SMPL vs. STZ
SMPL (The Simply Good Foods Company) and STZ (Constellation Brands, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Consumer Defensive sector — SMPL in Packaged Foods, STZ in Beverages - Wineries & Distilleries. Over the past 5 years, SMPL returned -19.72%/yr vs -9.16%/yr for STZ. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SMPL vs. STZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMPL achieves a -43.18% return, which is significantly lower than STZ's -0.56% return.
SMPL
- 1D
- -3.39%
- 1M
- -11.96%
- YTD
- -43.18%
- 6M
- -39.92%
- 1Y
- -66.92%
- 3Y*
- -32.32%
- 5Y*
- -19.72%
- 10Y*
- —
STZ
- 1D
- -0.99%
- 1M
- -8.60%
- YTD
- -0.56%
- 6M
- -0.64%
- 1Y
- -21.28%
- 3Y*
- -16.29%
- 5Y*
- -9.16%
- 10Y*
- 0.32%
SMPL vs. STZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMPL The Simply Good Foods Company | -43.18% | -48.49% | -1.57% | 4.13% | -8.52% | 32.56% | 9.88% | 51.01% | 32.54% | 18.83% |
STZ Constellation Brands, Inc. | -0.56% | -35.99% | -7.11% | 5.83% | -6.43% | 16.12% | 17.41% | 19.85% | -28.73% | 18.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMPL and STZ is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 11, 2017 | 0.27 |
The correlation between SMPL and STZ shifts across timeframes, from 0.17 (1 year) to 0.30 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
SMPL:
$1.05B
STZ:
$23.52B
SMPL:
-$1.08
STZ:
$11.23
SMPL:
0.79
STZ:
2.59
SMPL:
0.71
STZ:
2.80
SMPL:
$1.42B
STZ:
$9.14B
SMPL:
$469.47M
STZ:
$4.71B
SMPL:
-$125.49M
STZ:
$3.05B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMPL vs. STZ — Risk / Return Rank
SMPL
STZ
SMPL vs. STZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL) and Constellation Brands, Inc. (STZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SMPL | STZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.82 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.76 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.65 | 0.90 | -0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.97 | -0.79 | -0.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.59 | -1.40 | -0.18 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SMPL | STZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.53 | -0.71 | -0.82 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.59 | -0.38 | -0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.01 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.02 | 0.44 | -0.46 |
Drawdowns
SMPL vs. STZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMPL drawdown since its inception was -76.58%, which is greater than STZ's maximum drawdown of -67.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMPL and STZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMPL | STZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.58% | -67.39% | -9.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -69.40% | -26.88% | -42.52% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -75.54% | -51.28% | -24.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -76.58% | -51.28% | -25.30% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -53.53% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -74.40% | -47.64% | -26.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.91% | -16.57% | -1.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 42.64% | 15.18% | +27.46% |
Volatility
SMPL vs. STZ - Volatility Comparison
The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL) has a higher volatility of 12.53% compared to Constellation Brands, Inc. (STZ) at 8.45%. This indicates that SMPL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than STZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMPL | STZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.53% | 8.45% | +4.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.48% | 23.32% | +13.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 43.78% | 30.02% | +13.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.79% | 24.46% | +9.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.70% | 26.94% | +9.76% |
Dividends
SMPL vs. STZ - Dividend Comparison
SMPL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while STZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.02%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMPL The Simply Good Foods Company | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
STZ Constellation Brands, Inc. | 3.02% | 2.95% | 1.77% | 1.44% | 1.36% | 1.21% | 1.37% | 1.58% | 1.70% | 0.86% | 0.98% | 0.65% |
Financials
SMPL vs. STZ - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The Simply Good Foods Company and Constellation Brands, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
SMPL vs. STZ - Profitability Comparison
SMPL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Simply Good Foods Company reported a gross profit of 103.03M and revenue of 326.01M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 31.6%.
STZ - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Constellation Brands, Inc. reported a gross profit of 941.60M and revenue of 1.92B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.0%.
SMPL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Simply Good Foods Company reported an operating income of -213.32M and revenue of 326.01M, resulting in an operating margin of -65.4%.
STZ - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Constellation Brands, Inc. reported an operating income of 357.10M and revenue of 1.92B, resulting in an operating margin of 18.6%.
SMPL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Simply Good Foods Company reported a net income of -159.70M and revenue of 326.01M, resulting in a net margin of -49.0%.
STZ - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Constellation Brands, Inc. reported a net income of 477.70M and revenue of 1.92B, resulting in a net margin of 24.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
SMPL and STZ have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SMPL has higher volatility (12.53%) compared to STZ (8.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMPL dropped -76.58% vs STZ's -67.39%.
STZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.71 vs -1.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SMPL and STZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer