SLMCX vs. AINTX

In the year-to-date period, SLMCX achieves a 1.91% return, which is significantly lower than AINTX's 5.04% return. Over the past 10 years, SLMCX has outperformed AINTX with an annualized return of 8.73%, while AINTX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.44% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

SLMCX has a 1.17% expense ratio, which is higher than AINTX's 1.13% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Seligman Technology and Information Fund (SLMCX) and Ariel International Fund (AINTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current SLMCX Sharpe Ratio is 0.41, which is lower than the AINTX Sharpe Ratio of 0.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SLMCX and AINTX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

SLMCX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AINTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.73%.

The maximum SLMCX drawdown since its inception was -77.96%, which is greater than AINTX's maximum drawdown of -28.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLMCX and AINTX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Columbia Seligman Technology and Information Fund (SLMCX) has a higher volatility of 8.24% compared to Ariel International Fund (AINTX) at 3.82%. This indicates that SLMCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AINTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.