SN vs. AFRM

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about SharkNinja Inc. (SN) and Affirm Holdings, Inc. (AFRM).

Performance

SN vs. AFRM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SharkNinja Inc. (SN) and Affirm Holdings, Inc. (AFRM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

SN vs. AFRM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
SN SharkNinja Inc.	-5.36%	14.93%	90.27%	23.82%
AFRM Affirm Holdings, Inc.	-38.44%	22.22%	23.93%	153.43%

Fundamentals

Market Cap SN : $15.05B AFRM : $16.01B
EPS SN : $4.94 AFRM : $0.81
PE Ratio SN : 21.45 AFRM : 56.27
PS Ratio SN : 3.50 AFRM : 5.44
PB Ratio SN : 5.62 AFRM : 4.51
Total Revenue (TTM) SN : $4.30B AFRM : $2.92B
Gross Profit (TTM) SN : $3.12B AFRM : $1.74B
EBITDA (TTM) SN : $1.05B AFRM : $789.93M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SN achieves a -5.36% return, which is significantly higher than AFRM's -38.44% return.

SN

• 1D: 8.48%
• 1M: -13.81%
• YTD: -5.36%
• 6M: 2.67%
• 1Y: 26.96%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

AFRM

• 1D: 6.48%
• 1M: -2.47%
• YTD: -38.44%
• 6M: -37.30%
• 1Y: 1.39%
• 3Y*: 59.60%
• 5Y*: -8.50%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

SN vs. AFRM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SN

SN Risk / Return Rank: 60
SN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
SN Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
SN Omega Ratio Rank: 60
SN Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
SN Martin Ratio Rank: 60

AFRM

AFRM Risk / Return Rank: 43
AFRM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
AFRM Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
AFRM Omega Ratio Rank: 43
AFRM Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
AFRM Martin Ratio Rank: 42

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SN vs. AFRM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SharkNinja Inc. (SN) and Affirm Holdings, Inc. (AFRM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SN	AFRM	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.52	0.02	+0.50
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.08	0.54	+0.54
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	1.07	+0.08
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.86	-0.02	+0.88
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	1.92	-0.04	+1.96
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SN vs. AFRM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SN Sharpe Ratio is 0.52, which is higher than the AFRM Sharpe Ratio of 0.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SN and AFRM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SN	AFRM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.52	0.02	+0.50
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	-0.09	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.86	-0.14	+1.00

Correlation

The correlation between SN and AFRM is 0.32, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

SN vs. AFRM - Dividend Comparison

Neither SN nor AFRM has paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023
SN SharkNinja Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	2.11%
AFRM Affirm Holdings, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

SN vs. AFRM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SN drawdown since its inception was -42.64%, smaller than the maximum AFRM drawdown of -94.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SN and AFRM.

Drawdown Indicators

	SN	AFRM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-42.64%	-94.71%	+52.07%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-30.23%	-53.86%	+23.63%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-94.71%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-19.44%	-72.81%	+53.37%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.10%	-68.94%	+59.84%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	13.54%	23.21%	-9.67%

Volatility

SN vs. AFRM - Volatility Comparison

SharkNinja Inc. (SN) and Affirm Holdings, Inc. (AFRM) have volatilities of 17.24% and 17.61%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SN	AFRM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	17.24%	17.61%	-0.37%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	31.56%	44.04%	-12.48%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	52.44%	70.18%	-17.74%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	49.23%	96.66%	-47.43%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	49.23%	96.58%	-47.35%

Financials