SNPE vs. GLDM

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

SNPE (Xtrackers S&P 500 ESG ETF) and GLDM (SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - SNPE is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 ESG Index, while GLDM is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price PM. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SNPE returned 13.94%/yr vs 18.18%/yr for GLDM. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.10% expense ratio.

Performance

SNPE vs. GLDM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers S&P 500 ESG ETF (SNPE) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SNPE achieves a 8.65% return, which is significantly higher than GLDM's -4.72% return.

SNPE

• 1D: -1.60%
• 1M: -0.30%
• YTD: 8.65%
• 6M: 7.98%
• 1Y: 27.55%
• 3Y*: 20.76%
• 5Y*: 13.94%
• 10Y*: —

GLDM

• 1D: -1.91%
• 1M: -8.82%
• YTD: -4.72%
• 6M: -8.62%
• 1Y: 21.66%
• 3Y*: 28.79%
• 5Y*: 18.18%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SNPE vs. GLDM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
SNPE Xtrackers S&P 500 ESG ETF	8.65%	18.56%	23.85%	27.79%	-17.67%	31.43%	19.84%	12.34%
GLDM SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust	-4.72%	64.20%	27.08%	13.04%	-0.47%	-4.01%	25.10%	6.62%

Correlation

The correlation between SNPE and GLDM is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.26
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.16
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.12
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2019	0.10

The correlation between SNPE and GLDM shifts across timeframes, from 0.10 (all time) to 0.26 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

SNPE vs. GLDM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SNPE

SNPE Risk / Return Rank: 70
SNPE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
SNPE Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
SNPE Omega Ratio Rank: 70
SNPE Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
SNPE Martin Ratio Rank: 74

GLDM

GLDM Risk / Return Rank: 22
GLDM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
GLDM Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
GLDM Omega Ratio Rank: 25
GLDM Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
GLDM Martin Ratio Rank: 21

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SNPE vs. GLDM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers S&P 500 ESG ETF (SNPE) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SNPE	GLDM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.18	0.80	+1.39
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.01	1.15	+1.85
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.17	+0.22
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.92	0.89	+2.03
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.28	2.40	+10.88

SNPE vs. GLDM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SNPE Sharpe Ratio is 2.18, which is higher than the GLDM Sharpe Ratio of 0.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SNPE and GLDM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SNPE vs. GLDM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SNPE drawdown since its inception was -33.37%, which is greater than GLDM's maximum drawdown of -24.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNPE and GLDM.

Drawdown Indicators

	SNPE	GLDM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.37%	-24.35%	-9.02%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.46%	-24.35%	+14.89%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.15%	-24.35%	+5.20%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.65%	-24.35%	-0.30%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.45%	-23.82%	+21.37%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.93%	-6.32%	+1.39%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.08%	9.05%	-6.97%

Volatility

SNPE vs. GLDM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers S&P 500 ESG ETF (SNPE) is 5.18%, while SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM) has a volatility of 8.16%. This indicates that SNPE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLDM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SNPE	GLDM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.18%	8.16%	-2.98%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.18%	24.22%	-14.04%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.71%	27.36%	-14.65%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.21%	18.15%	-0.94%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.68%	17.02%	+2.66%

SNPE vs. GLDM - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SNPE and GLDM have an expense ratio of 0.10%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

SNPE vs. GLDM - Dividend Comparison

SNPE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.97%, while GLDM has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
GLDM SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SNPE Xtrackers S&P 500 ESG ETF	0.97%	1.01%	1.17%	1.32%	1.65%	1.08%	1.42%	1.20%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SNPE and GLDM in my portfolio?

SNPE and GLDM have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SNPE or GLDM?

GLDM has higher volatility (8.16%) compared to SNPE (5.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SNPE dropped -33.37% vs GLDM's -24.35%.

Which ETF is better, SNPE or GLDM?

On 5-year performance, GLDM leads with 18.18% vs 13.94% for SNPE. Both ETFs have the same 0.10% expense ratio. On volatility, SNPE has been the lower-risk option at 5.18%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SNPE or GLDM?

Over the 5-year period, GLDM has performed better with a 18.18% return vs 13.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SNPE or GLDM?

SNPE and GLDM have the same expense ratio: 0.10% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SNPE or GLDM?

SNPE has the higher dividend yield at 0.97%, compared with 0.00% for GLDM.

What is the main difference between SNPE and GLDM?

SNPE is categorized as S&P 500, while GLDM is Gold. SNPE tracks S&P 500 ESG Index, while GLDM tracks LBMA Gold Price PM. They also come from different issuers: Deutsche Bank and State Street.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SNPE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.18 vs 0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.