PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
SLG vs. ABR
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


SLGABR
YTD Return86.79%12.38%
1Y Return179.29%36.91%
3Y Return (Ann)10.01%2.95%
5Y Return (Ann)5.80%11.00%
10Y Return (Ann)1.53%19.16%
Sharpe Ratio3.680.85
Sortino Ratio4.301.31
Omega Ratio1.511.18
Calmar Ratio2.511.24
Martin Ratio36.402.77
Ulcer Index4.54%12.41%
Daily Std Dev44.87%40.23%
Max Drawdown-94.02%-97.76%
Current Drawdown-1.40%-0.83%

Fundamentals


SLGABR
Market Cap$5.32B$2.93B
EPS-$2.53$1.33
PEG Ratio0.951.20
Total Revenue (TTM)$776.37M$966.22M
Gross Profit (TTM)$416.87M$876.81M
EBITDA (TTM)$420.38M$1.19B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.4

The correlation between SLG and ABR is 0.40, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

SLG vs. ABR - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, SLG achieves a 86.79% return, which is significantly higher than ABR's 12.38% return. Over the past 10 years, SLG has underperformed ABR with an annualized return of 1.53%, while ABR has yielded a comparatively higher 19.16% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%50.00%60.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
58.21%
26.04%
SLG
ABR

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

SLG vs. ABR - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SL Green Realty Corp. (SLG) and Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. (ABR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SLG
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for SLG, currently valued at 3.68, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.003.68
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for SLG, currently valued at 4.30, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.004.30
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for SLG, currently valued at 1.51, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.51
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for SLG, currently valued at 2.51, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.002.51
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for SLG, currently valued at 36.40, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0036.40
ABR
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for ABR, currently valued at 0.85, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.85
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for ABR, currently valued at 1.31, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.001.31
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for ABR, currently valued at 1.18, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.18
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for ABR, currently valued at 1.24, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.24
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for ABR, currently valued at 2.77, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.002.77

SLG vs. ABR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SLG Sharpe Ratio is 3.68, which is higher than the ABR Sharpe Ratio of 0.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SLG and ABR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.004.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
3.68
0.85
SLG
ABR

Dividends

SLG vs. ABR - Dividend Comparison

SLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.74%, less than ABR's 11.08% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
SLG
SL Green Realty Corp.
3.74%7.15%10.95%8.49%7.82%3.74%4.16%3.11%2.73%2.23%1.77%1.61%
ABR
Arbor Realty Trust, Inc.
11.08%11.07%11.68%7.53%8.67%7.94%10.03%8.33%8.31%8.11%7.68%7.51%

Drawdowns

SLG vs. ABR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SLG drawdown since its inception was -94.02%, roughly equal to the maximum ABR drawdown of -97.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLG and ABR. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-1.40%
-0.83%
SLG
ABR

Volatility

SLG vs. ABR - Volatility Comparison

SL Green Realty Corp. (SLG) has a higher volatility of 9.25% compared to Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. (ABR) at 6.25%. This indicates that SLG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ABR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
9.25%
6.25%
SLG
ABR

Financials

SLG vs. ABR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between SL Green Realty Corp. and Arbor Realty Trust, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items