PortfoliosLab logo
SLNG vs. ET
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between SLNG and ET is 0.11, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

SLNG vs. ET - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Stabilis Solutions, Inc. (SLNG) and Energy Transfer LP (ET). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

SLNG:

0.48

ET:

0.82

Sortino Ratio

SLNG:

1.11

ET:

1.22

Omega Ratio

SLNG:

1.15

ET:

1.17

Calmar Ratio

SLNG:

0.32

ET:

0.89

Martin Ratio

SLNG:

1.72

ET:

2.87

Ulcer Index

SLNG:

18.03%

ET:

7.60%

Daily Std Dev

SLNG:

65.72%

ET:

27.54%

Max Drawdown

SLNG:

-98.96%

ET:

-87.81%

Current Drawdown

SLNG:

-93.85%

ET:

-11.56%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

SLNG:

$102.28M

ET:

$59.85B

EPS

SLNG:

$0.25

ET:

$1.32

PE Ratio

SLNG:

22.00

ET:

13.21

PS Ratio

SLNG:

1.40

ET:

0.73

PB Ratio

SLNG:

1.62

ET:

1.64

Total Revenue (TTM)

SLNG:

$70.86M

ET:

$82.06B

Gross Profit (TTM)

SLNG:

$15.95M

ET:

$14.68B

EBITDA (TTM)

SLNG:

$9.25M

ET:

$13.56B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SLNG achieves a 2.06% return, which is significantly higher than ET's -4.83% return. Over the past 10 years, SLNG has underperformed ET with an annualized return of -19.22%, while ET has yielded a comparatively higher 1.90% annualized return.


SLNG

YTD

2.06%

1M

36.16%

6M

13.99%

1Y

31.19%

5Y*

22.85%

10Y*

-19.22%

ET

YTD

-4.83%

1M

12.35%

6M

9.35%

1Y

22.49%

5Y*

32.09%

10Y*

1.90%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

SLNG vs. ET — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SLNG
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of SLNG is 6868
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of SLNG is 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of SLNG is 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of SLNG is 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of SLNG is 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of SLNG is 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

ET
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ET is 7676
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ET is 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ET is 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ET is 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ET is 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ET is 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

SLNG vs. ET - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Stabilis Solutions, Inc. (SLNG) and Energy Transfer LP (ET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current SLNG Sharpe Ratio is 0.48, which is lower than the ET Sharpe Ratio of 0.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SLNG and ET, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

SLNG vs. ET - Dividend Comparison

SLNG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.20%.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
SLNG
Stabilis Solutions, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ET
Energy Transfer LP
7.20%6.51%8.96%7.33%7.44%17.28%9.51%9.24%6.66%5.90%7.42%2.61%

Drawdowns

SLNG vs. ET - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SLNG drawdown since its inception was -98.96%, which is greater than ET's maximum drawdown of -87.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLNG and ET. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

SLNG vs. ET - Volatility Comparison

Stabilis Solutions, Inc. (SLNG) has a higher volatility of 20.62% compared to Energy Transfer LP (ET) at 11.89%. This indicates that SLNG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

SLNG vs. ET - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Stabilis Solutions, Inc. and Energy Transfer LP. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B25.00B20212022202320242025
17.34M
21.02B
(SLNG) Total Revenue
(ET) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

SLNG vs. ET - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Stabilis Solutions, Inc. and Energy Transfer LP over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-30.0%-20.0%-10.0%0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%20212022202320242025
26.2%
19.4%
(SLNG) Gross Margin
(ET) Gross Margin
SLNG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Stabilis Solutions, Inc. reported a gross profit of 4.55M and revenue of 17.34M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 26.2%.

ET - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Energy Transfer LP reported a gross profit of 4.08B and revenue of 21.02B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 19.4%.

SLNG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Stabilis Solutions, Inc. reported an operating income of 368.00K and revenue of 17.34M, resulting in an operating margin of 2.1%.

ET - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Energy Transfer LP reported an operating income of 2.49B and revenue of 21.02B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.9%.

SLNG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Stabilis Solutions, Inc. reported a net income of -1.60M and revenue of 17.34M, resulting in a net margin of -9.2%.

ET - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Energy Transfer LP reported a net income of 1.32B and revenue of 21.02B, resulting in a net margin of 6.3%.