SNLN vs. ANGL
Compare and contrast key facts about Highland iBoxx Senior Loan ETF (SNLN) and VanEck Vectors Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF (ANGL).
SNLN and ANGL are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SNLN is a passively managed fund by Highland Capital Management that tracks the performance of the Markit iBoxx USD Liquid Leveraged Loan Index. It was launched on Nov 8, 2012. ANGL is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the BofA Merrill Lynch US Fallen Angel High Yield Index. It was launched on Apr 10, 2012. Both SNLN and ANGL are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: SNLN or ANGL.
Key characteristics
| SNLN | ANGL |
|---|
Correlation
The correlation between SNLN and ANGL is 0.27, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
SNLN vs. ANGL - Performance Comparison
The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SNLN vs. ANGL - Expense Ratio Comparison
SNLN has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than ANGL's 0.35% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
SNLN vs. ANGL - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Highland iBoxx Senior Loan ETF (SNLN) and VanEck Vectors Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF (ANGL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
SNLN vs. ANGL - Dividend Comparison
SNLN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ANGL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.06%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SNLN Highland iBoxx Senior Loan ETF | 0.00% | 8.22% | 4.88% | 2.83% | 3.21% | 4.72% | 5.03% | 4.75% | 4.36% | 4.36% | 4.41% | 5.30% |
ANGL VanEck Vectors Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF | 6.06% | 5.27% | 4.72% | 3.90% | 4.67% | 5.20% | 6.00% | 5.25% | 5.79% | 5.82% | 6.80% | 6.10% |
Drawdowns
SNLN vs. ANGL - Drawdown Comparison
Volatility
SNLN vs. ANGL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Highland iBoxx Senior Loan ETF (SNLN) is 0.00%, while VanEck Vectors Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF (ANGL) has a volatility of 1.28%. This indicates that SNLN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ANGL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.