PortfoliosLab logo
SLRC vs. QYLD
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between SLRC and QYLD is 0.40, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

SLRC vs. QYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SLR Investment Corp. (SLRC) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

SLRC:

0.49

QYLD:

0.30

Sortino Ratio

SLRC:

0.96

QYLD:

0.57

Omega Ratio

SLRC:

1.14

QYLD:

1.10

Calmar Ratio

SLRC:

0.67

QYLD:

0.30

Martin Ratio

SLRC:

2.53

QYLD:

1.14

Ulcer Index

SLRC:

4.87%

QYLD:

5.06%

Daily Std Dev

SLRC:

19.28%

QYLD:

19.08%

Max Drawdown

SLRC:

-63.06%

QYLD:

-24.75%

Current Drawdown

SLRC:

-9.13%

QYLD:

-10.36%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SLRC achieves a 0.20% return, which is significantly higher than QYLD's -6.31% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SLRC having a 7.80% annualized return and QYLD not far behind at 7.67%.


SLRC

YTD

0.20%

1M

4.57%

6M

2.66%

1Y

9.23%

5Y*

11.61%

10Y*

7.80%

QYLD

YTD

-6.31%

1M

0.00%

6M

-5.29%

1Y

5.62%

5Y*

8.30%

10Y*

7.67%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

SLRC vs. QYLD — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SLRC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of SLRC is 7272
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of SLRC is 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of SLRC is 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of SLRC is 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of SLRC is 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of SLRC is 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

QYLD
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of QYLD is 4444
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of QYLD is 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of QYLD is 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of QYLD is 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of QYLD is 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of QYLD is 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

SLRC vs. QYLD - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SLR Investment Corp. (SLRC) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current SLRC Sharpe Ratio is 0.49, which is higher than the QYLD Sharpe Ratio of 0.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SLRC and QYLD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

SLRC vs. QYLD - Dividend Comparison

SLRC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.38%, less than QYLD's 13.73% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
SLRC
SLR Investment Corp.
10.38%10.15%10.93%11.81%8.90%9.37%7.95%8.55%7.92%7.68%9.74%8.88%
QYLD
Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF
13.73%12.50%11.78%13.75%12.85%11.16%9.84%12.44%7.69%9.15%9.42%10.74%

Drawdowns

SLRC vs. QYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SLRC drawdown since its inception was -63.06%, which is greater than QYLD's maximum drawdown of -24.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLRC and QYLD. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

SLRC vs. QYLD - Volatility Comparison


Loading data...