SLRC vs. WHF
Compare and contrast key facts about SLR Investment Corp. (SLRC) and WhiteHorse Finance, Inc. (WHF).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: SLRC or WHF.
Correlation
The correlation between SLRC and WHF is 0.32, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
SLRC vs. WHF - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
SLRC:
1.13
WHF:
-0.42
SLRC:
1.69
WHF:
-0.47
SLRC:
1.21
WHF:
0.94
SLRC:
1.53
WHF:
-0.51
SLRC:
5.07
WHF:
-1.17
SLRC:
3.02%
WHF:
6.28%
SLRC:
13.59%
WHF:
17.39%
SLRC:
-63.06%
WHF:
-57.48%
SLRC:
-3.65%
WHF:
-14.20%
Fundamentals
SLRC:
$873.96M
WHF:
$246.61M
SLRC:
$1.77
WHF:
$0.45
SLRC:
9.05
WHF:
23.58
SLRC:
2.65
WHF:
1.01
SLRC:
$238.66M
WHF:
$79.68M
SLRC:
$192.99M
WHF:
$85.70M
SLRC:
$189.18M
WHF:
$23.39M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SLRC achieves a 16.86% return, which is significantly higher than WHF's -4.70% return. Over the past 10 years, SLRC has underperformed WHF with an annualized return of 8.18%, while WHF has yielded a comparatively higher 11.23% annualized return.
SLRC
16.86%
-0.87%
4.55%
15.33%
4.80%
8.18%
WHF
-4.70%
-1.13%
-11.38%
-7.56%
6.95%
11.23%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
SLRC vs. WHF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SLR Investment Corp. (SLRC) and WhiteHorse Finance, Inc. (WHF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
SLRC vs. WHF - Dividend Comparison
SLRC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.35%, less than WHF's 13.37% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLRC SLR Investment Corp. | 10.35% | 10.93% | 11.81% | 8.90% | 9.37% | 7.95% | 8.55% | 7.92% | 7.68% | 9.74% | 8.88% | 8.87% |
WHF WhiteHorse Finance, Inc. | 13.37% | 12.60% | 11.26% | 10.03% | 11.35% | 11.79% | 11.16% | 13.23% | 11.67% | 12.37% | 12.29% | 9.40% |
Drawdowns
SLRC vs. WHF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SLRC drawdown since its inception was -63.06%, which is greater than WHF's maximum drawdown of -57.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLRC and WHF. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
SLRC vs. WHF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SLR Investment Corp. (SLRC) is 3.43%, while WhiteHorse Finance, Inc. (WHF) has a volatility of 3.78%. This indicates that SLRC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WHF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
SLRC vs. WHF - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between SLR Investment Corp. and WhiteHorse Finance, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities