SMH vs. XSD
SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) and XSD (SPDR S&P Semiconductor ETF) are both Semiconductors funds - SMH tracks the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index while XSD tracks the S&P Semiconductor Select Industry. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SMH returned 37.68%/yr vs 31.10%/yr for XSD. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.35% expense ratio.
Performance
SMH vs. XSD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMH achieves a 77.13% return, which is significantly lower than XSD's 102.14% return. Over the past 10 years, SMH has outperformed XSD with an annualized return of 37.68%, while XSD has yielded a comparatively lower 31.10% annualized return.
SMH
- 1D
- 0.90%
- 1M
- 25.87%
- YTD
- 77.13%
- 6M
- 75.61%
- 1Y
- 157.20%
- 3Y*
- 64.17%
- 5Y*
- 39.21%
- 10Y*
- 37.68%
XSD
- 1D
- 1.51%
- 1M
- 30.91%
- YTD
- 102.14%
- 6M
- 92.84%
- 1Y
- 180.25%
- 3Y*
- 46.41%
- 5Y*
- 29.69%
- 10Y*
- 31.10%
SMH vs. XSD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 77.13% | 49.17% | 39.10% | 73.38% | -33.53% | 42.13% | 55.53% | 64.45% | -9.05% | 38.48% |
XSD SPDR S&P Semiconductor ETF | 102.14% | 29.85% | 10.75% | 34.87% | -30.92% | 42.54% | 61.95% | 64.66% | -6.35% | 25.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMH and XSD is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 7, 2006 | 0.91 |
The correlation between SMH and XSD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
SMH vs. XSD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SMH
XSD
Technology
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
SMH
XSD
Basic Materials
SMH
-
XSD
-
Communication Services
SMH
-
XSD
-
Consumer Cyclical
SMH
-
XSD
-
Consumer Defensive
SMH
-
XSD
-
Energy
SMH
-
XSD
Financial Services
SMH
-
XSD
-
Healthcare
SMH
-
XSD
-
Industrials
SMH
-
XSD
-
Real Estate
SMH
-
XSD
-
Utilities
SMH
-
XSD
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMH vs. XSD — Risk / Return Rank
SMH
XSD
SMH vs. XSD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) and SPDR S&P Semiconductor ETF (XSD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SMH | XSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 5.19 | 5.00 | +0.18 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 5.22 | 5.03 | +0.19 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.72 | 1.65 | +0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 10.59 | 9.75 | +0.84 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 40.63 | 33.91 | +6.72 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SMH | XSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.19 | 5.00 | +0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.13 | 0.78 | +0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.16 | 0.89 | +0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.34 | 0.44 | -0.10 |
Drawdowns
SMH vs. XSD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMH drawdown since its inception was -84.96%, which is greater than XSD's maximum drawdown of -64.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMH and XSD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMH | XSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.96% | -64.56% | -20.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.93% | -18.61% | +3.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -35.74% | -41.25% | +5.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.30% | -42.27% | -3.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.30% | -42.27% | -3.03% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -41.09% | -13.74% | -27.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.89% | 5.34% | -1.45% |
Volatility
SMH vs. XSD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) is 11.47%, while SPDR S&P Semiconductor ETF (XSD) has a volatility of 14.94%. This indicates that SMH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XSD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMH | XSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.47% | 14.94% | -3.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.29% | 27.89% | -3.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.56% | 36.39% | -5.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.01% | 38.25% | -3.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.57% | 34.96% | -2.39% |
SMH vs. XSD - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both SMH and XSD have an expense ratio of 0.35%.
Dividends
SMH vs. XSD - Dividend Comparison
SMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.17%, more than XSD's 0.12% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.17% | 0.31% | 0.44% | 0.60% | 1.18% | 0.51% | 0.69% | 1.50% | 1.88% | 1.43% | 0.80% | 2.14% |
XSD SPDR S&P Semiconductor ETF | 0.12% | 0.26% | 0.20% | 0.31% | 0.44% | 0.10% | 0.26% | 0.51% | 1.16% | 0.59% | 0.64% | 0.58% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SMH and XSD have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XSD has higher volatility (14.94%) compared to SMH (11.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMH dropped -84.96% vs XSD's -64.56%.
On 10-year performance, SMH leads with 37.68% vs 31.10% for XSD. Both ETFs have the same 0.35% expense ratio. On volatility, SMH has been the lower-risk option at 11.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SMH has performed better with a 37.68% return vs 31.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SMH and XSD have the same expense ratio: 0.35% per year.
SMH has the higher dividend yield at 0.17%, compared with 0.12% for XSD.
SMH tracks MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index, while XSD tracks S&P Semiconductor Select Industry. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and State Street.
SMH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.19 vs 5.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SMH and XSD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer