PortfoliosLab logo
SMIG vs. XLG
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between SMIG and XLG is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

SMIG vs. XLG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bahl & Gaynor Small/Mid Cap Income Growth ETF (SMIG) and Invesco S&P 500® Top 50 ETF (XLG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Daily Std Dev

SMIG:

7.04%

XLG:

21.84%

Max Drawdown

SMIG:

-0.21%

XLG:

-52.39%

Current Drawdown

SMIG:

0.00%

XLG:

-9.74%

Returns By Period


SMIG

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

XLG

YTD

-6.54%

1M

4.98%

6M

-6.11%

1Y

11.03%

5Y*

17.36%

10Y*

14.04%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


SMIG vs. XLG - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMIG has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than XLG's 0.20% expense ratio.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

SMIG vs. XLG — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMIG
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of SMIG is 5252
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of SMIG is 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of SMIG is 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of SMIG is 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of SMIG is 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of SMIG is 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

XLG
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of XLG is 6868
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of XLG is 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of XLG is 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of XLG is 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of XLG is 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of XLG is 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

SMIG vs. XLG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bahl & Gaynor Small/Mid Cap Income Growth ETF (SMIG) and Invesco S&P 500® Top 50 ETF (XLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.



Loading data...

Dividends

SMIG vs. XLG - Dividend Comparison

SMIG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.78%.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
SMIG
Bahl & Gaynor Small/Mid Cap Income Growth ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XLG
Invesco S&P 500® Top 50 ETF
0.78%0.72%0.97%1.34%0.94%1.25%1.58%2.00%1.85%2.00%2.09%1.97%

Drawdowns

SMIG vs. XLG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMIG drawdown since its inception was -0.21%, smaller than the maximum XLG drawdown of -52.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMIG and XLG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

SMIG vs. XLG - Volatility Comparison


Loading data...