SLDP vs. QS
SLDP (Solid Power, Inc.) and QS (QuantumScape Corporation) are both stocks. SLDP operates in Electrical Equipment & Parts (Industrials), while QS operates in Auto Parts (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 5 years, SLDP returned -23.27%/yr vs -23.29%/yr for QS. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
SLDP vs. QS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SLDP achieves a -34.12% return, which is significantly lower than QS's -26.97% return.
SLDP
- 1D
- -2.44%
- 1M
- -8.50%
- YTD
- -34.12%
- 6M
- -39.00%
- 1Y
- 55.56%
- 3Y*
- 7.72%
- 5Y*
- -23.27%
- 10Y*
- —
QS
- 1D
- -5.35%
- 1M
- -7.20%
- YTD
- -26.97%
- 6M
- -33.88%
- 1Y
- 77.39%
- 3Y*
- 3.62%
- 5Y*
- -23.29%
- 10Y*
- —
SLDP vs. QS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLDP Solid Power, Inc. | -34.12% | 124.87% | 30.34% | -42.91% | -70.94% | -12.60% |
QS QuantumScape Corporation | -26.97% | 100.77% | -25.32% | 22.57% | -74.45% | -19.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between SLDP and QS is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2021 | 0.61 |
The correlation between SLDP and QS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.
Fundamentals
SLDP:
$608.44K
QS:
$4.65B
SLDP:
-$0.67
QS:
-$0.72
SLDP:
0.00
QS:
4.19
SLDP:
$17.84M
QS:
$0.00
SLDP:
-$2.22M
QS:
-$49.03M
SLDP:
-$63.00M
QS:
-$378.92M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SLDP vs. QS — Risk / Return Rank
SLDP
QS
SLDP vs. QS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Solid Power, Inc. (SLDP) and QuantumScape Corporation (QS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SLDP | QS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.22 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.81 | 1.15 | -0.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.26 | 1.75 | -0.48 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SLDP vs. QS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SLDP drawdown since its inception was -93.46%, roughly equal to the maximum QS drawdown of -97.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLDP and QS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SLDP | QS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.46% | -97.36% | +3.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -69.10% | -67.68% | -1.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -69.51% | -73.93% | +4.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -93.46% | -91.45% | -2.01% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -80.24% | -94.22% | +13.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -68.75% | -85.55% | +16.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 44.09% | 44.45% | -0.36% |
Volatility
SLDP vs. QS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Solid Power, Inc. (SLDP) is 22.47%, while QuantumScape Corporation (QS) has a volatility of 29.16%. This indicates that SLDP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SLDP | QS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 22.47% | 29.16% | -6.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 48.00% | 50.51% | -2.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 115.32% | 104.56% | +10.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 86.70% | 86.16% | +0.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 86.35% | 105.95% | -19.60% |
Dividends
SLDP vs. QS - Dividend Comparison
Neither SLDP nor QS has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
SLDP vs. QS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Solid Power, Inc. and QuantumScape Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
SLDP and QS have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QS has higher volatility (29.16%) compared to SLDP (22.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLDP dropped -93.46% vs QS's -97.36%.
QS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.75 vs 0.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SLDP and QS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer