -38.46%, roughly equal to the maximum COWZ drawdown of -38.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNSR and COWZ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
SNSR vs. COWZ - Volatility Comparison
Global X Internet of Things ETF (SNSR) has a higher volatility of 5.70% compared to Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ) at 4.08%. This indicates that SNSR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COWZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.