PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SMCWX vs. SCHG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SMCWX vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds SMALLCAP World Fund Class A (SMCWX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMCWX achieves a 12.27% return, which is significantly higher than SCHG's 6.78% return. Over the past 10 years, SMCWX has underperformed SCHG with an annualized return of 9.91%, while SCHG has yielded a comparatively higher 18.74% annualized return.


SMCWX

1D
-0.46%
1M
1.38%
YTD
12.27%
6M
12.27%
1Y
24.34%
3Y*
12.74%
5Y*
1.92%
10Y*
9.91%

SCHG

1D
0.35%
1M
4.73%
YTD
6.78%
6M
6.01%
1Y
24.63%
3Y*
25.14%
5Y*
15.67%
10Y*
18.74%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMCWX vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SMCWX
American Funds SMALLCAP World Fund Class A
12.27%14.07%2.33%18.86%-29.90%10.14%37.46%30.79%-9.75%26.85%
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
6.78%17.50%34.95%50.10%-31.80%28.11%39.14%36.02%-1.36%28.05%

Correlation

The correlation between SMCWX and SCHG is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2009

0.84

The correlation between SMCWX and SCHG shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (3 years) to 0.84 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SMCWX vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMCWX
SMCWX Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
SMCWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMCWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMCWX Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
SMCWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMCWX Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHG
SCHG Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
SCHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHG Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHG Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMCWX vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds SMALLCAP World Fund Class A (SMCWX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SMCWXSCHGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.28

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.12

1.51

+0.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.50

5.04

+3.46

SMCWX vs. SCHG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMCWX Sharpe Ratio is 1.59, which is comparable to the SCHG Sharpe Ratio of 1.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMCWX and SCHG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SMCWXSCHGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.59

1.60

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

0.71

-0.60

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

0.87

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.59

0.85

-0.26

Drawdowns

SMCWX vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMCWX drawdown since its inception was -62.46%, which is greater than SCHG's maximum drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMCWX and SCHG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SMCWXSCHGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.46%

-34.59%

-27.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.83%

-16.41%

+4.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.40%

-23.39%

+1.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.79%

-34.59%

-5.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.79%

-34.59%

-5.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.95%

-1.44%

+0.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.91%

-5.20%

-9.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.95%

4.90%

-1.95%

Volatility

SMCWX vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison

American Funds SMALLCAP World Fund Class A (SMCWX) has a higher volatility of 5.11% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) at 3.61%. This indicates that SMCWX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SMCWXSCHGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.11%

3.61%

+1.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.81%

11.62%

+1.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.82%

15.49%

+0.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.19%

22.26%

-4.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.89%

21.55%

-3.66%

SMCWX vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMCWX has a 1.02% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

SMCWX vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison

SMCWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.32%, more than SCHG's 0.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
0.36%0.36%0.39%0.46%0.55%0.42%0.52%0.82%1.27%1.01%1.04%1.22%
SMCWX
American Funds SMALLCAP World Fund Class A
4.32%4.84%0.60%0.64%0.00%9.24%1.60%4.24%7.06%4.48%0.35%6.49%

Frequently Asked Questions


SMCWX and SCHG have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SMCWX has higher volatility (5.11%) compared to SCHG (3.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMCWX dropped -62.46% vs SCHG's -34.59%.

SCHG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.60 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SMCWX and SCHG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer