PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
SLXX.L vs. LQD
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


SLXX.LLQD
YTD Return1.55%4.35%
1Y Return10.97%16.89%
3Y Return (Ann)-3.15%-2.14%
5Y Return (Ann)-1.04%0.70%
10Y Return (Ann)2.25%2.65%
Sharpe Ratio1.822.04
Sortino Ratio2.713.02
Omega Ratio1.331.36
Calmar Ratio0.480.71
Martin Ratio7.208.30
Ulcer Index1.52%1.92%
Daily Std Dev6.04%7.83%
Max Drawdown-30.27%-24.95%
Current Drawdown-13.69%-8.09%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.3

The correlation between SLXX.L and LQD is 0.33, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

SLXX.L vs. LQD - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, SLXX.L achieves a 1.55% return, which is significantly lower than LQD's 4.35% return. Over the past 10 years, SLXX.L has underperformed LQD with an annualized return of 2.25%, while LQD has yielded a comparatively higher 2.65% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


0.00%2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%MayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctober
9.08%
8.66%
SLXX.L
LQD

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


SLXX.L vs. LQD - Expense Ratio Comparison

SLXX.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than LQD's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


SLXX.L
iShares Core £ Corp Bond UCITS ETF
Expense ratio chart for SLXX.L: current value at 0.20% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.20%
Expense ratio chart for LQD: current value at 0.15% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.15%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

SLXX.L vs. LQD - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core £ Corp Bond UCITS ETF (SLXX.L) and iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (LQD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SLXX.L
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for SLXX.L, currently valued at 1.99, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.99
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for SLXX.L, currently valued at 2.99, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.002.99
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for SLXX.L, currently valued at 1.37, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.37
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for SLXX.L, currently valued at 0.61, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.000.61
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for SLXX.L, currently valued at 7.84, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.007.84
LQD
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for LQD, currently valued at 2.19, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.002.20
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for LQD, currently valued at 3.28, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.003.28
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for LQD, currently valued at 1.40, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.40
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for LQD, currently valued at 0.76, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.000.76
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for LQD, currently valued at 8.68, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.008.68

SLXX.L vs. LQD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SLXX.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.82, which is comparable to the LQD Sharpe Ratio of 2.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SLXX.L and LQD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.00MayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctober
1.99
2.20
SLXX.L
LQD

Dividends

SLXX.L vs. LQD - Dividend Comparison

SLXX.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.56%, more than LQD's 4.25% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
SLXX.L
iShares Core £ Corp Bond UCITS ETF
4.56%4.06%2.75%2.06%2.12%2.44%2.71%2.73%2.99%3.39%3.41%3.74%
LQD
iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
4.25%3.99%3.30%2.30%2.66%3.29%3.67%3.10%3.34%3.47%3.39%3.83%

Drawdowns

SLXX.L vs. LQD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SLXX.L drawdown since its inception was -30.27%, which is greater than LQD's maximum drawdown of -24.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLXX.L and LQD. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%MayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctober
-17.87%
-8.09%
SLXX.L
LQD

Volatility

SLXX.L vs. LQD - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core £ Corp Bond UCITS ETF (SLXX.L) has a higher volatility of 2.08% compared to iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (LQD) at 1.59%. This indicates that SLXX.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LQD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


1.50%2.00%2.50%3.00%MayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctober
2.08%
1.59%
SLXX.L
LQD