SNA vs. GPC

Last updated Apr 3, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Snap-on Incorporated (SNA) and Genuine Parts Company (GPC).

Performance

SNA vs. GPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Snap-on Incorporated (SNA) and Genuine Parts Company (GPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

SNA vs. GPC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SNA Snap-on Incorporated	6.76%	4.28%	20.67%	29.70%	8.91%	28.83%	4.03%	19.54%	-14.86%	3.64%
GPC Genuine Parts Company	-15.08%	8.70%	-13.22%	-18.12%	26.82%	43.39%	-2.19%	14.05%	4.11%	2.45%

Fundamentals

EPS SNA : $19.12 GPC : $0.47
PE Ratio SNA : 19.12 GPC : 218.37
PS Ratio SNA : 3.79 GPC : 0.59
Total Revenue (TTM) SNA : $5.12B GPC : $24.30B
Gross Profit (TTM) SNA : $2.65B GPC : $8.94B
EBITDA (TTM) SNA : $1.49B GPC : $753.70M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SNA achieves a 6.76% return, which is significantly higher than GPC's -15.08% return. Over the past 10 years, SNA has outperformed GPC with an annualized return of 11.62%, while GPC has yielded a comparatively lower 3.47% annualized return.

SNA

• 1D: -0.39%
• 1M: -4.76%
• YTD: 6.76%
• 6M: 6.16%
• 1Y: 9.74%
• 3Y*: 17.05%
• 5Y*: 12.40%
• 10Y*: 11.62%

GPC

• 1D: -1.63%
• 1M: -10.31%
• YTD: -15.08%
• 6M: -25.03%
• 1Y: -10.97%
• 3Y*: -12.39%
• 5Y*: 0.39%
• 10Y*: 3.47%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

SNA vs. GPC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SNA

SNA Risk / Return Rank: 53
SNA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
SNA Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
SNA Omega Ratio Rank: 46
SNA Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
SNA Martin Ratio Rank: 60

GPC

GPC Risk / Return Rank: 24
GPC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
GPC Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
GPC Omega Ratio Rank: 21
GPC Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
GPC Martin Ratio Rank: 24

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SNA vs. GPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Snap-on Incorporated (SNA) and Genuine Parts Company (GPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SNA	GPC	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.41	-0.37	+0.78
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.76	-0.32	+1.08
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.10	0.96	+0.14
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.73	-0.28	+1.01
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	2.20	-0.88	+3.08
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SNA vs. GPC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SNA Sharpe Ratio is 0.41, which is higher than the GPC Sharpe Ratio of -0.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SNA and GPC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SNA	GPC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.41	-0.37	+0.78
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.53	0.01	+0.51
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.43	0.12	+0.31
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.41	0.38	+0.03

Correlation

The correlation between SNA and GPC is 0.46, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

SNA vs. GPC - Dividend Comparison

SNA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.51%, less than GPC's 4.01% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SNA Snap-on Incorporated	2.51%	2.57%	2.27%	2.33%	2.57%	2.37%	2.61%	2.32%	2.35%	1.69%	1.48%	1.28%
GPC Genuine Parts Company	4.01%	3.35%	3.43%	2.74%	2.06%	2.33%	3.15%	2.87%	3.00%	2.84%	2.75%	2.86%

Drawdowns

SNA vs. GPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SNA drawdown since its inception was -65.76%, which is greater than GPC's maximum drawdown of -54.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNA and GPC.

Drawdown Indicators

	SNA	GPC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-65.76%	-54.89%	-10.87%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.26%	-34.84%	+21.58%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.04%	-43.40%	+20.36%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-47.38%	-54.89%	+7.51%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.16%	-39.24%	+33.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.92%	-10.17%	-3.75%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.82%	11.08%	-6.26%

Volatility

SNA vs. GPC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Snap-on Incorporated (SNA) is 5.30%, while Genuine Parts Company (GPC) has a volatility of 8.81%. This indicates that SNA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SNA	GPC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.30%	8.81%	-3.51%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.76%	23.40%	-10.64%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.98%	29.95%	-5.97%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.64%	26.62%	-2.98%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.05%	27.93%	-0.88%

Financials

SNA vs. GPC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Snap-on Incorporated and Genuine Parts Company over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

SNA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Snap-on Incorporated reported a gross profit of 674.80M and revenue of 1.29B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 52.2%.

GPC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Genuine Parts Company reported a gross profit of 2.10B and revenue of 6.01B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 35.0%.

SNA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Snap-on Incorporated reported an operating income of 347.40M and revenue of 1.29B, resulting in an operating margin of 26.9%.

GPC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Genuine Parts Company reported an operating income of -38.43M and revenue of 6.01B, resulting in an operating margin of -0.6%.

SNA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Snap-on Incorporated reported a net income of 265.40M and revenue of 1.29B, resulting in a net margin of 20.5%.

GPC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Genuine Parts Company reported a net income of -609.50M and revenue of 6.01B, resulting in a net margin of -10.1%.