PortfoliosLab logo
SLG vs. FRT
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between SLG and FRT is 0.48, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

SLG vs. FRT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SL Green Realty Corp. (SLG) and Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

SLG:

0.35

FRT:

-0.09

Sortino Ratio

SLG:

0.80

FRT:

0.06

Omega Ratio

SLG:

1.10

FRT:

1.01

Calmar Ratio

SLG:

0.36

FRT:

-0.05

Martin Ratio

SLG:

0.90

FRT:

-0.18

Ulcer Index

SLG:

16.40%

FRT:

9.00%

Daily Std Dev

SLG:

36.42%

FRT:

23.24%

Max Drawdown

SLG:

-94.02%

FRT:

-57.42%

Current Drawdown

SLG:

-27.40%

FRT:

-20.96%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

SLG:

$4.35B

FRT:

$8.27B

EPS

SLG:

-$0.42

FRT:

$3.48

PEG Ratio

SLG:

0.95

FRT:

3.60

PS Ratio

SLG:

6.71

FRT:

6.76

PB Ratio

SLG:

1.13

FRT:

2.76

Total Revenue (TTM)

SLG:

$938.24M

FRT:

$1.22B

Gross Profit (TTM)

SLG:

$521.83M

FRT:

$734.78M

EBITDA (TTM)

SLG:

$426.66M

FRT:

$824.68M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SLG achieves a -13.10% return, which is significantly lower than FRT's -11.76% return. Over the past 10 years, SLG has underperformed FRT with an annualized return of -2.28%, while FRT has yielded a comparatively higher 0.18% annualized return.


SLG

YTD

-13.10%

1M

11.85%

6M

-21.84%

1Y

12.69%

5Y*

16.73%

10Y*

-2.28%

FRT

YTD

-11.76%

1M

4.78%

6M

-12.87%

1Y

-2.10%

5Y*

10.70%

10Y*

0.18%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

SLG vs. FRT — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SLG
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of SLG is 6363
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of SLG is 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of SLG is 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of SLG is 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of SLG is 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of SLG is 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

FRT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FRT is 4343
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FRT is 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FRT is 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FRT is 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FRT is 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FRT is 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

SLG vs. FRT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SL Green Realty Corp. (SLG) and Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current SLG Sharpe Ratio is 0.35, which is higher than the FRT Sharpe Ratio of -0.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SLG and FRT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

SLG vs. FRT - Dividend Comparison

SLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.24%, more than FRT's 4.54% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
SLG
SL Green Realty Corp.
5.24%4.43%7.15%10.94%8.49%7.81%3.74%4.16%3.11%2.73%2.23%1.76%
FRT
Federal Realty Investment Trust
4.54%2.93%4.21%4.26%3.12%4.96%3.22%3.42%2.98%2.70%2.48%2.47%

Drawdowns

SLG vs. FRT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SLG drawdown since its inception was -94.02%, which is greater than FRT's maximum drawdown of -57.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLG and FRT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

SLG vs. FRT - Volatility Comparison

SL Green Realty Corp. (SLG) has a higher volatility of 10.14% compared to Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT) at 7.48%. This indicates that SLG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

SLG vs. FRT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between SL Green Realty Corp. and Federal Realty Investment Trust. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


200.00M250.00M300.00M20212022202320242025
239.85M
309.15M
(SLG) Total Revenue
(FRT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

SLG vs. FRT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between SL Green Realty Corp. and Federal Realty Investment Trust over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%20212022202320242025
49.5%
66.2%
(SLG) Gross Margin
(FRT) Gross Margin
SLG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, SL Green Realty Corp. reported a gross profit of 118.74M and revenue of 239.85M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.5%.

FRT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Federal Realty Investment Trust reported a gross profit of 204.78M and revenue of 309.15M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 66.2%.

SLG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, SL Green Realty Corp. reported an operating income of 49.01M and revenue of 239.85M, resulting in an operating margin of 20.4%.

FRT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Federal Realty Investment Trust reported an operating income of 108.13M and revenue of 309.15M, resulting in an operating margin of 35.0%.

SLG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, SL Green Realty Corp. reported a net income of -15.18M and revenue of 239.85M, resulting in a net margin of -6.3%.

FRT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Federal Realty Investment Trust reported a net income of 63.77M and revenue of 309.15M, resulting in a net margin of 20.6%.