PortfoliosLab logo
SLAB vs. STM
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between SLAB and STM is 0.57, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

SLAB vs. STM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Silicon Laboratories Inc. (SLAB) and STMicroelectronics N.V. (STM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

SLAB:

0.03

STM:

-0.71

Sortino Ratio

SLAB:

0.55

STM:

-0.78

Omega Ratio

SLAB:

1.07

STM:

0.90

Calmar Ratio

SLAB:

0.11

STM:

-0.52

Martin Ratio

SLAB:

0.37

STM:

-0.91

Ulcer Index

SLAB:

18.14%

STM:

38.22%

Daily Std Dev

SLAB:

52.31%

STM:

52.58%

Max Drawdown

SLAB:

-89.29%

STM:

-94.40%

Current Drawdown

SLAB:

-36.71%

STM:

-51.12%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

SLAB:

$4.34B

STM:

$23.31B

EPS

SLAB:

-$5.92

STM:

$1.18

PEG Ratio

SLAB:

3.03

STM:

2.74

PS Ratio

SLAB:

7.42

STM:

1.89

PB Ratio

SLAB:

4.02

STM:

1.32

Total Revenue (TTM)

SLAB:

$655.73M

STM:

$12.32B

Gross Profit (TTM)

SLAB:

$348.82M

STM:

$4.62B

EBITDA (TTM)

SLAB:

-$93.31M

STM:

$2.88B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SLAB achieves a 7.04% return, which is significantly higher than STM's 4.79% return. Over the past 10 years, SLAB has underperformed STM with an annualized return of 9.97%, while STM has yielded a comparatively higher 14.03% annualized return.


SLAB

YTD

7.04%

1M

45.64%

6M

25.60%

1Y

1.77%

5Y*

8.03%

10Y*

9.97%

STM

YTD

4.79%

1M

27.29%

6M

1.50%

1Y

-36.90%

5Y*

2.74%

10Y*

14.03%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

SLAB vs. STM — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SLAB
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of SLAB is 5454
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of SLAB is 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of SLAB is 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of SLAB is 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of SLAB is 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of SLAB is 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

STM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of STM is 1818
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of STM is 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of STM is 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of STM is 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of STM is 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of STM is 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

SLAB vs. STM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Silicon Laboratories Inc. (SLAB) and STMicroelectronics N.V. (STM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current SLAB Sharpe Ratio is 0.03, which is higher than the STM Sharpe Ratio of -0.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SLAB and STM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

SLAB vs. STM - Dividend Comparison

SLAB has not paid dividends to shareholders, while STM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.38%.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
SLAB
Silicon Laboratories Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
STM
STMicroelectronics N.V.
1.38%1.32%0.48%0.82%0.45%0.50%0.86%1.47%0.93%2.10%5.11%4.55%

Drawdowns

SLAB vs. STM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SLAB drawdown since its inception was -89.29%, smaller than the maximum STM drawdown of -94.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLAB and STM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

SLAB vs. STM - Volatility Comparison

Silicon Laboratories Inc. (SLAB) has a higher volatility of 12.98% compared to STMicroelectronics N.V. (STM) at 12.20%. This indicates that SLAB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than STM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

SLAB vs. STM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Silicon Laboratories Inc. and STMicroelectronics N.V.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B20212022202320242025
177.71M
2.52B
(SLAB) Total Revenue
(STM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

SLAB vs. STM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Silicon Laboratories Inc. and STMicroelectronics N.V. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%20212022202320242025
55.0%
33.4%
(SLAB) Gross Margin
(STM) Gross Margin
SLAB - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Silicon Laboratories Inc. reported a gross profit of 97.78M and revenue of 177.71M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 55.0%.

STM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, STMicroelectronics N.V. reported a gross profit of 841.00M and revenue of 2.52B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 33.4%.

SLAB - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Silicon Laboratories Inc. reported an operating income of -32.08M and revenue of 177.71M, resulting in an operating margin of -18.1%.

STM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, STMicroelectronics N.V. reported an operating income of 3.00M and revenue of 2.52B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.1%.

SLAB - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Silicon Laboratories Inc. reported a net income of -30.47M and revenue of 177.71M, resulting in a net margin of -17.2%.

STM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, STMicroelectronics N.V. reported a net income of 56.00M and revenue of 2.52B, resulting in a net margin of 2.2%.