SLNG vs. ET

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Stabilis Solutions, Inc. (SLNG) and Energy Transfer LP (ET).

Performance

SLNG vs. ET - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Stabilis Solutions, Inc. (SLNG) and Energy Transfer LP (ET). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

SLNG vs. ET - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SLNG Stabilis Solutions, Inc.	-2.42%	-14.95%	28.92%	-21.92%	25.65%	53.82%	-41.49%	-32.47%	-42.00%	-3.23%
ET Energy Transfer LP	17.51%	-9.37%	53.87%	27.87%	55.74%	42.96%	-44.92%	5.88%	-17.74%	-4.66%

Fundamentals

EPS SLNG : -$0.11 ET : $1.37
PS Ratio SLNG : 0.81 ET : 0.82
Total Revenue (TTM) SLNG : $68.25M ET : $82.63B
Gross Profit (TTM) SLNG : $19.88M ET : $18.01B
EBITDA (TTM) SLNG : -$4.99M ET : $14.93B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SLNG achieves a -2.42% return, which is significantly lower than ET's 17.51% return. Over the past 10 years, SLNG has underperformed ET with an annualized return of -11.34%, while ET has yielded a comparatively higher 20.33% annualized return.

SLNG

• 1D: -0.45%
• 1M: -24.23%
• YTD: -2.42%
• 6M: -0.67%
• 1Y: -7.88%
• 3Y*: 6.73%
• 5Y*: -8.17%
• 10Y*: -11.34%

ET

• 1D: -1.45%
• 1M: -0.42%
• YTD: 17.51%
• 6M: 16.34%
• 1Y: 9.61%
• 3Y*: 24.91%
• 5Y*: 29.13%
• 10Y*: 20.33%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

SLNG vs. ET — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SLNG

SLNG Risk / Return Rank: 36
SLNG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
SLNG Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
SLNG Omega Ratio Rank: 37
SLNG Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
SLNG Martin Ratio Rank: 34

ET

ET Risk / Return Rank: 53
ET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
ET Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
ET Omega Ratio Rank: 48
ET Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
ET Martin Ratio Rank: 57

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SLNG vs. ET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Stabilis Solutions, Inc. (SLNG) and Energy Transfer LP (ET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SLNG	ET	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.11	0.41	-0.52
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.36	0.72	-0.36
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.04	1.10	-0.05
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.18	0.60	-0.79
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.40	1.67	-2.07
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SLNG vs. ET - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SLNG Sharpe Ratio is -0.11, which is lower than the ET Sharpe Ratio of 0.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SLNG and ET, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SLNG	ET	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.11	0.41	-0.52
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.11	1.15	-1.26
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.10	0.56	-0.65
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.10	0.35	-0.46

Correlation

The correlation between SLNG and ET is 0.09, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

SLNG vs. ET - Dividend Comparison

SLNG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.97%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SLNG Stabilis Solutions, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
ET Energy Transfer LP	6.97%	7.97%	6.51%	8.95%	7.33%	7.41%	17.27%	9.51%	9.24%	6.66%	5.90%	7.42%

Drawdowns

SLNG vs. ET - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SLNG drawdown since its inception was -98.96%, which is greater than ET's maximum drawdown of -87.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLNG and ET.

Drawdown Indicators

	SLNG	ET	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-98.96%	-87.81%	-11.15%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-46.11%	-17.33%	-28.78%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-72.34%	-25.82%	-46.52%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-97.09%	-72.82%	-24.27%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-95.00%	-3.30%	-91.70%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-74.66%	-25.95%	-48.71%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	21.40%	6.24%	+15.16%

Volatility

SLNG vs. ET - Volatility Comparison

Stabilis Solutions, Inc. (SLNG) has a higher volatility of 36.86% compared to Energy Transfer LP (ET) at 5.02%. This indicates that SLNG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SLNG	ET	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	36.86%	5.02%	+31.84%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	51.11%	11.78%	+39.33%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	70.88%	23.83%	+47.05%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	76.08%	25.47%	+50.61%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	117.81%	36.63%	+81.18%

Financials

SLNG vs. ET - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Stabilis Solutions, Inc. and Energy Transfer LP over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

SLNG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Stabilis Solutions, Inc. reported a gross profit of 8.87M and revenue of 13.27M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 66.8%.

ET - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Energy Transfer LP reported a gross profit of 5.78B and revenue of 22.41B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 25.8%.

SLNG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Stabilis Solutions, Inc. reported an operating income of 546.00K and revenue of 13.27M, resulting in an operating margin of 4.1%.

ET - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Energy Transfer LP reported an operating income of 2.37B and revenue of 22.41B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.6%.

SLNG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Stabilis Solutions, Inc. reported a net income of -262.00K and revenue of 13.27M, resulting in a net margin of -2.0%.

ET - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Energy Transfer LP reported a net income of 1.46B and revenue of 22.41B, resulting in a net margin of 6.5%.