PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
SNA vs. GPC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


SNAGPC
YTD Return26.94%-9.75%
1Y Return39.08%-6.78%
3Y Return (Ann)21.92%-0.62%
5Y Return (Ann)19.71%5.80%
10Y Return (Ann)12.74%5.01%
Sharpe Ratio1.63-0.20
Sortino Ratio2.23-0.05
Omega Ratio1.350.99
Calmar Ratio2.90-0.17
Martin Ratio6.77-0.56
Ulcer Index5.75%11.30%
Daily Std Dev23.94%31.42%
Max Drawdown-65.76%-54.89%
Current Drawdown0.00%-31.54%

Fundamentals


SNAGPC
Market Cap$18.86B$17.02B
EPS$19.80$7.72
PE Ratio18.1415.86
PEG Ratio2.434.95
Total Revenue (TTM)$5.00B$23.30B
Gross Profit (TTM)$2.57B$8.30B
EBITDA (TTM)$1.45B$1.90B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.5

The correlation between SNA and GPC is 0.46, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

SNA vs. GPC - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, SNA achieves a 26.94% return, which is significantly higher than GPC's -9.75% return. Over the past 10 years, SNA has outperformed GPC with an annualized return of 12.74%, while GPC has yielded a comparatively lower 5.01% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
29.63%
-20.03%
SNA
GPC

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

SNA vs. GPC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Snap-on Incorporated (SNA) and Genuine Parts Company (GPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SNA
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for SNA, currently valued at 1.63, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.63
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for SNA, currently valued at 2.23, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.002.23
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for SNA, currently valued at 1.35, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.35
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for SNA, currently valued at 2.90, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.002.90
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for SNA, currently valued at 6.77, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.006.77
GPC
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for GPC, currently valued at -0.20, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.00-0.20
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for GPC, currently valued at -0.05, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.00-0.05
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for GPC, currently valued at 0.99, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.000.99
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for GPC, currently valued at -0.17, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.17
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for GPC, currently valued at -0.56, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.00-0.56

SNA vs. GPC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SNA Sharpe Ratio is 1.63, which is higher than the GPC Sharpe Ratio of -0.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SNA and GPC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.500.000.501.001.50JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
1.63
-0.20
SNA
GPC

Dividends

SNA vs. GPC - Dividend Comparison

SNA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.07%, less than GPC's 3.23% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
SNA
Snap-on Incorporated
2.07%2.33%2.57%2.37%2.61%2.32%2.35%1.69%1.48%1.28%1.35%1.44%
GPC
Genuine Parts Company
3.23%2.74%2.06%2.33%3.15%2.87%3.00%2.84%2.75%2.86%2.16%2.58%

Drawdowns

SNA vs. GPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SNA drawdown since its inception was -65.76%, which is greater than GPC's maximum drawdown of -54.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNA and GPC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember0
-31.54%
SNA
GPC

Volatility

SNA vs. GPC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Snap-on Incorporated (SNA) is 11.05%, while Genuine Parts Company (GPC) has a volatility of 25.80%. This indicates that SNA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
11.05%
25.80%
SNA
GPC

Financials

SNA vs. GPC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Snap-on Incorporated and Genuine Parts Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items