SLDP vs. CHPT

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Solid Power, Inc. (SLDP) and ChargePoint Holdings, Inc. (CHPT).

Performance

SLDP vs. CHPT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Solid Power, Inc. (SLDP) and ChargePoint Holdings, Inc. (CHPT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

SLDP vs. CHPT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
SLDP Solid Power, Inc.	-29.41%	124.87%	30.34%	-42.91%	-70.94%	-12.60%
CHPT ChargePoint Holdings, Inc.	-26.81%	-68.97%	-54.27%	-75.45%	-49.97%	-19.79%

Fundamentals

EPS SLDP : -$0.53 CHPT : -$9.45
PS Ratio SLDP : 26.29 CHPT : 0.28
Total Revenue (TTM) SLDP : $20.69M CHPT : $411.22M
Gross Profit (TTM) SLDP : $2.32M CHPT : $125.60M
EBITDA (TTM) SLDP : -$81.58M CHPT : -$182.42M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SLDP achieves a -29.41% return, which is significantly lower than CHPT's -26.81% return.

SLDP

• 1D: 6.38%
• 1M: -15.25%
• YTD: -29.41%
• 6M: -13.54%
• 1Y: 185.71%
• 3Y*: -0.11%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CHPT

• 1D: 7.76%
• 1M: -22.86%
• YTD: -26.81%
• 6M: -55.49%
• 1Y: -59.83%
• 3Y*: -71.48%
• 5Y*: -61.79%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

SLDP vs. CHPT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SLDP

SLDP Risk / Return Rank: 84
SLDP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
SLDP Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
SLDP Omega Ratio Rank: 84
SLDP Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
SLDP Martin Ratio Rank: 79

CHPT

CHPT Risk / Return Rank: 11
CHPT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
CHPT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9
CHPT Omega Ratio Rank: 10
CHPT Calmar Ratio Rank: 12
CHPT Martin Ratio Rank: 14

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SLDP vs. CHPT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Solid Power, Inc. (SLDP) and ChargePoint Holdings, Inc. (CHPT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SLDP	CHPT	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.59	-0.83	+2.42
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.69	-1.21	+3.91
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	0.86	+0.46
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.66	-0.82	+3.48
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.44	-1.38	+6.82
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SLDP vs. CHPT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SLDP Sharpe Ratio is 1.59, which is higher than the CHPT Sharpe Ratio of -0.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SLDP and CHPT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SLDP	CHPT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.59	-0.83	+2.42
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	-0.78	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.25	-0.56	+0.31

Correlation

The correlation between SLDP and CHPT is 0.50, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

SLDP vs. CHPT - Dividend Comparison

Neither SLDP nor CHPT has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

SLDP vs. CHPT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SLDP drawdown since its inception was -93.46%, smaller than the maximum CHPT drawdown of -99.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLDP and CHPT.

Drawdown Indicators

	SLDP	CHPT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-93.46%	-99.51%	+6.05%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-66.86%	-74.18%	+7.32%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-99.37%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-78.83%	-99.47%	+20.64%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-68.38%	-63.93%	-4.45%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	32.68%	43.98%	-11.30%

Volatility

SLDP vs. CHPT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Solid Power, Inc. (SLDP) is 12.76%, while ChargePoint Holdings, Inc. (CHPT) has a volatility of 18.02%. This indicates that SLDP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CHPT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SLDP	CHPT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.76%	18.02%	-5.26%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	79.87%	47.37%	+32.50%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	117.67%	72.50%	+45.17%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	86.99%	80.01%	+6.98%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	86.99%	76.97%	+10.02%

Financials