SMID vs. FG
SMID (Smith-Midland Corporation) and FG (F&G Annuities & Life Inc. ) are both stocks. SMID operates in Building Materials (Basic Materials), while FG operates in Insurance - Life (Financial Services). Over the past 3 years, SMID returned 13.59%/yr vs 13.16%/yr for FG. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SMID vs. FG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMID achieves a -16.95% return, which is significantly lower than FG's -7.92% return.
SMID
- 1D
- 3.89%
- 1M
- 2.48%
- YTD
- -16.95%
- 6M
- -12.75%
- 1Y
- -2.49%
- 3Y*
- 13.59%
- 5Y*
- 6.53%
- 10Y*
- 28.58%
FG
- 1D
- 1.90%
- 1M
- 1.06%
- YTD
- -7.92%
- 6M
- -9.07%
- 1Y
- -10.21%
- 3Y*
- 13.16%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SMID vs. FG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMID Smith-Midland Corporation | -16.95% | -18.26% | 12.56% | 92.68% | -10.09% |
FG F&G Annuities & Life Inc. | -7.92% | -23.60% | -7.98% | 137.11% | -9.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMID and FG is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 1, 2022 | 0.23 |
Fundamentals
SMID:
$3.54
FG:
$3.85
SMID:
8.53
FG:
7.24
SMID:
0.04
FG:
0.13
SMID:
1.14
FG:
0.65
SMID:
$93.45M
FG:
$5.86B
SMID:
$26.04M
FG:
$1.23B
SMID:
$19.01M
FG:
$1.52B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMID vs. FG — Risk / Return Rank
SMID
FG
SMID vs. FG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Smith-Midland Corporation (SMID) and F&G Annuities & Life Inc. (FG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SMID | FG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 0.98 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.06 | -0.25 | +0.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.13 | -0.58 | +0.45 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SMID vs. FG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMID drawdown since its inception was -72.37%, which is greater than FG's maximum drawdown of -56.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMID and FG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMID | FG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.37% | -56.24% | -16.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -39.29% | -40.92% | +1.63% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -48.85% | -56.24% | +7.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -72.37% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -72.37% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -39.68% | -39.92% | +0.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.56% | -19.80% | -7.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 19.43% | 17.72% | +1.71% |
Volatility
SMID vs. FG - Volatility Comparison
Smith-Midland Corporation (SMID) has a higher volatility of 22.53% compared to F&G Annuities & Life Inc. (FG) at 10.86%. This indicates that SMID's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMID | FG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 22.53% | 10.86% | +11.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 42.59% | 31.38% | +11.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 55.64% | 36.73% | +18.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 65.15% | 43.92% | +21.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 54.52% | 43.92% | +10.60% |
Dividends
SMID vs. FG - Dividend Comparison
SMID has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.48%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FG F&G Annuities & Life Inc. | 3.48% | 2.95% | 2.05% | 1.76% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SMID Smith-Midland Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.92% | 0.74% | 0.73% | 0.19% |
Financials
SMID vs. FG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Smith-Midland Corporation and F&G Annuities & Life Inc. . You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
SMID vs. FG - Profitability Comparison
SMID - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Smith-Midland Corporation reported a gross profit of 5.52M and revenue of 23.11M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 23.9%.
FG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, F&G Annuities & Life Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 1.19B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
SMID - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Smith-Midland Corporation reported an operating income of 3.24M and revenue of 23.11M, resulting in an operating margin of 14.0%.
FG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, F&G Annuities & Life Inc. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 1.19B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
SMID - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Smith-Midland Corporation reported a net income of 2.13M and revenue of 23.11M, resulting in a net margin of 9.2%.
FG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, F&G Annuities & Life Inc. reported a net income of 244.00M and revenue of 1.19B, resulting in a net margin of 20.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
SMID and FG have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SMID has higher volatility (22.53%) compared to FG (10.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMID dropped -72.37% vs FG's -56.24%.
SMID currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.04 vs -0.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SMID and FG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer