SMCP vs. SMDV

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about AlphaMark Actively Managed Small Cap ETF (SMCP) and ProShares Russell 2000 Dividend Growers ETF (SMDV).

SMCP and SMDV are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SMCP is a passively managed fund by AlphaMark Advisors that tracks the performance of the Actively Managed. It was launched on Apr 20, 2015. SMDV is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the Russell 2000 Dividend Growth Index. It was launched on Feb 5, 2015. Both SMCP and SMDV are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

SMCP vs. SMDV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AlphaMark Actively Managed Small Cap ETF (SMCP) and ProShares Russell 2000 Dividend Growers ETF (SMDV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

SMCP vs. SMDV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
SMCP AlphaMark Actively Managed Small Cap ETF	0.00%
SMDV ProShares Russell 2000 Dividend Growers ETF	-5.12%

Returns By Period

SMCP

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SMDV

• 1D: 0.23%
• 1M: -2.85%
• YTD: 5.65%
• 6M: 6.12%
• 1Y: 7.66%
• 3Y*: 7.46%
• 5Y*: 3.79%
• 10Y*: 7.32%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMCP vs. SMDV - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMCP has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than SMDV's 0.40% expense ratio.

SMCP

AlphaMark Actively Managed Small Cap ETF

SMDV

ProShares Russell 2000 Dividend Growers ETF

Return for Risk

SMCP vs. SMDV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMDV

SMDV Risk / Return Rank: 23
SMDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
SMDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
SMDV Omega Ratio Rank: 21
SMDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
SMDV Martin Ratio Rank: 24

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMCP vs. SMDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AlphaMark Actively Managed Small Cap ETF (SMCP) and ProShares Russell 2000 Dividend Growers ETF (SMDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SMCP	SMDV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	0.42	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.20	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.35	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	0.37	—

Dividends

SMCP vs. SMDV - Dividend Comparison

SMCP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SMDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.49%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SMCP AlphaMark Actively Managed Small Cap ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SMDV ProShares Russell 2000 Dividend Growers ETF	2.49%	2.67%	2.68%	2.69%	2.51%	2.02%	2.13%	2.03%	1.97%	1.84%	1.35%	1.81%

Drawdowns

SMCP vs. SMDV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMCP drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum SMDV drawdown of -34.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMCP and SMDV.

Drawdown Indicators

	SMCP	SMDV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	0.00%	-34.12%	+34.12%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-9.79%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-21.23%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-34.12%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-5.58%	+5.58%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	0.00%	-5.99%	+5.99%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	3.77%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SMCP	SMDV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	4.33%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	10.67%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.00%	18.25%	-18.25%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	0.00%	18.71%	-18.71%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	0.00%	20.71%	-20.71%