SLRC vs. QYLD

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

SLRC (SLR Investment Corp.) is a stock, while QYLD (Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF) is Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the CBOE NASDAQ-100 Buy Write V2. Over the past 10 years, SLRC returned 5.01%/yr vs 9.97%/yr for QYLD. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

SLRC vs. QYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SLR Investment Corp. (SLRC) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SLRC achieves a -16.68% return, which is significantly lower than QYLD's 7.65% return. Over the past 10 years, SLRC has underperformed QYLD with an annualized return of 5.01%, while QYLD has yielded a comparatively higher 9.97% annualized return.

SLRC

• 1D: -1.85%
• 1M: -3.55%
• YTD: -16.68%
• 6M: -15.59%
• 1Y: -15.88%
• 3Y*: 5.93%
• 5Y*: 1.46%
• 10Y*: 5.01%

QYLD

• 1D: -0.22%
• 1M: 1.18%
• YTD: 7.65%
• 6M: 7.29%
• 1Y: 21.61%
• 3Y*: 13.90%
• 5Y*: 8.17%
• 10Y*: 9.97%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SLRC vs. QYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SLRC SLR Investment Corp.	-16.68%	5.72%	19.15%	20.57%	-16.13%	14.74%	-5.63%	16.18%	2.78%	4.72%
QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF	7.65%	9.28%	19.35%	22.77%	-19.08%	10.41%	8.72%	22.69%	-3.07%	18.79%

Correlation

The correlation between SLRC and QYLD is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.29
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.30
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.35
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.32
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2013	0.31

Return for Risk

SLRC vs. QYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SLRC

SLRC Risk / Return Rank: 12
SLRC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 13
SLRC Sortino Ratio Rank: 16
SLRC Omega Ratio Rank: 15
SLRC Calmar Ratio Rank: 16
SLRC Martin Ratio Rank: 2

QYLD

QYLD Risk / Return Rank: 85
QYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
QYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
QYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 89
QYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
QYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SLRC vs. QYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SLR Investment Corp. (SLRC) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SLRC	QYLD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.68	2.24	-2.92
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.77	3.15	-3.92
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.89	1.50	-0.61
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.71	4.37	-5.08
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.80	24.01	-25.80

SLRC vs. QYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SLRC Sharpe Ratio is -0.68, which is lower than the QYLD Sharpe Ratio of 2.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SLRC and QYLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SLRC vs. QYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SLRC drawdown since its inception was -63.06%, which is greater than QYLD's maximum drawdown of -24.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLRC and QYLD.

Drawdown Indicators

	SLRC	QYLD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-63.06%	-24.75%	-38.31%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-22.44%	-4.97%	-17.47%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.44%	-19.06%	-3.38%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-31.72%	-24.61%	-7.11%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-63.06%	-24.75%	-38.31%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-22.44%	-2.32%	-20.12%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.51%	-3.82%	-3.69%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.86%	0.90%	+7.96%

Volatility

SLRC vs. QYLD - Volatility Comparison

SLR Investment Corp. (SLRC) has a higher volatility of 6.24% compared to Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) at 4.79%. This indicates that SLRC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SLRC	QYLD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.24%	4.79%	+1.45%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.91%	8.45%	+12.46%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.37%	9.69%	+13.68%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.36%	14.84%	+5.52%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	29.52%	15.55%	+13.97%

Dividends

SLRC vs. QYLD - Dividend Comparison

SLRC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.61%, more than QYLD's 11.71% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF	11.71%	11.55%	12.50%	11.78%	13.75%	12.85%	11.16%	9.84%	12.44%	7.69%	9.15%	9.42%
SLRC SLR Investment Corp.	12.61%	10.61%	10.15%	10.91%	11.79%	8.90%	9.37%	7.95%	8.55%	7.92%	7.68%	9.74%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SLRC and QYLD in my portfolio?

SLRC and QYLD have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SLRC or QYLD?

SLRC has higher volatility (6.24%) compared to QYLD (4.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLRC dropped -63.06% vs QYLD's -24.75%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs -0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.