SLAB vs. UMC
SLAB (Silicon Laboratories Inc.) and UMC (United Microelectronics Corporation) are both stocks. Both operate in the Semiconductors industry within the Technology sector. Over the past 10 years, SLAB returned 15.30%/yr vs 31.85%/yr for UMC. Their 0.42 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
SLAB vs. UMC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SLAB achieves a 66.41% return, which is significantly lower than UMC's 146.37% return. Over the past 10 years, SLAB has underperformed UMC with an annualized return of 15.30%, while UMC has yielded a comparatively higher 31.85% annualized return.
SLAB
- 1D
- 0.26%
- 1M
- -0.33%
- 6M
- 52.69%
- YTD
- 66.41%
- 1Y
- 68.91%
- 3Y*
- 13.98%
- 5Y*
- 7.86%
- 10Y*
- 15.30%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.81%
UMC
- 1D
- 0.48%
- 1M
- -21.09%
- 6M
- 90.23%
- YTD
- 146.37%
- 1Y
- 184.36%
- 3Y*
- 42.98%
- 5Y*
- 18.83%
- 10Y*
- 31.85%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.14%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $68.04M | $68.32M | $93.32M | |
| $331.44M | $369.70M | $380.82M |
SLAB vs. UMC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLAB Silicon Laboratories Inc. | 66.41% | 5.22% | -6.09% | -2.51% | -34.27% | 62.10% | 9.79% | 47.16% | -10.75% | 35.85% |
UMC United Microelectronics Corporation | 146.37% | 28.65% | -19.01% | 39.20% | -40.32% | 43.16% | 230.69% | 56.10% | -21.85% | 39.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between SLAB and UMC is 0.18, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.36 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.49 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.45 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2000 | 0.42 |
Over the past year, the correlation between SLAB and UMC has dropped to 0.18 - well below their long-term average of 0.42, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
SLAB:
$7.17B
UMC:
$47.47B
SLAB:
-$1.53
UMC:
NT$41.67
SLAB:
8.72
UMC:
4.93
SLAB:
6.53
UMC:
0.70
SLAB:
$820.55M
UMC:
NT$250.71B
SLAB:
$486.20M
UMC:
NT$76.72B
SLAB:
-$19.56M
UMC:
NT$156.27B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SLAB vs. UMC — Risk / Return Rank
SLAB
UMC
SLAB vs. UMC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Silicon Laboratories Inc. (SLAB) and United Microelectronics Corporation (UMC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SLAB | UMC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.91 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.47 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.27 | 4.87 | -1.60 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.71 | 14.42 | -3.70 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SLAB vs. UMC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SLAB drawdown since its inception was -89.29%, which is greater than UMC's maximum drawdown of -72.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLAB and UMC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SLAB | UMC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -89.29% | -72.52% | -16.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.01% | -37.84% | +17.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -45.70% | -37.84% | -7.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -58.99% | -54.30% | -4.69% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -58.99% | -54.30% | -4.69% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.29% | -30.86% | +29.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -46.75% | -42.39% | -4.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.09% | 12.76% | -6.67% |
Volatility
SLAB vs. UMC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Silicon Laboratories Inc. (SLAB) is 0.94%, while United Microelectronics Corporation (UMC) has a volatility of 24.73%. This indicates that SLAB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UMC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SLAB | UMC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.94% | 24.73% | -23.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 40.40% | 50.05% | -9.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 56.74% | 60.25% | -3.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 48.58% | 42.41% | +6.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 45.00% | 41.08% | +3.92% |
Dividends
SLAB vs. UMC - Dividend Comparison
SLAB has not paid dividends to shareholders, while UMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.17%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLAB Silicon Laboratories Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UMC United Microelectronics Corporation | 2.17% | 6.06% | 7.14% | 6.93% | 7.92% | 2.44% | 1.62% | 3.51% | 6.59% | 2.41% | 3.61% | 3.15% |
Financials
SLAB vs. UMC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Silicon Laboratories Inc. and United Microelectronics Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
SLAB vs. UMC - Profitability Comparison
SLAB - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Silicon Laboratories Inc. reported a gross profit of 127.00M and revenue of 213.50M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 59.5%.
UMC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, United Microelectronics Corporation reported a gross profit of 22.32B and revenue of 68.73B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 32.5%.
SLAB - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Silicon Laboratories Inc. reported an operating income of -17.08M and revenue of 213.50M, resulting in an operating margin of -8.0%.
UMC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, United Microelectronics Corporation reported an operating income of 14.88B and revenue of 68.73B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.7%.
SLAB - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Silicon Laboratories Inc. reported a net income of -15.90M and revenue of 213.50M, resulting in a net margin of -7.5%.
UMC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, United Microelectronics Corporation reported a net income of 42.26B and revenue of 68.73B, resulting in a net margin of 61.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
SLAB and UMC have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UMC has higher volatility (24.73%) compared to SLAB (0.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLAB dropped -89.29% vs UMC's -72.52%.
UMC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.07 vs 1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SLAB and UMC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer