SLG vs. FRT
Compare and contrast key facts about SL Green Realty Corp. (SLG) and Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: SLG or FRT.
Correlation
The correlation between SLG and FRT is 0.61, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
SLG vs. FRT - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
SLG:
1.65
FRT:
0.53
SLG:
2.24
FRT:
0.83
SLG:
1.27
FRT:
1.10
SLG:
1.21
FRT:
0.39
SLG:
8.96
FRT:
2.71
SLG:
6.83%
FRT:
3.52%
SLG:
37.10%
FRT:
17.97%
SLG:
-94.02%
FRT:
-57.42%
SLG:
-19.03%
FRT:
-14.83%
Fundamentals
SLG:
$4.72B
FRT:
$9.02B
SLG:
-$2.57
FRT:
$3.44
SLG:
0.95
FRT:
4.35
SLG:
$654.72M
FRT:
$891.01M
SLG:
$262.91M
FRT:
$516.11M
SLG:
$251.59M
FRT:
$618.52M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SLG achieves a -3.08% return, which is significantly higher than FRT's -4.93% return. Over the past 10 years, SLG has underperformed FRT with an annualized return of -1.62%, while FRT has yielded a comparatively higher 0.52% annualized return.
SLG
-3.08%
-4.29%
10.67%
63.22%
0.32%
-1.62%
FRT
-4.93%
-3.18%
-1.86%
10.82%
0.09%
0.52%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
SLG vs. FRT — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
SLG
FRT
SLG vs. FRT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SL Green Realty Corp. (SLG) and Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
SLG vs. FRT - Dividend Comparison
SLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.57%, more than FRT's 4.16% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLG SL Green Realty Corp. | 4.57% | 4.43% | 7.15% | 10.94% | 8.49% | 7.81% | 3.74% | 4.16% | 3.11% | 2.73% | 2.23% | 1.77% |
FRT Federal Realty Investment Trust | 4.16% | 2.93% | 4.21% | 4.26% | 3.12% | 4.96% | 3.22% | 3.42% | 2.98% | 2.70% | 2.48% | 2.47% |
Drawdowns
SLG vs. FRT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SLG drawdown since its inception was -94.02%, which is greater than FRT's maximum drawdown of -57.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLG and FRT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
SLG vs. FRT - Volatility Comparison
SL Green Realty Corp. (SLG) has a higher volatility of 11.24% compared to Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT) at 7.03%. This indicates that SLG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
SLG vs. FRT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between SL Green Realty Corp. and Federal Realty Investment Trust. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities