SMDV vs. RYLD
Compare and contrast key facts about ProShares Russell 2000 Dividend Growers ETF (SMDV) and Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF (RYLD).
SMDV and RYLD are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SMDV is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the Russell 2000 Dividend Growth Index. It was launched on Feb 5, 2015. RYLD is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the CBOE Russell 2000 BuyWrite Index. It was launched on Apr 17, 2019. Both SMDV and RYLD are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: SMDV or RYLD.
Key characteristics
| SMDV | RYLD | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 17.43% | 10.90% |
| 1Y Return | 37.89% | 15.13% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 6.35% | -2.01% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 7.23% | 3.72% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.83 | 1.57 |
| Sortino Ratio | 2.76 | 2.24 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.33 | 1.31 |
| Calmar Ratio | 2.60 | 0.86 |
| Martin Ratio | 7.95 | 9.32 |
| Ulcer Index | 4.89% | 1.69% |
| Daily Std Dev | 21.29% | 10.08% |
| Max Drawdown | -34.12% | -41.53% |
| Current Drawdown | 0.00% | -6.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMDV and RYLD is 0.74, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
SMDV vs. RYLD - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, SMDV achieves a 17.43% return, which is significantly higher than RYLD's 10.90% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SMDV vs. RYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMDV has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than RYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
SMDV vs. RYLD - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Russell 2000 Dividend Growers ETF (SMDV) and Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF (RYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
SMDV vs. RYLD - Dividend Comparison
SMDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.56%, less than RYLD's 11.73% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMDV ProShares Russell 2000 Dividend Growers ETF | 2.56% | 2.69% | 2.51% | 2.03% | 2.12% | 2.03% | 1.97% | 1.84% | 1.08% | 1.47% |
RYLD Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF | 11.73% | 12.65% | 13.50% | 12.35% | 10.77% | 6.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
SMDV vs. RYLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMDV drawdown since its inception was -34.12%, smaller than the maximum RYLD drawdown of -41.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMDV and RYLD. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
SMDV vs. RYLD - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Russell 2000 Dividend Growers ETF (SMDV) has a higher volatility of 8.51% compared to Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF (RYLD) at 3.44%. This indicates that SMDV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.