SLAB vs. MXL

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Silicon Laboratories Inc. (SLAB) and MaxLinear, Inc. (MXL).

Performance

SLAB vs. MXL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Silicon Laboratories Inc. (SLAB) and MaxLinear, Inc. (MXL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

SLAB vs. MXL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SLAB Silicon Laboratories Inc.	59.26%	5.22%	-6.09%	-2.51%	-34.27%	62.10%	9.79%	47.16%	-10.75%	35.85%
MXL MaxLinear, Inc.	-0.23%	-11.88%	-16.79%	-29.99%	-54.97%	97.41%	79.97%	20.57%	-33.38%	21.19%

Fundamentals

Market Cap SLAB : $6.85B MXL : $1.52B
EPS SLAB : -$1.98 MXL : -$1.57
PS Ratio SLAB : 8.68 MXL : 3.24
PB Ratio SLAB : 6.26 MXL : 3.12
Total Revenue (TTM) SLAB : $784.76M MXL : $467.64M
Gross Profit (TTM) SLAB : $456.98M MXL : $264.28M
EBITDA (TTM) SLAB : -$30.25M MXL : -$100.88M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SLAB achieves a 59.26% return, which is significantly higher than MXL's -0.23% return. Over the past 10 years, SLAB has outperformed MXL with an annualized return of 16.31%, while MXL has yielded a comparatively lower -0.68% annualized return.

SLAB

• 1D: 1.12%
• 1M: 1.77%
• YTD: 59.26%
• 6M: 58.74%
• 1Y: 84.91%
• 3Y*: 5.93%
• 5Y*: 7.07%
• 10Y*: 16.31%

MXL

• 1D: 8.15%
• 1M: -0.23%
• YTD: -0.23%
• 6M: 8.15%
• 1Y: 60.13%
• 3Y*: -20.95%
• 5Y*: -13.80%
• 10Y*: -0.68%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

SLAB vs. MXL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SLAB

SLAB Risk / Return Rank: 86
SLAB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
SLAB Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
SLAB Omega Ratio Rank: 89
SLAB Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
SLAB Martin Ratio Rank: 84

MXL

MXL Risk / Return Rank: 73
MXL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
MXL Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
MXL Omega Ratio Rank: 68
MXL Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
MXL Martin Ratio Rank: 78

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SLAB vs. MXL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Silicon Laboratories Inc. (SLAB) and MaxLinear, Inc. (MXL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SLAB	MXL	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.28	0.91	+0.37
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.61	1.56	+1.05
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.20	+0.17
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.21	2.17	+1.04
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	7.39	5.31	+2.08
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SLAB vs. MXL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SLAB Sharpe Ratio is 1.28, which is higher than the MXL Sharpe Ratio of 0.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SLAB and MXL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SLAB	MXL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.28	0.91	+0.37
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.14	-0.21	+0.36
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.36	-0.01	+0.37
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.08	-0.01	+0.09

Correlation

The correlation between SLAB and MXL is 0.57, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

SLAB vs. MXL - Dividend Comparison

Neither SLAB nor MXL has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

SLAB vs. MXL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SLAB drawdown since its inception was -89.29%, roughly equal to the maximum MXL drawdown of -88.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLAB and MXL.

Drawdown Indicators

	SLAB	MXL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-89.29%	-88.13%	-1.16%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-26.18%	-26.81%	+0.63%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-58.99%	-88.13%	+29.14%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-58.99%	-88.13%	+29.14%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.93%	-77.44%	+76.51%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-47.35%	-45.22%	-2.13%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	11.39%	10.97%	+0.42%

Volatility

SLAB vs. MXL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Silicon Laboratories Inc. (SLAB) is 2.09%, while MaxLinear, Inc. (MXL) has a volatility of 17.02%. This indicates that SLAB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MXL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SLAB	MXL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.09%	17.02%	-14.93%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	46.56%	44.32%	+2.24%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	66.65%	66.59%	+0.06%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	49.33%	64.97%	-15.64%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	45.35%	58.97%	-13.62%

Financials

SLAB vs. MXL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Silicon Laboratories Inc. and MaxLinear, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

SLAB - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Silicon Laboratories Inc. reported a gross profit of 132.08M and revenue of 208.21M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 63.4%.

MXL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, MaxLinear, Inc. reported a gross profit of 78.56M and revenue of 136.44M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 57.6%.

SLAB - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Silicon Laboratories Inc. reported an operating income of -3.25M and revenue of 208.21M, resulting in an operating margin of -1.6%.

MXL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, MaxLinear, Inc. reported an operating income of -14.89M and revenue of 136.44M, resulting in an operating margin of -10.9%.

SLAB - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Silicon Laboratories Inc. reported a net income of -2.68M and revenue of 208.21M, resulting in a net margin of -1.3%.

MXL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, MaxLinear, Inc. reported a net income of -14.90M and revenue of 136.44M, resulting in a net margin of -10.9%.