SLNG vs. ET
SLNG (Stabilis Solutions, Inc.) and ET (Energy Transfer LP) are both stocks. Both are in the Energy sector — SLNG in Oil & Gas Integrated, ET in Oil & Gas Midstream. Over the past 10 years, SLNG returned -13.47%/yr vs 12.65%/yr for ET. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SLNG vs. ET - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SLNG achieves a -1.10% return, which is significantly lower than ET's 22.86% return. Over the past 10 years, SLNG has underperformed ET with an annualized return of -13.47%, while ET has yielded a comparatively higher 12.65% annualized return.
SLNG
- 1D
- 18.70%
- 1M
- 2.51%
- YTD
- -1.10%
- 6M
- -9.64%
- 1Y
- -17.88%
- 3Y*
- 1.76%
- 5Y*
- -9.86%
- 10Y*
- -13.47%
ET
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- -0.96%
- YTD
- 22.86%
- 6M
- 21.25%
- 1Y
- 17.66%
- 3Y*
- 24.39%
- 5Y*
- 21.90%
- 10Y*
- 12.65%
SLNG vs. ET - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLNG Stabilis Solutions, Inc. | -1.10% | -14.95% | 28.92% | -21.92% | 25.65% | 53.82% | -41.49% | -32.47% | -42.00% | -3.23% |
ET Energy Transfer LP | 22.86% | -9.37% | 53.87% | 27.87% | 55.74% | 42.96% | -44.92% | 5.88% | -17.74% | -4.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between SLNG and ET is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 29, 2006 | 0.09 |
Fundamentals
SLNG:
$83.68M
ET:
$67.59B
SLNG:
-$0.21
ET:
$1.36
SLNG:
1.37
ET:
0.78
SLNG:
1.33
ET:
1.36
SLNG:
$61.29M
ET:
$89.38B
SLNG:
$10.20M
ET:
$20.48B
SLNG:
$5.58M
ET:
$13.02B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SLNG vs. ET — Risk / Return Rank
SLNG
ET
SLNG vs. ET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Stabilis Solutions, Inc. (SLNG) and Energy Transfer LP (ET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SLNG | ET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.02 | 1.19 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.40 | 1.77 | -2.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.78 | 3.90 | -4.68 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SLNG | ET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.23 | 1.09 | -1.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.13 | 0.89 | -1.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.11 | 0.36 | -0.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.10 | 0.36 | -0.46 |
Drawdowns
SLNG vs. ET - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SLNG drawdown since its inception was -98.96%, which is greater than ET's maximum drawdown of -87.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLNG and ET.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SLNG | ET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.96% | -87.81% | -11.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -45.05% | -10.02% | -35.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -58.66% | -24.56% | -34.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -72.34% | -25.82% | -46.52% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -97.09% | -72.82% | -24.27% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -94.93% | -4.12% | -90.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -74.84% | -25.75% | -49.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 22.91% | 4.55% | +18.36% |
Volatility
SLNG vs. ET - Volatility Comparison
Stabilis Solutions, Inc. (SLNG) has a higher volatility of 29.03% compared to Energy Transfer LP (ET) at 5.97%. This indicates that SLNG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SLNG | ET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 29.03% | 5.97% | +23.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 63.26% | 11.89% | +51.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 77.41% | 16.42% | +60.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 77.17% | 24.90% | +52.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 117.94% | 35.04% | +82.90% |
Dividends
SLNG vs. ET - Dividend Comparison
SLNG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.83%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ET Energy Transfer LP | 6.83% | 7.97% | 6.51% | 8.95% | 7.33% | 7.41% | 17.27% | 9.51% | 9.24% | 6.66% | 5.90% | 7.42% |
SLNG Stabilis Solutions, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
SLNG vs. ET - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Stabilis Solutions, Inc. and Energy Transfer LP. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
SLNG vs. ET - Profitability Comparison
SLNG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Stabilis Solutions, Inc. reported a gross profit of 367.00K and revenue of 10.38M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 3.5%.
ET - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Energy Transfer LP reported a gross profit of 6.62B and revenue of 27.77B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 23.9%.
SLNG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Stabilis Solutions, Inc. reported an operating income of 227.00K and revenue of 10.38M, resulting in an operating margin of 2.2%.
ET - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Energy Transfer LP reported an operating income of 2.98B and revenue of 27.77B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.7%.
SLNG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Stabilis Solutions, Inc. reported a net income of -4.08M and revenue of 10.38M, resulting in a net margin of -39.3%.
ET - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Energy Transfer LP reported a net income of 1.25B and revenue of 27.77B, resulting in a net margin of 4.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
SLNG and ET have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SLNG has higher volatility (29.03%) compared to ET (5.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLNG dropped -98.96% vs ET's -87.81%.
ET currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.09 vs -0.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SLNG and ET
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer