SLV vs. AG
SLV (iShares Silver Trust) is Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price, while AG (First Majestic Silver Corp.) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, SLV returned 15.55%/yr vs 5.48%/yr for AG. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
SLV vs. AG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SLV achieves a 2.78% return, which is significantly lower than AG's 18.81% return. Over the past 10 years, SLV has outperformed AG with an annualized return of 15.55%, while AG has yielded a comparatively lower 5.48% annualized return.
SLV
- 1D
- -2.62%
- 1M
- 0.41%
- YTD
- 2.78%
- 6M
- 24.76%
- 1Y
- 110.59%
- 3Y*
- 45.06%
- 5Y*
- 20.76%
- 10Y*
- 15.55%
AG
- 1D
- -5.81%
- 1M
- 2.11%
- YTD
- 18.81%
- 6M
- 26.15%
- 1Y
- 181.03%
- 3Y*
- 49.83%
- 5Y*
- 2.67%
- 10Y*
- 5.48%
SLV vs. AG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLV iShares Silver Trust | 2.78% | 144.66% | 20.89% | -1.09% | 2.37% | -12.45% | 47.30% | 14.88% | -9.19% | 5.82% |
AG First Majestic Silver Corp. | 18.81% | 204.32% | -10.47% | -25.99% | -24.73% | -17.24% | 9.62% | 108.15% | -12.61% | -11.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between SLV and AG is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2010 | 0.68 |
The correlation between SLV and AG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SLV vs. AG — Risk / Return Rank
SLV
AG
SLV vs. AG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Silver Trust (SLV) and First Majestic Silver Corp. (AG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SLV | AG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.89 | 2.49 | -0.60 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.07 | 2.82 | -0.75 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.35 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.62 | 4.24 | -1.62 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.64 | 9.46 | -3.81 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SLV | AG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.89 | 2.49 | -0.60 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 | 0.04 | +0.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 | 0.09 | +0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.25 | 0.05 | +0.20 |
Drawdowns
SLV vs. AG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SLV drawdown since its inception was -76.28%, smaller than the maximum AG drawdown of -90.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLV and AG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SLV | AG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.28% | -90.20% | +13.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -42.45% | -42.92% | +0.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -42.45% | -42.92% | +0.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.45% | -76.89% | +34.44% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.81% | -80.82% | +38.01% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -37.30% | -38.18% | +0.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -44.67% | -59.21% | +14.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 19.67% | 19.23% | +0.44% |
Volatility
SLV vs. AG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Silver Trust (SLV) is 16.30%, while First Majestic Silver Corp. (AG) has a volatility of 22.62%. This indicates that SLV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SLV | AG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.30% | 22.62% | -6.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 58.31% | 56.05% | +2.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 58.90% | 73.23% | -14.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.15% | 61.33% | -25.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.84% | 61.84% | -30.00% |
Dividends
SLV vs. AG - Dividend Comparison
SLV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.18%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AG First Majestic Silver Corp. | 0.18% | 0.12% | 0.33% | 0.34% | 0.31% | 0.14% |
SLV iShares Silver Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SLV and AG have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AG has higher volatility (22.62%) compared to SLV (16.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLV dropped -76.28% vs AG's -90.20%.
AG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 1.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SLV and AG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer