SLAB vs. STM

In the year-to-date period, SLAB achieves a -3.77% return, which is significantly higher than STM's -50.65% return. Over the past 10 years, SLAB has underperformed STM with an annualized return of 10.22%, while STM has yielded a comparatively higher 13.98% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Silicon Laboratories Inc. (SLAB) and STMicroelectronics N.V. (STM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current SLAB Sharpe Ratio is 0.01, which is higher than the STM Sharpe Ratio of -1.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SLAB and STM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

SLAB has not paid dividends to shareholders, while STM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.35%.

The maximum SLAB drawdown since its inception was -89.29%, smaller than the maximum STM drawdown of -94.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLAB and STM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Silicon Laboratories Inc. (SLAB) has a higher volatility of 14.56% compared to STMicroelectronics N.V. (STM) at 7.98%. This indicates that SLAB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than STM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Silicon Laboratories Inc. and STMicroelectronics N.V.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.