PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SLG vs. STAG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

SLG vs. STAG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SL Green Realty Corp. (SLG) and STAG Industrial, Inc. (STAG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SLG achieves a 0.13% return, which is significantly lower than STAG's 0.48% return. Over the past 10 years, SLG has underperformed STAG with an annualized return of -3.04%, while STAG has yielded a comparatively higher 10.15% annualized return.


SLG

1D
0.89%
1M
5.34%
YTD
0.13%
6M
-2.32%
1Y
-17.68%
3Y*
31.15%
5Y*
-5.53%
10Y*
-3.04%

STAG

1D
-0.52%
1M
-5.29%
YTD
0.48%
6M
-4.41%
1Y
5.03%
3Y*
4.55%
5Y*
3.82%
10Y*
10.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SLG vs. STAG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SLG
SL Green Realty Corp.
0.13%-29.03%58.26%48.75%-50.94%22.86%-29.14%20.96%-18.80%-3.25%
STAG
STAG Industrial, Inc.
0.48%13.30%-10.34%26.73%-29.66%59.10%4.18%33.20%-3.81%20.68%

Correlation

The correlation between SLG and STAG is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.52

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 18, 2011

0.51

The correlation between SLG and STAG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.44 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

SLG:

$3.49B

STAG:

$6.99B

EPS

SLG:

-$2.05

STAG:

$1.30

PS Ratio

SLG:

3.48

STAG:

7.96

PB Ratio

SLG:

1.05

STAG:

1.95

Total Revenue (TTM)

SLG:

$993.51M

STAG:

$863.82M

Gross Profit (TTM)

SLG:

$662.81M

STAG:

$356.54M

EBITDA (TTM)

SLG:

$547.76M

STAG:

$598.36M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SLG vs. STAG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SLG
SLG Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
SLG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLG Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
SLG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLG Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

STAG
STAG Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
STAG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
STAG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
STAG Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
STAG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
STAG Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SLG vs. STAG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SL Green Realty Corp. (SLG) and STAG Industrial, Inc. (STAG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SLGSTAGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.48

0.26

-0.74

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.47

0.50

-0.97

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.95

1.06

-0.11

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.37

0.67

-1.04

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.63

1.67

-2.30

SLG vs. STAG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SLG Sharpe Ratio is -0.48, which is lower than the STAG Sharpe Ratio of 0.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SLG and STAG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SLGSTAGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.48

0.26

-0.74

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.13

0.16

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.07

0.39

-0.46

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.15

0.51

-0.36

Drawdowns

SLG vs. STAG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SLG drawdown since its inception was -94.02%, which is greater than STAG's maximum drawdown of -45.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLG and STAG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SLGSTAGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-94.02%

-45.08%

-48.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-45.40%

-9.44%

-35.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-53.91%

-24.59%

-29.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-74.47%

-42.22%

-32.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-77.70%

-45.08%

-32.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-42.66%

-9.01%

-33.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-27.43%

-10.51%

-16.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

26.58%

3.77%

+22.81%

Volatility

SLG vs. STAG - Volatility Comparison

SL Green Realty Corp. (SLG) has a higher volatility of 10.61% compared to STAG Industrial, Inc. (STAG) at 5.24%. This indicates that SLG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than STAG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SLGSTAGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.61%

5.24%

+5.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.82%

13.70%

+14.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

37.24%

19.39%

+17.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

43.54%

23.41%

+20.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

42.23%

26.17%

+16.06%

Dividends

SLG vs. STAG - Dividend Comparison

SLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.79%, more than STAG's 3.44% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SLG
SL Green Realty Corp.
4.79%6.18%4.43%7.15%10.94%5.09%7.81%3.74%4.16%3.11%2.73%2.23%
STAG
STAG Industrial, Inc.
3.44%4.05%4.38%3.74%4.52%3.02%4.60%4.53%5.71%5.14%5.82%7.40%

Financials

SLG vs. STAG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between SL Green Realty Corp. and STAG Industrial, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


-50.00M0.0050.00M100.00M150.00M200.00M250.00M300.00M20222023202420252026
253.08M
224.21M
(SLG) Total Revenue
(STAG) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

SLG vs. STAG - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between SL Green Realty Corp. and STAG Industrial, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
83.4%
0
Portfolio components
SLG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, SL Green Realty Corp. reported a gross profit of 211.17M and revenue of 253.08M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 83.4%.

STAG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, STAG Industrial, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 224.21M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

SLG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, SL Green Realty Corp. reported an operating income of 188.38M and revenue of 253.08M, resulting in an operating margin of 74.4%.

STAG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, STAG Industrial, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.32M and revenue of 224.21M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.6%.

SLG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, SL Green Realty Corp. reported a net income of -84.39M and revenue of 253.08M, resulting in a net margin of -33.4%.

STAG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, STAG Industrial, Inc. reported a net income of 61.96M and revenue of 224.21M, resulting in a net margin of 27.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


SLG and STAG have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SLG has higher volatility (10.61%) compared to STAG (5.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLG dropped -94.02% vs STAG's -45.08%.

STAG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.26 vs -0.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SLG and STAG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer