SMEA.L vs. CUKX.L
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Core MSCI Europe UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (SMEA.L) and iShares FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (CUKX.L).
SMEA.L and CUKX.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SMEA.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Europe NR EUR. It was launched on Sep 25, 2009. CUKX.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the FTSE 100 Index. It was launched on Jan 26, 2010. Both SMEA.L and CUKX.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: SMEA.L or CUKX.L.
Performance
SMEA.L vs. CUKX.L - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMEA.L achieves a 3.44% return, which is significantly lower than CUKX.L's 8.10% return. Over the past 10 years, SMEA.L has outperformed CUKX.L with an annualized return of 7.19%, while CUKX.L has yielded a comparatively lower 5.67% annualized return.
SMEA.L
3.44%
-3.86%
-5.45%
8.00%
6.72%
7.19%
CUKX.L
8.10%
-2.87%
-2.45%
11.78%
5.77%
5.67%
Key characteristics
| SMEA.L | CUKX.L | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.80 | 1.21 |
| Sortino Ratio | 1.18 | 1.81 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.14 | 1.22 |
| Calmar Ratio | 1.19 | 2.46 |
| Martin Ratio | 3.20 | 6.76 |
| Ulcer Index | 2.47% | 1.75% |
| Daily Std Dev | 9.87% | 9.75% |
| Max Drawdown | -28.48% | -34.50% |
| Current Drawdown | -5.84% | -3.20% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SMEA.L vs. CUKX.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMEA.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than CUKX.L's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Correlation
The correlation between SMEA.L and CUKX.L is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
SMEA.L vs. CUKX.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI Europe UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (SMEA.L) and iShares FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (CUKX.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
SMEA.L vs. CUKX.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither SMEA.L nor CUKX.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
SMEA.L vs. CUKX.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMEA.L drawdown since its inception was -28.48%, smaller than the maximum CUKX.L drawdown of -34.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMEA.L and CUKX.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
SMEA.L vs. CUKX.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares Core MSCI Europe UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (SMEA.L) has a higher volatility of 4.62% compared to iShares FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (CUKX.L) at 4.20%. This indicates that SMEA.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CUKX.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.