PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SMFG vs. IEP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

SMFG vs. IEP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc. (SMFG) and Icahn Enterprises L.P. (IEP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMFG achieves a 22.19% return, which is significantly higher than IEP's 8.69% return. Over the past 10 years, SMFG has outperformed IEP with an annualized return of 19.01%, while IEP has yielded a comparatively lower -4.07% annualized return.


SMFG

1D
-1.38%
1M
4.05%
YTD
22.19%
6M
19.90%
1Y
58.53%
3Y*
46.20%
5Y*
30.77%
10Y*
19.01%

IEP

1D
-0.69%
1M
-4.24%
YTD
8.69%
6M
11.34%
1Y
13.07%
3Y*
-20.36%
5Y*
-19.37%
10Y*
-4.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMFG vs. IEP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SMFG
Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc.
22.19%38.01%54.90%25.63%21.70%10.05%-11.00%19.47%-22.21%17.95%
IEP
Icahn Enterprises L.P.
8.69%8.23%-37.79%-58.78%18.76%12.87%-3.55%20.44%18.98%-1.17%

Correlation

The correlation between SMFG and IEP is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2006

0.21

Fundamentals

EPS

SMFG:

¥563.43

IEP:

-$1.15

PS Ratio

SMFG:

1.11

IEP:

0.30

Total Revenue (TTM)

SMFG:

¥15.42T

IEP:

$10.18B

Gross Profit (TTM)

SMFG:

¥8.35T

IEP:

$1.33B

EBITDA (TTM)

SMFG:

¥3.54T

IEP:

$1.17B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SMFG vs. IEP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMFG
SMFG Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
SMFG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMFG Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMFG Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
SMFG Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMFG Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

IEP
IEP Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
IEP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IEP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
IEP Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
IEP Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
IEP Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMFG vs. IEP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc. (SMFG) and Icahn Enterprises L.P. (IEP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SMFGIEPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.12

+0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.92

0.82

+2.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.30

1.73

+6.57

SMFG vs. IEP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMFG Sharpe Ratio is 2.05, which is higher than the IEP Sharpe Ratio of 0.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMFG and IEP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SMFG vs. IEP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMFG drawdown since its inception was -77.26%, smaller than the maximum IEP drawdown of -84.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMFG and IEP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SMFGIEPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.26%

-84.21%

+6.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.12%

-16.06%

-4.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.67%

-67.83%

+42.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.88%

-77.56%

+49.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.66%

-77.56%

+29.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.38%

-72.14%

+65.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-47.96%

-30.63%

-17.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.08%

7.58%

-0.50%

Volatility

SMFG vs. IEP - Volatility Comparison

Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc. (SMFG) has a higher volatility of 9.09% compared to Icahn Enterprises L.P. (IEP) at 4.89%. This indicates that SMFG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IEP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SMFGIEPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.09%

4.89%

+4.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.85%

16.09%

+5.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.81%

25.00%

+3.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.88%

41.02%

-12.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.85%

36.34%

-9.49%

Dividends

SMFG vs. IEP - Dividend Comparison

SMFG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.27%, less than IEP's 27.66% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IEP
Icahn Enterprises L.P.
27.66%26.49%40.37%34.90%15.79%16.13%15.79%13.01%12.26%11.32%10.01%9.79%
SMFG
Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc.
1.27%2.84%2.82%3.67%2.12%0.00%5.97%4.61%4.80%3.17%3.63%3.32%

Financials

SMFG vs. IEP - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc. and Icahn Enterprises L.P.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00T4.00T6.00T8.00T20222023202420252026
2.51T
2.31B
(SMFG) Total Revenue
(IEP) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. SMFG values in JPY, IEP values in USD

SMFG vs. IEP - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc. and Icahn Enterprises L.P. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
54.6%
0
Portfolio components
SMFG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.37T and revenue of 2.51T. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 54.6%.

IEP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Icahn Enterprises L.P. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 2.31B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

SMFG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 364.07B and revenue of 2.51T, resulting in an operating margin of 14.5%.

IEP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Icahn Enterprises L.P. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 2.31B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

SMFG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc. reported a net income of 191.66B and revenue of 2.51T, resulting in a net margin of 7.6%.

IEP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Icahn Enterprises L.P. reported a net income of -612.00M and revenue of 2.31B, resulting in a net margin of -26.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


SMFG and IEP have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SMFG has higher volatility (9.09%) compared to IEP (4.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMFG dropped -77.26% vs IEP's -84.21%.

SMFG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 0.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SMFG and IEP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer