PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
SMTC vs. QQQM
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between SMTC and QQQM is 0.62, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.6

Performance

SMTC vs. QQQM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Semtech Corporation (SMTC) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%20.00%40.00%60.00%80.00%100.00%120.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
2.86%
12.44%
SMTC
QQQM

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

SMTC:

1.23

QQQM:

1.45

Sortino Ratio

SMTC:

1.76

QQQM:

1.96

Omega Ratio

SMTC:

1.27

QQQM:

1.26

Calmar Ratio

SMTC:

1.20

QQQM:

1.95

Martin Ratio

SMTC:

6.66

QQQM:

6.75

Ulcer Index

SMTC:

14.11%

QQQM:

3.92%

Daily Std Dev

SMTC:

76.49%

QQQM:

18.21%

Max Drawdown

SMTC:

-85.40%

QQQM:

-35.05%

Current Drawdown

SMTC:

-59.37%

QQQM:

0.00%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMTC achieves a -39.56% return, which is significantly lower than QQQM's 5.28% return.


SMTC

YTD

-39.56%

1M

-50.16%

6M

3.83%

1Y

87.65%

5Y*

-5.29%

10Y*

3.10%

QQQM

YTD

5.28%

1M

3.16%

6M

12.19%

1Y

25.82%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

SMTC vs. QQQM — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMTC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of SMTC is 8080
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of SMTC is 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of SMTC is 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of SMTC is 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of SMTC is 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of SMTC is 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of QQQM is 5757
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of QQQM is 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of QQQM is 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of QQQM is 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of QQQM is 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of QQQM is 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

SMTC vs. QQQM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Semtech Corporation (SMTC) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for SMTC, currently valued at 1.23, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.001.231.45
The chart of Sortino ratio for SMTC, currently valued at 1.76, compared to the broader market-6.00-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.001.761.96
The chart of Omega ratio for SMTC, currently valued at 1.27, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.271.26
The chart of Calmar ratio for SMTC, currently valued at 1.20, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.201.95
The chart of Martin ratio for SMTC, currently valued at 6.66, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.006.666.75
SMTC
QQQM

The current SMTC Sharpe Ratio is 1.23, which is comparable to the QQQM Sharpe Ratio of 1.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMTC and QQQM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.002.003.004.005.00SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
1.23
1.45
SMTC
QQQM

Dividends

SMTC vs. QQQM - Dividend Comparison

SMTC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQQM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.58%.


TTM20242023202220212020
SMTC
Semtech Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QQQM
Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
0.58%0.61%0.65%0.83%0.40%0.16%

Drawdowns

SMTC vs. QQQM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMTC drawdown since its inception was -85.40%, which is greater than QQQM's maximum drawdown of -35.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMTC and QQQM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-59.37%
0
SMTC
QQQM

Volatility

SMTC vs. QQQM - Volatility Comparison

Semtech Corporation (SMTC) has a higher volatility of 49.37% compared to Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) at 4.97%. This indicates that SMTC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%50.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
49.37%
4.97%
SMTC
QQQM
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab