SMCP vs. SMDV
Compare and contrast key facts about AlphaMark Actively Managed Small Cap ETF (SMCP) and ProShares Russell 2000 Dividend Growers ETF (SMDV).
SMCP and SMDV are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SMCP is an actively managed fund by AlphaMark Advisors. It was launched on Apr 21, 2015. SMDV is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the Russell 2000 Dividend Growth Index. It was launched on Feb 5, 2015.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: SMCP or SMDV.
Correlation
The correlation between SMCP and SMDV is 0.24, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
SMCP vs. SMDV - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
Returns By Period
SMCP
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
SMDV
2.60%
0.33%
4.35%
15.67%
5.20%
8.19%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SMCP vs. SMDV - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMCP has a 1.18% expense ratio, which is higher than SMDV's 0.40% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
SMCP vs. SMDV — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
SMCP
SMDV
SMCP vs. SMDV - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AlphaMark Actively Managed Small Cap ETF (SMCP) and ProShares Russell 2000 Dividend Growers ETF (SMDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
SMCP vs. SMDV - Dividend Comparison
SMCP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SMDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.61%.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMCP AlphaMark Actively Managed Small Cap ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 6.81% | 0.00% | 2.96% | 2.92% | 1.63% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SMDV ProShares Russell 2000 Dividend Growers ETF | 2.61% | 2.68% | 2.69% | 2.51% | 2.03% | 2.12% | 2.03% | 1.97% | 1.84% | 1.08% | 1.47% |
Drawdowns
SMCP vs. SMDV - Drawdown Comparison
Volatility
SMCP vs. SMDV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for AlphaMark Actively Managed Small Cap ETF (SMCP) is 0.00%, while ProShares Russell 2000 Dividend Growers ETF (SMDV) has a volatility of 4.22%. This indicates that SMCP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.