PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
SMDV vs. VDC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


SMDVVDC
YTD Return15.95%14.87%
1Y Return35.89%21.08%
3Y Return (Ann)5.89%6.98%
5Y Return (Ann)6.90%9.38%
Sharpe Ratio1.702.17
Sortino Ratio2.593.11
Omega Ratio1.311.38
Calmar Ratio2.452.43
Martin Ratio7.3914.33
Ulcer Index4.89%1.50%
Daily Std Dev21.30%9.91%
Max Drawdown-34.12%-34.24%
Current Drawdown-1.26%-2.05%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.6

The correlation between SMDV and VDC is 0.56, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

SMDV vs. VDC - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, SMDV achieves a 15.95% return, which is significantly higher than VDC's 14.87% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
15.45%
5.85%
SMDV
VDC

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


SMDV vs. VDC - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMDV has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than VDC's 0.10% expense ratio.


SMDV
ProShares Russell 2000 Dividend Growers ETF
Expense ratio chart for SMDV: current value at 0.40% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.40%
Expense ratio chart for VDC: current value at 0.10% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.10%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

SMDV vs. VDC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Russell 2000 Dividend Growers ETF (SMDV) and Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF (VDC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SMDV
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for SMDV, currently valued at 1.70, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.001.70
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for SMDV, currently valued at 2.59, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.002.59
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for SMDV, currently valued at 1.31, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.31
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for SMDV, currently valued at 2.45, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.002.45
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for SMDV, currently valued at 7.39, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.007.39
VDC
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for VDC, currently valued at 2.17, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.002.17
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for VDC, currently valued at 3.11, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.003.11
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for VDC, currently valued at 1.38, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.38
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for VDC, currently valued at 2.43, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.002.43
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for VDC, currently valued at 14.33, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.0014.33

SMDV vs. VDC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMDV Sharpe Ratio is 1.70, which is comparable to the VDC Sharpe Ratio of 2.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMDV and VDC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.002.50JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
1.70
2.17
SMDV
VDC

Dividends

SMDV vs. VDC - Dividend Comparison

SMDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.59%, more than VDC's 2.56% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
SMDV
ProShares Russell 2000 Dividend Growers ETF
2.59%2.69%2.51%2.03%2.12%2.03%1.97%1.84%1.08%1.47%0.00%0.00%
VDC
Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF
2.56%2.65%2.37%2.14%2.50%2.44%2.78%2.52%2.39%2.55%1.93%2.21%

Drawdowns

SMDV vs. VDC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMDV drawdown since its inception was -34.12%, roughly equal to the maximum VDC drawdown of -34.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMDV and VDC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-1.26%
-2.05%
SMDV
VDC

Volatility

SMDV vs. VDC - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Russell 2000 Dividend Growers ETF (SMDV) has a higher volatility of 8.66% compared to Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF (VDC) at 2.77%. This indicates that SMDV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VDC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%9.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
8.66%
2.77%
SMDV
VDC