PortfoliosLab logo
SN vs. AFRM
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between SN and AFRM is 0.44, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

SN vs. AFRM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SharkNinja Inc. (SN) and Affirm Holdings, Inc. (AFRM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

50.00%100.00%150.00%200.00%250.00%300.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
123.22%
139.35%
SN
AFRM

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

SN:

0.54

AFRM:

0.39

Sortino Ratio

SN:

1.26

AFRM:

1.26

Omega Ratio

SN:

1.20

AFRM:

1.15

Calmar Ratio

SN:

0.89

AFRM:

0.38

Martin Ratio

SN:

2.73

AFRM:

1.46

Ulcer Index

SN:

13.83%

AFRM:

22.57%

Daily Std Dev

SN:

54.92%

AFRM:

86.63%

Max Drawdown

SN:

-42.64%

AFRM:

-94.71%

Current Drawdown

SN:

-19.39%

AFRM:

-72.46%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

SN:

$11.81B

AFRM:

$16.75B

EPS

SN:

$3.11

AFRM:

-$0.62

PS Ratio

SN:

2.14

AFRM:

5.95

PB Ratio

SN:

6.10

AFRM:

5.99

Total Revenue (TTM)

SN:

$4.46B

AFRM:

$2.22B

Gross Profit (TTM)

SN:

$2.13B

AFRM:

$1.64B

EBITDA (TTM)

SN:

$573.28M

AFRM:

$304.17M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SN achieves a -5.25% return, which is significantly higher than AFRM's -23.79% return.


SN

YTD

-5.25%

1M

17.14%

6M

-11.54%

1Y

29.29%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

AFRM

YTD

-23.79%

1M

4.76%

6M

-0.15%

1Y

33.32%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

SN vs. AFRM — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SN
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of SN is 7676
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of SN is 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of SN is 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of SN is 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of SN is 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of SN is 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

AFRM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of AFRM is 6969
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of AFRM is 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of AFRM is 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of AFRM is 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of AFRM is 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of AFRM is 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

SN vs. AFRM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SharkNinja Inc. (SN) and Affirm Holdings, Inc. (AFRM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current SN Sharpe Ratio is 0.54, which is higher than the AFRM Sharpe Ratio of 0.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SN and AFRM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.004.00December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
0.54
0.39
SN
AFRM

Dividends

SN vs. AFRM - Dividend Comparison

Neither SN nor AFRM has paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20242023
SN
SharkNinja Inc.
0.00%0.00%2.11%
AFRM
Affirm Holdings, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

SN vs. AFRM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SN drawdown since its inception was -42.64%, smaller than the maximum AFRM drawdown of -94.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SN and AFRM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-19.39%
-42.69%
SN
AFRM

Volatility

SN vs. AFRM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SharkNinja Inc. (SN) is 17.57%, while Affirm Holdings, Inc. (AFRM) has a volatility of 23.44%. This indicates that SN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AFRM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%30.00%35.00%40.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
17.57%
23.44%
SN
AFRM

Financials

SN vs. AFRM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between SharkNinja Inc. and Affirm Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B201920202021202220232024
1.79B
866.38M
(SN) Total Revenue
(AFRM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

SN vs. AFRM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between SharkNinja Inc. and Affirm Holdings, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%201920202021202220232024
47.0%
69.5%
(SN) Gross Margin
(AFRM) Gross Margin
SN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, SharkNinja Inc. reported a gross profit of 839.47M and revenue of 1.79B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 47.0%.

AFRM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Affirm Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 602.21M and revenue of 866.38M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 69.5%.

SN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, SharkNinja Inc. reported an operating income of 205.12M and revenue of 1.79B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.5%.

AFRM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Affirm Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of -4.32M and revenue of 866.38M, resulting in an operating margin of -0.5%.

SN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, SharkNinja Inc. reported a net income of 128.72M and revenue of 1.79B, resulting in a net margin of 7.2%.

AFRM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Affirm Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 80.36M and revenue of 866.38M, resulting in a net margin of 9.3%.