SLRC vs. JEPQ
SLRC (SLR Investment Corp.) is a stock, while JEPQ (JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF) is Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the Nasdaq-100 Index. Over the past 3 years, SLRC returned 6.07%/yr vs 20.80%/yr for JEPQ. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SLRC vs. JEPQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SLRC achieves a -16.34% return, which is significantly lower than JEPQ's 10.59% return.
SLRC
- 1D
- -1.29%
- 1M
- -3.15%
- YTD
- -16.34%
- 6M
- -15.30%
- 1Y
- -15.90%
- 3Y*
- 6.07%
- 5Y*
- 1.53%
- 10Y*
- 5.06%
JEPQ
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- 2.89%
- YTD
- 10.59%
- 6M
- 10.22%
- 1Y
- 29.42%
- 3Y*
- 20.80%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SLRC vs. JEPQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLRC SLR Investment Corp. | -16.34% | 5.72% | 19.15% | 20.57% | -9.86% |
JEPQ JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF | 10.59% | 15.18% | 24.85% | 36.28% | -11.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between SLRC and JEPQ is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 2022 | 0.40 |
The correlation between SLRC and JEPQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.30 (1 year) to 0.40 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SLRC vs. JEPQ — Risk / Return Rank
SLRC
JEPQ
SLRC vs. JEPQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SLR Investment Corp. (SLRC) and JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SLRC | JEPQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.99 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.82 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.89 | 1.46 | -0.57 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.72 | 3.35 | -4.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.84 | 15.94 | -17.79 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SLRC vs. JEPQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SLRC drawdown since its inception was -63.06%, which is greater than JEPQ's maximum drawdown of -20.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLRC and JEPQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SLRC | JEPQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.06% | -20.07% | -42.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.12% | -8.82% | -13.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.12% | -20.07% | -2.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.72% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.06% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.12% | 0.00% | -22.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.51% | -3.40% | -4.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.64% | 1.85% | +6.79% |
Volatility
SLRC vs. JEPQ - Volatility Comparison
SLR Investment Corp. (SLRC) and JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPQ) have volatilities of 5.85% and 5.68%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SLRC | JEPQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.85% | 5.68% | +0.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.84% | 10.33% | +10.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.34% | 12.85% | +10.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.34% | 16.75% | +3.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.52% | 16.75% | +12.77% |
Dividends
SLRC vs. JEPQ - Dividend Comparison
SLRC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.56%, more than JEPQ's 9.97% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JEPQ JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF | 9.97% | 10.53% | 9.65% | 10.03% | 9.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SLRC SLR Investment Corp. | 12.56% | 10.61% | 10.15% | 10.91% | 11.79% | 8.90% | 9.37% | 7.95% | 8.55% | 7.92% | 7.68% | 9.74% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SLRC and JEPQ have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SLRC has higher volatility (5.85%) compared to JEPQ (5.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLRC dropped -63.06% vs JEPQ's -20.07%.
JEPQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs -0.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SLRC and JEPQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer