SMLR vs. NVDA

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

SMLR (Semler Scientific, Inc.) and NVDA (NVIDIA Corporation) are both stocks. SMLR operates in Medical Devices (Healthcare), while NVDA operates in Semiconductors (Technology). Their 0.18 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.

Performance

SMLR vs. NVDA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Semler Scientific, Inc. (SMLR) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

SMLR

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

NVDA

• 1D: 2.93%
• 1M: 3.04%
• 6M: 5.16%
• YTD: 7.77%
• 1Y: 15.71%
• 3Y*: 62.93%
• 5Y*: 59.52%
• 10Y*: 64.62%
• ALL TIME*: 36.28%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation	$25.46B	$26.13B	$31.85B

SMLR vs. NVDA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SMLR Semler Scientific, Inc.	32.96%	-71.69%	21.92%	34.21%	-63.99%	-2.50%	95.83%	39.53%	330.00%	451.72%
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation	7.77%	38.92%	171.25%	239.02%	-50.26%	125.48%	122.30%	76.94%	-30.82%	81.99%

Correlation

The correlation between SMLR and NVDA is 0.13, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.13
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.25
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.31
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.22
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 21, 2014	0.18

The correlation between SMLR and NVDA shifts across timeframes, from 0.13 (1 year) to 0.31 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap SMLR : $336.36M NVDA : $4.86T
EPS SMLR : $3.22 NVDA : $6.53
PE Ratio SMLR : 6.31 NVDA : 30.73
PEG Ratio SMLR : 0.19 NVDA : 0.17
PS Ratio SMLR : 8.26 NVDA : 19.35
PB Ratio SMLR : 0.73 NVDA : 25.05
Total Revenue (TTM) SMLR : $36.96M NVDA : $253.49B
Gross Profit (TTM) SMLR : $33.54M NVDA : $187.95B
EBITDA (TTM) SMLR : -$46.64M NVDA : $192.76B

Return for Risk

SMLR vs. NVDA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SMLR

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

NVDA

NVDA Risk / Return Rank: 56
NVDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
NVDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
NVDA Omega Ratio Rank: 51
NVDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
NVDA Martin Ratio Rank: 59

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SMLR vs. NVDA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Semler Scientific, Inc. (SMLR) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SMLR	NVDA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	0.36	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	0.76	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.09	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	0.65	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	1.32	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	SMLR	NVDA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-89.72%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-20.21%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-36.88%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-66.34%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-66.34%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-14.74%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-36.07%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	9.90%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SMLR	NVDA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	12.04%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	28.30%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	36.41%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	51.87%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	49.95%	—

Dividends

SMLR vs. NVDA - Dividend Comparison

SMLR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NVDA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation	0.14%	0.02%	0.03%	0.03%	0.11%	0.05%	0.12%	0.27%	0.46%	0.29%	0.45%	1.20%
SMLR Semler Scientific, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SMLR and NVDA in my portfolio?

SMLR and NVDA have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.