SMVLX vs. FMILX

In the year-to-date period, SMVLX achieves a -11.21% return, which is significantly lower than FMILX's -7.29% return. Over the past 10 years, SMVLX has underperformed FMILX with an annualized return of 6.33%, while FMILX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.22% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

SMVLX has a 1.26% expense ratio, which is higher than FMILX's 0.59% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Smead Value Fund (SMVLX) and Fidelity New Millennium Fund (FMILX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current SMVLX Sharpe Ratio is -0.62, which is lower than the FMILX Sharpe Ratio of 0.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMVLX and FMILX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

SMVLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.22%, less than FMILX's 3.93% yield.

The maximum SMVLX drawdown since its inception was -55.61%, roughly equal to the maximum FMILX drawdown of -56.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMVLX and FMILX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Smead Value Fund (SMVLX) and Fidelity New Millennium Fund (FMILX) have volatilities of 14.85% and 14.44%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.