SMIG vs. XMHQ
Compare and contrast key facts about Bahl & Gaynor Small/Mid Cap Income Growth ETF (SMIG) and Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF (XMHQ).
SMIG and XMHQ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SMIG is an actively managed fund by Bahl & Gaynor. It was launched on Aug 25, 2021. XMHQ is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P MidCap 400 Index. It was launched on Dec 1, 2006.
Performance
SMIG vs. XMHQ - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SMIG vs. XMHQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMIG Bahl & Gaynor Small/Mid Cap Income Growth ETF | 2.67% | 0.78% | 17.63% | 13.62% | -11.83% | 5.51% |
XMHQ Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF | 2.09% | 4.71% | 16.79% | 29.51% | -12.42% | 2.74% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMIG achieves a 2.67% return, which is significantly higher than XMHQ's 2.09% return.
SMIG
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- -5.91%
- YTD
- 2.67%
- 6M
- 0.67%
- 1Y
- 4.18%
- 3Y*
- 10.28%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XMHQ
- 1D
- 1.01%
- 1M
- -4.01%
- YTD
- 2.09%
- 6M
- -0.40%
- 1Y
- 13.46%
- 3Y*
- 14.90%
- 5Y*
- 8.29%
- 10Y*
- 12.53%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SMIG vs. XMHQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMIG has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than XMHQ's 0.25% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SMIG vs. XMHQ — Risk / Return Rank
SMIG
XMHQ
SMIG vs. XMHQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bahl & Gaynor Small/Mid Cap Income Growth ETF (SMIG) and Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF (XMHQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SMIG | XMHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.26 | 0.67 | -0.40 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.49 | 1.13 | -0.64 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.14 | -0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.43 | 1.18 | -0.75 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.38 | 4.29 | -2.91 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SMIG | XMHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 | 0.67 | -0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.40 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.61 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.35 | 0.44 | -0.09 |
Correlation
The correlation between SMIG and XMHQ is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
SMIG vs. XMHQ - Dividend Comparison
SMIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.85%, more than XMHQ's 0.59% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMIG Bahl & Gaynor Small/Mid Cap Income Growth ETF | 1.85% | 1.82% | 1.75% | 1.91% | 2.00% | 0.50% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XMHQ Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF | 0.59% | 0.64% | 5.20% | 0.73% | 1.72% | 1.00% | 1.12% | 1.22% | 1.59% | 1.06% | 1.63% | 1.34% |
Drawdowns
SMIG vs. XMHQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMIG drawdown since its inception was -19.65%, smaller than the maximum XMHQ drawdown of -58.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMIG and XMHQ.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMIG | XMHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.65% | -58.19% | +38.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.92% | -12.54% | +0.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.47% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.90% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.76% | -4.40% | -2.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.72% | -9.35% | +2.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.69% | 3.44% | +0.25% |
Volatility
SMIG vs. XMHQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Bahl & Gaynor Small/Mid Cap Income Growth ETF (SMIG) is 4.01%, while Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF (XMHQ) has a volatility of 5.99%. This indicates that SMIG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XMHQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SMIG | XMHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.01% | 5.99% | -1.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.34% | 11.42% | -3.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.98% | 20.29% | -4.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.32% | 20.76% | -4.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.32% | 20.69% | -4.37% |