SMB vs. MUB
Compare and contrast key facts about VanEck Short Muni ETF (SMB) and iShares National AMT-Free Muni Bond ETF (MUB).
SMB and MUB are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SMB is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg AMT-Free Short Continuous. It was launched on Feb 22, 2008. MUB is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P National AMT-Free Municipal Bond Index. It was launched on Sep 7, 2007. Both SMB and MUB are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: SMB or MUB.
Correlation
The correlation between SMB and MUB is 0.30, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
SMB vs. MUB - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
SMB:
0.91
MUB:
0.15
SMB:
1.29
MUB:
0.22
SMB:
1.17
MUB:
1.03
SMB:
0.71
MUB:
0.12
SMB:
6.00
MUB:
0.56
SMB:
0.31%
MUB:
1.00%
SMB:
2.01%
MUB:
3.81%
SMB:
-12.64%
MUB:
-13.68%
SMB:
-0.87%
MUB:
-1.96%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMB achieves a 2.07% return, which is significantly higher than MUB's 0.89% return. Over the past 10 years, SMB has underperformed MUB with an annualized return of 1.23%, while MUB has yielded a comparatively higher 2.01% annualized return.
SMB
2.07%
-0.67%
1.65%
2.19%
0.83%
1.23%
MUB
0.89%
-1.47%
1.39%
0.82%
0.93%
2.01%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SMB vs. MUB - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMB has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than MUB's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
SMB vs. MUB - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Short Muni ETF (SMB) and iShares National AMT-Free Muni Bond ETF (MUB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
SMB vs. MUB - Dividend Comparison
SMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.17%, less than MUB's 3.02% yield.
TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VanEck Short Muni ETF | 2.17% | 1.84% | 1.32% | 1.25% | 1.51% | 1.58% | 1.49% | 1.24% | 1.13% | 1.14% | 1.21% | 1.37% |
iShares National AMT-Free Muni Bond ETF | 3.02% | 2.65% | 2.11% | 1.81% | 2.11% | 2.42% | 2.46% | 2.26% | 2.21% | 2.51% | 2.73% | 3.02% |
Drawdowns
SMB vs. MUB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMB drawdown since its inception was -12.64%, smaller than the maximum MUB drawdown of -13.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMB and MUB. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
SMB vs. MUB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck Short Muni ETF (SMB) is 0.51%, while iShares National AMT-Free Muni Bond ETF (MUB) has a volatility of 1.14%. This indicates that SMB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MUB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.