SMID vs. FG
Compare and contrast key facts about Smith-Midland Corporation (SMID) and F&G Annuities & Life Inc. (FG).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: SMID or FG.
Key characteristics
SMID | FG | |
---|---|---|
YTD Return | -13.67% | 0.47% |
1Y Return | 34.30% | 14.32% |
Sharpe Ratio | 0.55 | 0.41 |
Sortino Ratio | 1.16 | 0.88 |
Omega Ratio | 1.15 | 1.11 |
Calmar Ratio | 0.80 | 0.69 |
Martin Ratio | 1.60 | 1.34 |
Ulcer Index | 23.54% | 13.21% |
Daily Std Dev | 68.29% | 42.79% |
Max Drawdown | -94.34% | -37.32% |
Current Drawdown | -28.41% | -4.11% |
Fundamentals
SMID | FG | |
---|---|---|
Market Cap | $198.17M | $5.83B |
EPS | $0.87 | -$0.02 |
Total Revenue (TTM) | $52.78M | $4.38B |
Gross Profit (TTM) | $12.17M | $4.24B |
EBITDA (TTM) | $5.48M | $264.00M |
Correlation
The correlation between SMID and FG is 0.18, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
SMID vs. FG - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, SMID achieves a -13.67% return, which is significantly lower than FG's 0.47% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
SMID vs. FG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Smith-Midland Corporation (SMID) and F&G Annuities & Life Inc. (FG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
SMID vs. FG - Dividend Comparison
SMID has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.85%.
TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Smith-Midland Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.92% | 0.74% | 0.73% | 0.19% | 1.23% | 1.59% | 2.79% |
F&G Annuities & Life Inc. | 1.85% | 1.76% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
SMID vs. FG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMID drawdown since its inception was -94.34%, which is greater than FG's maximum drawdown of -37.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMID and FG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
SMID vs. FG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Smith-Midland Corporation (SMID) is 13.15%, while F&G Annuities & Life Inc. (FG) has a volatility of 18.04%. This indicates that SMID experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
SMID vs. FG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Smith-Midland Corporation and F&G Annuities & Life Inc. . You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities