PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SLV vs. AAAU
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

SLV vs. AAAU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Silver Trust (SLV) and Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF (AAAU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

SLV vs. AAAU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
SLV
iShares Silver Trust
5.77%144.66%20.89%-1.09%2.37%-12.45%47.30%14.88%7.00%
AAAU
Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF
10.48%64.06%26.91%12.96%-0.50%-4.01%25.02%18.17%9.20%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SLV achieves a 5.77% return, which is significantly lower than AAAU's 10.48% return.


SLV

1D
0.00%
1M
-16.46%
YTD
5.77%
6M
58.80%
1Y
122.46%
3Y*
45.50%
5Y*
24.10%
10Y*
16.87%

AAAU

1D
1.78%
1M
-10.64%
YTD
10.48%
6M
23.10%
1Y
52.53%
3Y*
33.97%
5Y*
22.27%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


SLV vs. AAAU - Expense Ratio Comparison

SLV has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than AAAU's 0.18% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

SLV vs. AAAU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SLV
SLV Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
SLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLV Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
SLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLV Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

AAAU
AAAU Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
AAAU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AAAU Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
AAAU Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
AAAU Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
AAAU Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SLV vs. AAAU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Silver Trust (SLV) and Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF (AAAU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SLVAAAUDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.16

1.92

+0.24

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.23

2.35

-0.12

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.35

+0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.82

2.73

+0.09

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.70

10.02

-1.32

SLV vs. AAAU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SLV Sharpe Ratio is 2.16, which is comparable to the AAAU Sharpe Ratio of 1.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SLV and AAAU, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SLVAAAUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.16

1.92

+0.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

1.27

-0.59

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.25

1.18

-0.93

Correlation

The correlation between SLV and AAAU is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

SLV vs. AAAU - Dividend Comparison

Neither SLV nor AAAU has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

SLV vs. AAAU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SLV drawdown since its inception was -76.28%, which is greater than AAAU's maximum drawdown of -21.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLV and AAAU.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


SLVAAAUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-76.28%

-21.63%

-54.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-42.45%

-19.13%

-23.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.45%

-20.94%

-21.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-35.47%

-11.65%

-23.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-44.76%

-6.01%

-38.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.77%

5.21%

+8.56%

Volatility

SLV vs. AAAU - Volatility Comparison

iShares Silver Trust (SLV) has a higher volatility of 16.96% compared to Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF (AAAU) at 10.43%. This indicates that SLV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AAAU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


SLVAAAUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.96%

10.43%

+6.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

57.27%

24.06%

+33.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

57.07%

27.50%

+29.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.27%

17.58%

+17.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.35%

16.92%

+14.43%