SLRC vs. WHF
Compare and contrast key facts about SLR Investment Corp. (SLRC) and WhiteHorse Finance, Inc. (WHF).
Performance
SLRC vs. WHF - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SLRC vs. WHF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLRC SLR Investment Corp. | -4.69% | 5.72% | 19.15% | 20.57% | -16.13% | 14.74% | -5.63% | 16.18% | 2.78% | 4.72% |
WHF WhiteHorse Finance, Inc. | 6.62% | -15.36% | -8.52% | 6.26% | -6.23% | 25.77% | 19.14% | 20.83% | 4.80% | 21.87% |
Fundamentals
SLRC:
$1.65
WHF:
$1.15
SLRC:
8.67
WHF:
6.42
SLRC:
4.66
WHF:
3.94
SLRC:
$167.35M
WHF:
$43.62M
SLRC:
$99.90M
WHF:
$19.82M
SLRC:
$90.07M
WHF:
$0.00
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SLRC achieves a -4.69% return, which is significantly lower than WHF's 6.62% return. Over the past 10 years, SLRC has underperformed WHF with an annualized return of 7.71%, while WHF has yielded a comparatively higher 9.36% annualized return.
SLRC
- 1D
- 1.85%
- 1M
- 2.18%
- YTD
- -4.69%
- 6M
- -1.10%
- 1Y
- -5.77%
- 3Y*
- 9.22%
- 5Y*
- 5.66%
- 10Y*
- 7.71%
WHF
- 1D
- 1.23%
- 1M
- 17.62%
- YTD
- 6.62%
- 6M
- 11.48%
- 1Y
- -12.87%
- 3Y*
- -4.03%
- 5Y*
- -1.97%
- 10Y*
- 9.36%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SLRC vs. WHF — Risk / Return Rank
SLRC
WHF
SLRC vs. WHF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SLR Investment Corp. (SLRC) and WhiteHorse Finance, Inc. (WHF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SLRC | WHF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.26 | -0.46 | +0.20 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.22 | -0.51 | +0.29 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 0.94 | +0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.46 | -0.41 | -0.04 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.19 | -0.75 | -0.44 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SLRC | WHF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.26 | -0.46 | +0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 | -0.09 | +0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.27 | 0.30 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.32 | 0.25 | +0.07 |
Correlation
The correlation between SLRC and WHF is 0.33, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
SLRC vs. WHF - Dividend Comparison
SLRC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.46%, less than WHF's 14.39% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLRC SLR Investment Corp. | 11.46% | 10.61% | 10.15% | 10.91% | 11.79% | 8.90% | 9.37% | 7.95% | 8.55% | 7.92% | 7.68% | 9.74% |
WHF WhiteHorse Finance, Inc. | 14.39% | 20.72% | 18.44% | 12.60% | 11.26% | 10.03% | 13.96% | 11.79% | 11.16% | 10.58% | 11.67% | 12.37% |
Drawdowns
SLRC vs. WHF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SLRC drawdown since its inception was -63.06%, which is greater than WHF's maximum drawdown of -57.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLRC and WHF.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SLRC | WHF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.06% | -57.48% | -5.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.13% | -28.62% | +12.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.72% | -37.91% | +6.19% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.06% | -57.48% | -5.58% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.63% | -25.67% | +17.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.44% | -8.75% | +1.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.18% | 15.85% | -9.67% |
Volatility
SLRC vs. WHF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SLR Investment Corp. (SLRC) is 6.63%, while WhiteHorse Finance, Inc. (WHF) has a volatility of 10.56%. This indicates that SLRC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WHF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SLRC | WHF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.63% | 10.56% | -3.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.92% | 22.45% | -7.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.03% | 27.84% | -5.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.30% | 22.70% | -3.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.13% | 31.47% | -2.34% |
Financials
SLRC vs. WHF - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between SLR Investment Corp. and WhiteHorse Finance, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities