SLRC vs. ABR
SLRC (SLR Investment Corp.) and ABR (Arbor Realty Trust, Inc.) are both stocks. SLRC operates in Asset Management (Financial Services), while ABR operates in REIT - Mortgage (Real Estate). Over the past 10 years, SLRC returned 5.06%/yr vs 7.58%/yr for ABR. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SLRC vs. ABR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SLRC achieves a -16.34% return, which is significantly higher than ABR's -30.41% return. Over the past 10 years, SLRC has underperformed ABR with an annualized return of 5.06%, while ABR has yielded a comparatively higher 7.58% annualized return.
SLRC
- 1D
- -1.29%
- 1M
- -3.15%
- YTD
- -16.34%
- 6M
- -15.30%
- 1Y
- -15.90%
- 3Y*
- 6.07%
- 5Y*
- 1.53%
- 10Y*
- 5.06%
ABR
- 1D
- -2.69%
- 1M
- -9.16%
- YTD
- -30.41%
- 6M
- -30.85%
- 1Y
- -43.39%
- 3Y*
- -18.78%
- 5Y*
- -13.50%
- 10Y*
- 7.58%
SLRC vs. ABR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLRC SLR Investment Corp. | -16.34% | 5.72% | 19.15% | 20.57% | -16.13% | 14.74% | -5.63% | 16.18% | 2.78% | 4.72% |
ABR Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. | -30.41% | -36.65% | 3.16% | 29.73% | -20.73% | 39.42% | 10.04% | 55.19% | 30.04% | 26.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between SLRC and ABR is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 9, 2010 | 0.33 |
The correlation between SLRC and ABR shifts across timeframes, from 0.33 (all time) to 0.46 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
SLRC:
$1.77
ABR:
$0.57
SLRC:
6.91
ABR:
8.83
SLRC:
2.60
ABR:
1.13
SLRC:
$192.87M
ABR:
$940.70M
SLRC:
$139.32M
ABR:
$829.57M
SLRC:
$143.65M
ABR:
$878.83M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SLRC vs. ABR — Risk / Return Rank
SLRC
ABR
SLRC vs. ABR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SLR Investment Corp. (SLRC) and Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. (ABR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SLRC | ABR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.70 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.89 | 0.81 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.72 | -0.79 | +0.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.84 | -1.49 | -0.36 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SLRC vs. ABR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SLRC drawdown since its inception was -63.06%, smaller than the maximum ABR drawdown of -97.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLRC and ABR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SLRC | ABR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.06% | -97.76% | +34.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.12% | -55.18% | +33.06% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.12% | -59.87% | +37.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.72% | -59.87% | +28.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.06% | -72.76% | +9.70% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.12% | -59.87% | +37.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.51% | -41.88% | +34.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.64% | 29.23% | -20.59% |
Volatility
SLRC vs. ABR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SLR Investment Corp. (SLRC) is 5.85%, while Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. (ABR) has a volatility of 11.73%. This indicates that SLRC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ABR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SLRC | ABR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.85% | 11.73% | -5.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.84% | 33.88% | -13.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.34% | 41.44% | -18.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.34% | 37.13% | -16.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.52% | 40.49% | -10.97% |
Dividends
SLRC vs. ABR - Dividend Comparison
SLRC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.56%, less than ABR's 21.15% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ABR Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. | 21.15% | 17.14% | 12.42% | 11.07% | 11.68% | 7.53% | 8.67% | 7.94% | 11.22% | 8.33% | 8.31% | 8.11% |
SLRC SLR Investment Corp. | 12.56% | 10.61% | 10.15% | 10.91% | 11.79% | 8.90% | 9.37% | 7.95% | 8.55% | 7.92% | 7.68% | 9.74% |
Financials
SLRC vs. ABR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between SLR Investment Corp. and Arbor Realty Trust, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
SLRC vs. ABR - Profitability Comparison
SLRC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, SLR Investment Corp. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 49.29M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
ABR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. reported a gross profit of -21.94M and revenue of 25.74M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -85.3%.
SLRC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, SLR Investment Corp. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 49.29M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
ABR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. reported an operating income of 8.06M and revenue of 25.74M, resulting in an operating margin of 31.3%.
SLRC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, SLR Investment Corp. reported a net income of 0.00 and revenue of 49.29M, resulting in a net margin of 0.0%.
ABR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. reported a net income of 12.92M and revenue of 25.74M, resulting in a net margin of 50.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
SLRC and ABR have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ABR has higher volatility (11.73%) compared to SLRC (5.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLRC dropped -63.06% vs ABR's -97.76%.
SLRC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.69 vs -1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SLRC and ABR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer