VBR vs. SMMV
Compare and contrast key facts about Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF (VBR) and iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Min Vol Factor ETF (SMMV).
VBR and SMMV are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. VBR is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the MSCI US Small Cap Value Index. It was launched on Jan 26, 2004. SMMV is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI USA Small Cap Minimum Volatility (USD) Index. It was launched on Sep 7, 2016. Both VBR and SMMV are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: VBR or SMMV.
Performance
VBR vs. SMMV - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VBR achieves a 16.78% return, which is significantly lower than SMMV's 20.56% return.
VBR
16.78%
1.03%
10.01%
30.83%
11.40%
9.32%
SMMV
20.56%
1.89%
13.63%
27.78%
5.79%
N/A
Key characteristics
VBR | SMMV | |
---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio | 1.75 | 2.26 |
Sortino Ratio | 2.51 | 3.32 |
Omega Ratio | 1.31 | 1.41 |
Calmar Ratio | 3.24 | 2.38 |
Martin Ratio | 9.87 | 16.63 |
Ulcer Index | 2.97% | 1.62% |
Daily Std Dev | 16.68% | 11.92% |
Max Drawdown | -62.01% | -38.77% |
Current Drawdown | -3.20% | -3.43% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
VBR vs. SMMV - Expense Ratio Comparison
VBR has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than SMMV's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Correlation
The correlation between VBR and SMMV is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
VBR vs. SMMV - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF (VBR) and iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Min Vol Factor ETF (SMMV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
VBR vs. SMMV - Dividend Comparison
VBR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.92%, more than SMMV's 1.52% yield.
TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF | 1.92% | 2.12% | 2.03% | 1.75% | 1.68% | 2.06% | 2.35% | 1.79% | 1.77% | 1.99% | 1.77% | 1.87% |
iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Min Vol Factor ETF | 1.52% | 1.78% | 1.67% | 1.07% | 1.39% | 1.65% | 1.72% | 1.62% | 0.79% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
VBR vs. SMMV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VBR drawdown since its inception was -62.01%, which is greater than SMMV's maximum drawdown of -38.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VBR and SMMV. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
VBR vs. SMMV - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF (VBR) has a higher volatility of 5.85% compared to iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Min Vol Factor ETF (SMMV) at 5.07%. This indicates that VBR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SMMV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.